Pralatrexate in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma: a retrospective multicenter study

Mansi Bhurani, Lorenz Admojo, Carrie Van Der Weyden, Robert Twigger, Ali Bazargan, Hang Quach, Allan Zimet, Luke Coyle, Julian Lindsay, Dejan Radeski, Eliza Hawkes, Glen Kennedy, Ian Irving, Naadir Gutta, Judith Trotman, James Yeung, Lindsay Dunlop, Minh Hua, Pratyush Giri, Sam YuenShyam Panicker, Susan Moreton, Liane Khoo, Ashleigh Scott, David Kipp, Andrew McQuillan, Chris McCormack, Michael Dickinson, Henry Miles Prince

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present a retrospective multicenter study of pralatrexate treatment outcomes in an Australian practice setting for patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma who had failed 1+ systemic therapies, treated via a compassionate access program. Endpoints assessed included response rates, toxicities, and subsequent therapies. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and time to best response, were assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis. The study included 31 patients, with median age 69 years. We demonstrated ORR of 35.5% (n = 11), including 4 complete responses (13%) and 7 partial responses (23%). The predicted median OS was 10 months, with EFS of 9 months, and PFS of 9 months. Median TTNT was 8 months. Mucositis was the most commonly observed toxicity. This study–the second largest real-world cohort reported to date–underscores the importance of pralatrexate in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma, as well as its acceptable toxicity profile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)330-336
Number of pages7
JournalLeukemia and Lymphoma
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
  • mucositis
  • peripheral T-cell lymphoma
  • Pralatrexate
  • T-cell lymphoma

Cite this