Practicing handoffs early: Applying a clinical framework in the anatomy laboratory

Michelle D. Lazarus, Jason A. Dos Santos, Paul M. Haidet, Tiffany L. Whitcomb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The anatomy laboratory provides an ideal environment for the integration of clinical contexts as the willed-donor is often regarded as a student's "first patient." This study evaluated an innovative approach to peer teaching in the anatomy laboratory using a clinical handoff context. The authors introduced the "Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation" (SBAR) handoff framework within the anatomy laboratory. Study participants included 147 second-year medical students completing the head and neck portion of an anatomy course. The authors used mixed methods to evaluate the impact of the anatomic SBAR on the student anatomy laboratory experience. Qualitative analysis of student evaluations revealed three themes which emerged from students' summaries of their anatomic handoff experiences: Learning-by-teaching; Acquiescing to doing more with less; and Distrust of the peer handoff process. All the themes demonstrated that the anatomic handoff encouraged students' focus on the knowledge preparation and reflection. Closed question analysis suggested that that students' perceptions of handoff usefulness were tied to deeper learning strategies. The handoff provided a mechanism for promoting students' focus on anatomical relationships and facilitated students' learning of transferable clinical skills. Together, these results suggest that the introduction of a handoff process in anatomy education provided both a mechanism for learning anatomy and a unique opportunity for early exposure to an essential clinical skill. This clinical and basic science integration may serve as a vertical integration thread which can be woven throughout undergraduate medical education. Future study will focus on exploring the long-term impacts and learning outcomes of this integration. Anat Sci Educ 9: 476-487.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-487
Number of pages12
JournalAnatomical Sciences Education
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • anatomical sciences
  • anatomy laboratory
  • clinical context
  • communication skills
  • educational methodology
  • gross anatomy education
  • handoffs
  • medical education
  • nontechnical skills

Cite this

Lazarus, Michelle D. ; Dos Santos, Jason A. ; Haidet, Paul M. ; Whitcomb, Tiffany L. / Practicing handoffs early : Applying a clinical framework in the anatomy laboratory. In: Anatomical Sciences Education. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 5. pp. 476-487.
@article{a786f6f8465c4a2683f6717ae5b2ba46,
title = "Practicing handoffs early: Applying a clinical framework in the anatomy laboratory",
abstract = "The anatomy laboratory provides an ideal environment for the integration of clinical contexts as the willed-donor is often regarded as a student's {"}first patient.{"} This study evaluated an innovative approach to peer teaching in the anatomy laboratory using a clinical handoff context. The authors introduced the {"}Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation{"} (SBAR) handoff framework within the anatomy laboratory. Study participants included 147 second-year medical students completing the head and neck portion of an anatomy course. The authors used mixed methods to evaluate the impact of the anatomic SBAR on the student anatomy laboratory experience. Qualitative analysis of student evaluations revealed three themes which emerged from students' summaries of their anatomic handoff experiences: Learning-by-teaching; Acquiescing to doing more with less; and Distrust of the peer handoff process. All the themes demonstrated that the anatomic handoff encouraged students' focus on the knowledge preparation and reflection. Closed question analysis suggested that that students' perceptions of handoff usefulness were tied to deeper learning strategies. The handoff provided a mechanism for promoting students' focus on anatomical relationships and facilitated students' learning of transferable clinical skills. Together, these results suggest that the introduction of a handoff process in anatomy education provided both a mechanism for learning anatomy and a unique opportunity for early exposure to an essential clinical skill. This clinical and basic science integration may serve as a vertical integration thread which can be woven throughout undergraduate medical education. Future study will focus on exploring the long-term impacts and learning outcomes of this integration. Anat Sci Educ 9: 476-487.",
keywords = "anatomical sciences, anatomy laboratory, clinical context, communication skills, educational methodology, gross anatomy education, handoffs, medical education, nontechnical skills",
author = "Lazarus, {Michelle D.} and {Dos Santos}, {Jason A.} and Haidet, {Paul M.} and Whitcomb, {Tiffany L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ase.1595",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "476--487",
journal = "Anatomical Sciences Education",
issn = "1935-9772",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Practicing handoffs early : Applying a clinical framework in the anatomy laboratory. / Lazarus, Michelle D.; Dos Santos, Jason A.; Haidet, Paul M.; Whitcomb, Tiffany L.

