TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting 10-Year Risk of Pancreatic Cancer Using a Combined Genetic and Clinical Model
AU - Dite, Gillian S.
AU - Spaeth, Erika
AU - Wong, Chi Kuen
AU - Murphy, Nicholas M.
AU - Allman, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to thank Mr Lawrence Whiting for his invaluable expertise in the management of the large data files from the UK Biobank. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank resource under Application Number 47401. This research used data provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support, copyright © (2023), NHS England, and is reused with the permission of the UK Biobank. All rights reserved. This research used data assets made available by National Safe Haven as part of the Data and Connectivity National Core Study, led by Health Data Research UK in partnership with the Office for National Statistics and funded by UK Research and Innovation (grant reference MC_PC_20058).
Funding Information:
Funding: This study was fully funded by Genetic Technologies Limited, which had no role in the conceptualization, design, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Background and Aims: Pancreatic cancer has the poorest 5-year survival rate of any major solid tumor, but when diagnosed at an early stage, survival rates improve. Population screening is impractical because pancreatic cancer is rare with a lifetime risk of 1.7%, but accurate risk stratification in the general population could enable health care providers to focus early detection strategies to at-risk individuals. Here, we validate a combined risk prediction model that integrates a polygenic risk score and a clinical risk model. Methods: Using the UK Biobank, we conducted a prospective cohort study assessing 10-year pancreatic cancer risks based on a polygenic risk score, a clinical risk score, and a combined risk score. We assessed the association, discrimination, calibration, cumulative hazards, and standardized incidence ratios compared to population incidence rates for the risk scores. We also conducted net reclassification analyses. Results: While all of the risk scores discriminated well between affected and unaffected participants, the combined risk score – with a Harrell's C-index of 0.714 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.698, 0.730) – discriminated better than both the polygenic risk score (P =.001) and the clinical risk score (P =.02). In terms of calibration, there was no problem with dispersion for the combined risk score (β = 0.952, 95% CI = 0.865–1.039, P =.3) and overall there was a small overestimation of risk (α = −0.089, 95% CI = −0.156 to −0.021, P =.009). Participants in the top decile of 10-year risk were at 1.413 (95% CI = 1.242–1.607) times population risk. Conclusion: The combined risk score was able to identify individuals at substantially increased risk of pancreatic cancer and to whom targeted screening could be useful.
AB - Background and Aims: Pancreatic cancer has the poorest 5-year survival rate of any major solid tumor, but when diagnosed at an early stage, survival rates improve. Population screening is impractical because pancreatic cancer is rare with a lifetime risk of 1.7%, but accurate risk stratification in the general population could enable health care providers to focus early detection strategies to at-risk individuals. Here, we validate a combined risk prediction model that integrates a polygenic risk score and a clinical risk model. Methods: Using the UK Biobank, we conducted a prospective cohort study assessing 10-year pancreatic cancer risks based on a polygenic risk score, a clinical risk score, and a combined risk score. We assessed the association, discrimination, calibration, cumulative hazards, and standardized incidence ratios compared to population incidence rates for the risk scores. We also conducted net reclassification analyses. Results: While all of the risk scores discriminated well between affected and unaffected participants, the combined risk score – with a Harrell's C-index of 0.714 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.698, 0.730) – discriminated better than both the polygenic risk score (P =.001) and the clinical risk score (P =.02). In terms of calibration, there was no problem with dispersion for the combined risk score (β = 0.952, 95% CI = 0.865–1.039, P =.3) and overall there was a small overestimation of risk (α = −0.089, 95% CI = −0.156 to −0.021, P =.009). Participants in the top decile of 10-year risk were at 1.413 (95% CI = 1.242–1.607) times population risk. Conclusion: The combined risk score was able to identify individuals at substantially increased risk of pancreatic cancer and to whom targeted screening could be useful.
KW - Clinical Risk
KW - Pancreatic Cancer
KW - Polygenic Risk Score
KW - Risk Prediction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173274708&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gastha.2023.05.008
DO - 10.1016/j.gastha.2023.05.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85173274708
SN - 2772-5723
VL - 2
SP - 979
EP - 989
JO - Gastro Hep Advances
JF - Gastro Hep Advances
IS - 7
ER -