Predictors of mortality following severe pelvic ring fracture: Results of a population-based study

Belinda Gabbe, Richard Noel de Steiger, Max Esser, Andrew Bucknill, Matthias Russ, Peter Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)


Introduction: Traumatic disruption of the pelvic ring is uncommon but is associated with a high risk of mortality. These injuries are predominantly due to high energy blunt trauma such as a fall from height, road or workplace trauma, and severe associated injuries are prevalent, increasing the complexity of managing this patient group. The aim of this population-based study was to investigate predictors of mortality following severe pelvic ring fractures managed in an inclusive, regionalised trauma system. Methods: Cases aged 15 years from 1st July 2001 to 30th June 2008 were extracted from the population-based statewide Victorian State Trauma Registry for analysis. Patient demographic, prehospital and admission characteristics were considered as potential predictors of mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of mortality with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95 confidence intervals (CI) calculated. Results: There were 348 cases over the 8-year period. The mortality rate was 19 . Patients aged 65 years were at higher odds of mortality (AOR 7.6, 95 CI: 2.8, 20.4) than patients aged 15a??34 years. Patients hypotensive at the scene (AOR 5.5, 95 CI: 2.3, 13.2), and on arrival at the definitive hospital of care (AOR 3.7, 955 CI: 1.7, 8.0), were more likely to die than patients without hypotension. The presence of a severe chest injury was associated with an increased odds of mortality (AOR 2.8, 95 CI: 1.3, 6.1), whilst patients injured in intentional events were also more likely to die than patients involved in unintentional events (AOR 4.9, 95 CI: 1.6, 15.6). There was no association between the hospital of definitive management and mortality after adjustment for other variables, despite differences in the protocols for managing these patients at the major trauma services (Level 1 trauma centres). Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of effective control of haemodynamic instability for reducing the risk of mortality. As most patients survive these injuries, further research should focus on long term morbidity and the impact of different treatment approaches.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)985 - 991
Number of pages7
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Cite this