Predicting outcomes of intermediate term complications and revisional surgery following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Utility of the CORE classification and melbourne motility criteria

Paul Burton, Wendy Brown, Cheryl Laurie, Geoffrey Hebbard, Paul O'Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (LAGB) present at times with adverse symptoms or unsatisfactory weight loss, where a liquid contrast swallow or upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is not diagnostic. Stress barium and high resolution manometry are promising investigations, however, have not yet been established as clinically useful. Patients with an unsatisfactory outcome following LAGB, where liquid contrast swallow and endoscopy were not diagnostic, were evaluated using high resolution video manometry and a stress barium. Pre-operative and follow-up clinical data were collected. Esophageal motility was assessed using the Melbourne criteria.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1516 - 1523
Number of pages8
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume20
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Cite this

@article{99ee27671df94b05a7e6b167f69b7c5a,
title = "Predicting outcomes of intermediate term complications and revisional surgery following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Utility of the CORE classification and melbourne motility criteria",
abstract = "Patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (LAGB) present at times with adverse symptoms or unsatisfactory weight loss, where a liquid contrast swallow or upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is not diagnostic. Stress barium and high resolution manometry are promising investigations, however, have not yet been established as clinically useful. Patients with an unsatisfactory outcome following LAGB, where liquid contrast swallow and endoscopy were not diagnostic, were evaluated using high resolution video manometry and a stress barium. Pre-operative and follow-up clinical data were collected. Esophageal motility was assessed using the Melbourne criteria.",
author = "Paul Burton and Wendy Brown and Cheryl Laurie and Geoffrey Hebbard and Paul O'Brien",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s11695-010-0258-0",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1516 -- 1523",
journal = "Obesity Surgery",
issn = "0960-8923",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting outcomes of intermediate term complications and revisional surgery following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Utility of the CORE classification and melbourne motility criteria

AU - Burton, Paul

AU - Brown, Wendy

AU - Laurie, Cheryl

AU - Hebbard, Geoffrey

AU - O'Brien, Paul

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (LAGB) present at times with adverse symptoms or unsatisfactory weight loss, where a liquid contrast swallow or upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is not diagnostic. Stress barium and high resolution manometry are promising investigations, however, have not yet been established as clinically useful. Patients with an unsatisfactory outcome following LAGB, where liquid contrast swallow and endoscopy were not diagnostic, were evaluated using high resolution video manometry and a stress barium. Pre-operative and follow-up clinical data were collected. Esophageal motility was assessed using the Melbourne criteria.

AB - Patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (LAGB) present at times with adverse symptoms or unsatisfactory weight loss, where a liquid contrast swallow or upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is not diagnostic. Stress barium and high resolution manometry are promising investigations, however, have not yet been established as clinically useful. Patients with an unsatisfactory outcome following LAGB, where liquid contrast swallow and endoscopy were not diagnostic, were evaluated using high resolution video manometry and a stress barium. Pre-operative and follow-up clinical data were collected. Esophageal motility was assessed using the Melbourne criteria.

UR - http://www.springerlink.com/content/p81g8pr450t21165/fulltext.pdf

U2 - 10.1007/s11695-010-0258-0

DO - 10.1007/s11695-010-0258-0

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1516

EP - 1523

JO - Obesity Surgery

JF - Obesity Surgery

SN - 0960-8923

IS - 11

ER -