TY - JOUR
T1 - Preparing Medical Students and Physicians to Cope With Their Medical Errors
T2 - A Scoping Review
AU - Harrison, Julia
AU - Ting, Chee Yan
AU - Leech, Michelle
AU - Molloy, Elizabeth
AU - Bearman, Margaret
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Purpose Many clinicians will experience feeling responsible for inadvertently harming a patient through medical error. These situations can be distressing, difficult to navigate, and career altering. In addition to aftermath support, there is a recognized need for preemptive education to better prepare clinicians to cope after such events. Little published guidance exists about how best to do this. This scoping review explores the current knowledge about educational programs and strategies to prepare medical students and physicians to cope effectively with their own medical errors. Method Three online databases, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus, were searched on January 3, 2025, for articles published from database inception to the search date that described programs designed to prepare medical students and/or physicians to cope better with personal involvement in patient harm from medical error. Eligibility screening and data recording were independently performed by 2 reviewers. Simple data were summarized and common pedagogical strategies were identified by inductive thematic analysis. Results The search yielded 5,359 unique articles for screening, of which 97 full-text articles were retrieved. Twelve articles met the eligibility criteria. The study interventions vary in structure and delivery methods but share similar rationale, key messages, and pedagogical strategies. Dominant pedagogical strategies were divided into 2 groups: (1) what students need to learn about coping after medical error (attend to emotions, universality of fallibility, helpful and unhelpful paths for coping, workplace culture, care for colleagues, transferal of learning to the workplace) and (2) ways to support students in this learning (actual cases, psychological safety and honest conversation, role-modeling, reflection and learning from others' experience). Conclusions A constellation of pedagogical strategies synthesized from the literature provides program design ideas for education that targets the development of learners' capacity to cope with involvement in patient harm from medical error.
AB - Purpose Many clinicians will experience feeling responsible for inadvertently harming a patient through medical error. These situations can be distressing, difficult to navigate, and career altering. In addition to aftermath support, there is a recognized need for preemptive education to better prepare clinicians to cope after such events. Little published guidance exists about how best to do this. This scoping review explores the current knowledge about educational programs and strategies to prepare medical students and physicians to cope effectively with their own medical errors. Method Three online databases, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus, were searched on January 3, 2025, for articles published from database inception to the search date that described programs designed to prepare medical students and/or physicians to cope better with personal involvement in patient harm from medical error. Eligibility screening and data recording were independently performed by 2 reviewers. Simple data were summarized and common pedagogical strategies were identified by inductive thematic analysis. Results The search yielded 5,359 unique articles for screening, of which 97 full-text articles were retrieved. Twelve articles met the eligibility criteria. The study interventions vary in structure and delivery methods but share similar rationale, key messages, and pedagogical strategies. Dominant pedagogical strategies were divided into 2 groups: (1) what students need to learn about coping after medical error (attend to emotions, universality of fallibility, helpful and unhelpful paths for coping, workplace culture, care for colleagues, transferal of learning to the workplace) and (2) ways to support students in this learning (actual cases, psychological safety and honest conversation, role-modeling, reflection and learning from others' experience). Conclusions A constellation of pedagogical strategies synthesized from the literature provides program design ideas for education that targets the development of learners' capacity to cope with involvement in patient harm from medical error.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007981168
U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000006120
DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000006120
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 40479517
AN - SCOPUS:105007981168
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 100
SP - 1218
EP - 1225
JO - Academic Medicine
JF - Academic Medicine
IS - 10
M1 - 06120
ER -