In: Anatomical Sciences Education, Vol. 9, No. 5, 01.10.2016, p. 476-487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practicing handoffs early

T2 - Applying a clinical framework in the anatomy laboratory

AU - Lazarus, Michelle D.

AU - Dos Santos, Jason A.

AU - Haidet, Paul M.

AU - Whitcomb, Tiffany L.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - The anatomy laboratory provides an ideal environment for the integration of clinical contexts as the willed-donor is often regarded as a student's "first patient." This study evaluated an innovative approach to peer teaching in the anatomy laboratory using a clinical handoff context. The authors introduced the "Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation" (SBAR) handoff framework within the anatomy laboratory. Study participants included 147 second-year medical students completing the head and neck portion of an anatomy course. The authors used mixed methods to evaluate the impact of the anatomic SBAR on the student anatomy laboratory experience. Qualitative analysis of student evaluations revealed three themes which emerged from students' summaries of their anatomic handoff experiences: Learning-by-teaching; Acquiescing to doing more with less; and Distrust of the peer handoff process. All the themes demonstrated that the anatomic handoff encouraged students' focus on the knowledge preparation and reflection. Closed question analysis suggested that that students' perceptions of handoff usefulness were tied to deeper learning strategies. The handoff provided a mechanism for promoting students' focus on anatomical relationships and facilitated students' learning of transferable clinical skills. Together, these results suggest that the introduction of a handoff process in anatomy education provided both a mechanism for learning anatomy and a unique opportunity for early exposure to an essential clinical skill. This clinical and basic science integration may serve as a vertical integration thread which can be woven throughout undergraduate medical education. Future study will focus on exploring the long-term impacts and learning outcomes of this integration. Anat Sci Educ 9: 476-487.

AB - The anatomy laboratory provides an ideal environment for the integration of clinical contexts as the willed-donor is often regarded as a student's "first patient." This study evaluated an innovative approach to peer teaching in the anatomy laboratory using a clinical handoff context. The authors introduced the "Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation" (SBAR) handoff framework within the anatomy laboratory. Study participants included 147 second-year medical students completing the head and neck portion of an anatomy course. The authors used mixed methods to evaluate the impact of the anatomic SBAR on the student anatomy laboratory experience. Qualitative analysis of student evaluations revealed three themes which emerged from students' summaries of their anatomic handoff experiences: Learning-by-teaching; Acquiescing to doing more with less; and Distrust of the peer handoff process. All the themes demonstrated that the anatomic handoff encouraged students' focus on the knowledge preparation and reflection. Closed question analysis suggested that that students' perceptions of handoff usefulness were tied to deeper learning strategies. The handoff provided a mechanism for promoting students' focus on anatomical relationships and facilitated students' learning of transferable clinical skills. Together, these results suggest that the introduction of a handoff process in anatomy education provided both a mechanism for learning anatomy and a unique opportunity for early exposure to an essential clinical skill. This clinical and basic science integration may serve as a vertical integration thread which can be woven throughout undergraduate medical education. Future study will focus on exploring the long-term impacts and learning outcomes of this integration. Anat Sci Educ 9: 476-487.

KW - anatomical sciences

KW - anatomy laboratory

KW - clinical context

KW - communication skills

KW - educational methodology

KW - gross anatomy education

KW - handoffs

KW - medical education

KW - nontechnical skills

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984644916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ase.1595

DO - 10.1002/ase.1595

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 476

EP - 487

JO - Anatomical Sciences Education

JF - Anatomical Sciences Education

SN - 1935-9772

IS - 5

ER -