Prehospital Predictors of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Victoria, Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the predictors of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and describe the differences between confirmed and potential TSCI cases in the prehospital setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including all adult patients over a six-year period (2007–12) with potential TSCI who were attended and transported by Ambulance Victoria (AV). We extracted potential TSCI cases from the AV data warehouse and linked with the Victorian State Trauma Registry to compare with final hospital diagnosis. Results: We included a total of 106,059 patients with potential TSCI in the study, with 257 having a spinal cord injury confirmed at hospital (0.2%). The median [First and third Quartiles] age of confirmed TSCI cases was 49 [32–69] years, with males comprising 84.1%. Confirmed TSCI were mainly due to falls (44.8%) and traffic incidents (40.5%). AV spinal care guidelines had a sensitivity of 100% to detect confirmed TSCI. There were several factors associated with a diagnosis of TSCI. These were meeting AV Potential Major Trauma criteria, male gender, presence of neurological deficit, presence of an altered state of consciousness, high falls (> 3 meters), diving, or motorcycle or bicycle collisions. Conclusion: This study identified several predictors of TSCI including meeting AV Potential Major Trauma criteria, male gender, presence of neurological deficit, presence of an altered state of consciousness, high falls (> 3 meters), diving, or motorcycle or bicycle collisions. Most of these predictors are included in NEXUS and/or CCR criteria, however, Potential Major Trauma criteria have not previously been linked to the presence of TSCI. Therefore, Emergency Medical Systems are encouraged to integrate similar Potential Major Trauma criteria into their guidelines and protocols to further improve the provider's accuracy in identifying TSCI and to be more selective in their spinal immobilization, thereby reducing unwarranted adverse effects of this practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-590
Number of pages8
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Apr 2017

Cite this

@article{1b1feca6a52742f4946d1ad25b567d92,
title = "Prehospital Predictors of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Victoria, Australia",
abstract = "Objectives: To identify the predictors of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and describe the differences between confirmed and potential TSCI cases in the prehospital setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including all adult patients over a six-year period (2007–12) with potential TSCI who were attended and transported by Ambulance Victoria (AV). We extracted potential TSCI cases from the AV data warehouse and linked with the Victorian State Trauma Registry to compare with final hospital diagnosis. Results: We included a total of 106,059 patients with potential TSCI in the study, with 257 having a spinal cord injury confirmed at hospital (0.2{\%}). The median [First and third Quartiles] age of confirmed TSCI cases was 49 [32–69] years, with males comprising 84.1{\%}. Confirmed TSCI were mainly due to falls (44.8{\%}) and traffic incidents (40.5{\%}). AV spinal care guidelines had a sensitivity of 100{\%} to detect confirmed TSCI. There were several factors associated with a diagnosis of TSCI. These were meeting AV Potential Major Trauma criteria, male gender, presence of neurological deficit, presence of an altered state of consciousness, high falls (> 3 meters), diving, or motorcycle or bicycle collisions. Conclusion: This study identified several predictors of TSCI including meeting AV Potential Major Trauma criteria, male gender, presence of neurological deficit, presence of an altered state of consciousness, high falls (> 3 meters), diving, or motorcycle or bicycle collisions. Most of these predictors are included in NEXUS and/or CCR criteria, however, Potential Major Trauma criteria have not previously been linked to the presence of TSCI. Therefore, Emergency Medical Systems are encouraged to integrate similar Potential Major Trauma criteria into their guidelines and protocols to further improve the provider's accuracy in identifying TSCI and to be more selective in their spinal immobilization, thereby reducing unwarranted adverse effects of this practice.",
author = "Oteir, {Alaa O.} and Karen Smith and Johannes Stoelwinder and Middleton, {James W.} and Shelley Cox and Sharwood, {Lisa N.} and Jennings, {Paul A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/10903127.2017.1308608",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "583--590",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

Prehospital Predictors of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Victoria, Australia. / Oteir, Alaa O.; Smith, Karen; Stoelwinder, Johannes; Middleton, James W.; Cox, Shelley; Sharwood, Lisa N.; Jennings, Paul A.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 21, No. 5, 17.04.2017, p. 583-590.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prehospital Predictors of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Victoria, Australia

AU - Oteir, Alaa O.

