TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Ambulance Patient Wait Times
T2 - A Multicenter Derivation and Validation Study
AU - Walker, Katie J.
AU - Jiarpakdee, Jirayus
AU - Loupis, Anne
AU - Tantithamthavorn, Chakkrit
AU - Joe, Keith
AU - Ben-Meir, Michael
AU - Akhlaghi, Hamed
AU - Hutton, Jennie
AU - Wang, Wei
AU - Stephenson, Michael
AU - Blecher, Gabriel
AU - Buntine, Paul
AU - Sweeny, Amy
AU - Turhan, Burak
AU - on behalf of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, Clinical Trials Network
N1 - Funding Information:
Author contributions: KJW was the principal investigator. KJ, KJW, and MBM were responsible for funding. KJW, BT, CT, JJ, and WW developed the study design and protocol. All authors revised the study protocol. KJW and AL provided ethics/governance. HA, GB, PB, KJW, and AS were the site chief investigators. AL, HA, PB, KJW, and AS collected the data. JJ, CT, and BT analyzed the data. KJW, JJ, CT, and BT wrote the manuscript and all authors revised the manuscript. KJW and BT take responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding Information:
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org ). The Medical Research Future Fund , by Monash Partners, funded this study. Researchers contributed in kind donations of time. The Cabrini Institute and Monash University provided research infrastructure support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American College of Emergency Physicians
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Study objective: To derive and internally and externally validate machine-learning models to predict emergency ambulance patient door–to–off-stretcher wait times that are applicable to a wide variety of emergency departments. Methods: Nine emergency departments provided 3 years (2017 to 2019) of retrospective administrative data from Australia. Descriptive and exploratory analyses were undertaken on the datasets. Statistical and machine-learning models were developed to predict wait times at each site and were internally and externally validated. Results: There were 421,894 episodes analyzed, and median site off-load times varied from 13 (interquartile range [IQR], 9 to 20) to 29 (IQR, 16 to 48) minutes. The global site prediction model median absolute errors were 11.7 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7 to 11.8) using linear regression and 12.8 minutes (95% CI, 12.7 to 12.9) using elastic net. The individual site model prediction median absolute errors varied from the most accurate at 6.3 minutes (95% CI, 6.2 to 6.4) to the least accurate at 16.1 minutes (95% CI, 15.8 to 16.3). The model technique performance was the same for linear regression, random forests, elastic net, and rolling average. The important variables were the last k-patient average waits, triage category, and patient age. The global model performed at the lower end of the accuracy range compared with models for the individual sites but was within tolerable limits. Conclusion: Electronic emergency demographic and flow information can be used to estimate emergency ambulance patient off-stretcher times. Models can be built with reasonable accuracy for multiple hospitals using a small number of point-of-care variables.
AB - Study objective: To derive and internally and externally validate machine-learning models to predict emergency ambulance patient door–to–off-stretcher wait times that are applicable to a wide variety of emergency departments. Methods: Nine emergency departments provided 3 years (2017 to 2019) of retrospective administrative data from Australia. Descriptive and exploratory analyses were undertaken on the datasets. Statistical and machine-learning models were developed to predict wait times at each site and were internally and externally validated. Results: There were 421,894 episodes analyzed, and median site off-load times varied from 13 (interquartile range [IQR], 9 to 20) to 29 (IQR, 16 to 48) minutes. The global site prediction model median absolute errors were 11.7 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7 to 11.8) using linear regression and 12.8 minutes (95% CI, 12.7 to 12.9) using elastic net. The individual site model prediction median absolute errors varied from the most accurate at 6.3 minutes (95% CI, 6.2 to 6.4) to the least accurate at 16.1 minutes (95% CI, 15.8 to 16.3). The model technique performance was the same for linear regression, random forests, elastic net, and rolling average. The important variables were the last k-patient average waits, triage category, and patient age. The global model performed at the lower end of the accuracy range compared with models for the individual sites but was within tolerable limits. Conclusion: Electronic emergency demographic and flow information can be used to estimate emergency ambulance patient off-stretcher times. Models can be built with reasonable accuracy for multiple hospitals using a small number of point-of-care variables.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105445985&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.02.010
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.02.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 33972127
AN - SCOPUS:85105445985
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 78
SP - 113
EP - 122
JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine
JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine
IS - 1
ER -