Potentially modifiable respiratory variables contributing to outcome in ICU patients without ARDS: a secondary analysis of PRoVENT

Fabienne D. Simonis, Carmen S.V. Barbas, Antonio Artigas-Raventós, Jaume Canet, Rogier M. Determann, James Anstey, Goran Hedenstierna, Sabrine N.T. Hemmes, Greet Hermans, Michael Hiesmayr, Markus W. Hollmann, Samir Jaber, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Gary H. Mills, Rupert M. Pearse, Christian Putensen, Werner Schmid, Paolo Severgnini, Roger Smith, Tanja A. TreschanEdda M. Tschernko, Marcos F. Vidal Melo, Hermann Wrigge, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Paolo Pelosi, Marcus J. Schultz, Ary Serpa Neto, for the PRoVENT investigators, The PROVE Network investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)


Background: The majority of critically ill patients do not suffer from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). To improve the treatment of these patients, we aimed to identify potentially modifiable factors associated with outcome of these patients. Methods: The PRoVENT was an international, multicenter, prospective cohort study of consecutive patients under invasive mechanical ventilatory support. A predefined secondary analysis was to examine factors associated with mortality. The primary endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Results: 935 Patients were included. In-hospital mortality was 21%. Compared to patients who died, patients who survived had a lower risk of ARDS according to the ‘Lung Injury Prediction Score’ and received lower maximum airway pressure (Pmax), driving pressure (ΔP), positive end-expiratory pressure, and FiO2 levels. Tidal volume size was similar between the groups. Higher Pmax was a potentially modifiable ventilatory variable associated with in-hospital mortality in multivariable analyses. ΔP was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality, but reliable values for ΔP were available for 343 patients only. Non-modifiable factors associated with in-hospital mortality were older age, presence of immunosuppression, higher non-pulmonary sequential organ failure assessment scores, lower pulse oximetry readings, higher heart rates, and functional dependence. Conclusions: Higher Pmax was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients under mechanical ventilatory support for reasons other than ARDS. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01868321).

Original languageEnglish
Article number39
Number of pages12
JournalAnnals of Intensive Care
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes


  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Mortality
  • Outcome
  • Ventilator settings

Cite this

Simonis, F. D., Barbas, C. S. V., Artigas-Raventós, A., Canet, J., Determann, R. M., Anstey, J., Hedenstierna, G., Hemmes, S. N. T., Hermans, G., Hiesmayr, M., Hollmann, M. W., Jaber, S., Martin-Loeches, I., Mills, G. H., Pearse, R. M., Putensen, C., Schmid, W., Severgnini, P., Smith, R., ... for the PRoVENT investigators, The PROVE Network investigators (2018). Potentially modifiable respiratory variables contributing to outcome in ICU patients without ARDS: a secondary analysis of PRoVENT. Annals of Intensive Care, 8(1), [39]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0385-7