AU - Smith, Karen

AU - Stoelwinder, Johannes

AU - Middleton, James W.

AU - Cox, Shelley

AU - Sharwood, Lisa N.

AU - Jennings, Paul A.

PY - 2017/4/17

Y1 - 2017/4/17

N2 - Objectives: To identify the predictors of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and describe the differences between confirmed and potential TSCI cases in the prehospital setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including all adult patients over a six-year period (2007–12) with potential TSCI who were attended and transported by Ambulance Victoria (AV). We extracted potential TSCI cases from the AV data warehouse and linked with the Victorian State Trauma Registry to compare with final hospital diagnosis. Results: We included a total of 106,059 patients with potential TSCI in the study, with 257 having a spinal cord injury confirmed at hospital (0.2%). The median [First and third Quartiles] age of confirmed TSCI cases was 49 [32–69] years, with males comprising 84.1%. Confirmed TSCI were mainly due to falls (44.8%) and traffic incidents (40.5%). AV spinal care guidelines had a sensitivity of 100% to detect confirmed TSCI. There were several factors associated with a diagnosis of TSCI. These were meeting AV Potential Major Trauma criteria, male gender, presence of neurological deficit, presence of an altered state of consciousness, high falls (> 3 meters), diving, or motorcycle or bicycle collisions. Conclusion: This study identified several predictors of TSCI including meeting AV Potential Major Trauma criteria, male gender, presence of neurological deficit, presence of an altered state of consciousness, high falls (> 3 meters), diving, or motorcycle or bicycle collisions. Most of these predictors are included in NEXUS and/or CCR criteria, however, Potential Major Trauma criteria have not previously been linked to the presence of TSCI. Therefore, Emergency Medical Systems are encouraged to integrate similar Potential Major Trauma criteria into their guidelines and protocols to further improve the provider's accuracy in identifying TSCI and to be more selective in their spinal immobilization, thereby reducing unwarranted adverse effects of this practice.

AB - Objectives: To identify the predictors of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and describe the differences between confirmed and potential TSCI cases in the prehospital setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including all adult patients over a six-year period (2007–12) with potential TSCI who were attended and transported by Ambulance Victoria (AV). We extracted potential TSCI cases from the AV data warehouse and linked with the Victorian State Trauma Registry to compare with final hospital diagnosis. Results: We included a total of 106,059 patients with potential TSCI in the study, with 257 having a spinal cord injury confirmed at hospital (0.2%). The median [First and third Quartiles] age of confirmed TSCI cases was 49 [32–69] years, with males comprising 84.1%. Confirmed TSCI were mainly due to falls (44.8%) and traffic incidents (40.5%). AV spinal care guidelines had a sensitivity of 100% to detect confirmed TSCI. There were several factors associated with a diagnosis of TSCI. These were meeting AV Potential Major Trauma criteria, male gender, presence of neurological deficit, presence of an altered state of consciousness, high falls (> 3 meters), diving, or motorcycle or bicycle collisions. Conclusion: This study identified several predictors of TSCI including meeting AV Potential Major Trauma criteria, male gender, presence of neurological deficit, presence of an altered state of consciousness, high falls (> 3 meters), diving, or motorcycle or bicycle collisions. Most of these predictors are included in NEXUS and/or CCR criteria, however, Potential Major Trauma criteria have not previously been linked to the presence of TSCI. Therefore, Emergency Medical Systems are encouraged to integrate similar Potential Major Trauma criteria into their guidelines and protocols to further improve the provider's accuracy in identifying TSCI and to be more selective in their spinal immobilization, thereby reducing unwarranted adverse effects of this practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017509416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903127.2017.1308608

DO - 10.1080/10903127.2017.1308608

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 583

EP - 590

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 5

ER -