Potential for solar-assisted post-combustion carbon capture in Australia

Abdul Qadir, Marwan Mokhtar, Rajab Khalilpour, Dia Milani, Anthony Vassallo, Matteo Chiesa, Ali Abbas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A techno-economic analysis has been performed for a coal-fired power plant retrofitted with Solvent-based Post-combustion Carbon Capture (PCC) technology which is partially supplied with thermal energy by solar thermal collectors. The plant is compared with a generic PCC plant where all the thermal energy is provided by steam bled from the steam cycle. The individual merits of a suite of solar collector technologies which includes Flat Plate Collectors (FPCs), Compound Parabolic Collectors (CPCs), Linear Fresnel Collectors (LFCs), Evacuated Tube Collectors (ETCs) and Parabolic Trough Collectors (PTCs) to supply thermal energy for the PCC plant have been studied. The plant has been simulated for three different locations in Australia: Sydney, Townsville and Melbourne. The overall system consists of three subsystems: power plant, PCC plant and solar collector field. A base case scenario is studied in which there is no heat integration between the three subsystems and is compared to a system with heat integration. Additionally incentives such as Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), carbon tax/credits and government subsidies have been added to the economic model and a sensitivity analysis performed for each scenario of incentives for all five solar collector technologies at the three locations. The ETC case performs best amongst solar collectors when the three subsystems have heat integration while PTCs perform best in the case with no heat integration. The best location for the solar-assisted PCC (SPCC) plant is Townsville. It was found that the addition of the solar field reduces the carbon tax in order to make carbon capture and storage viable in comparison with a conventional non-capturing coal fired plant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-185
Number of pages11
JournalApplied Energy
Volume111
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Carbon capture
  • Energy
  • Heat integration
  • Power plant
  • Solar thermal
  • Techno-economics

Cite this

Qadir, A., Mokhtar, M., Khalilpour, R., Milani, D., Vassallo, A., Chiesa, M., & Abbas, A. (2013). Potential for solar-assisted post-combustion carbon capture in Australia. Applied Energy, 111, 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.079
Qadir, Abdul ; Mokhtar, Marwan ; Khalilpour, Rajab ; Milani, Dia ; Vassallo, Anthony ; Chiesa, Matteo ; Abbas, Ali. / Potential for solar-assisted post-combustion carbon capture in Australia. In: Applied Energy. 2013 ; Vol. 111. pp. 175-185.
@article{f885d5e9a943429b91d7c16aa1b76d8d,
title = "Potential for solar-assisted post-combustion carbon capture in Australia",
abstract = "A techno-economic analysis has been performed for a coal-fired power plant retrofitted with Solvent-based Post-combustion Carbon Capture (PCC) technology which is partially supplied with thermal energy by solar thermal collectors. The plant is compared with a generic PCC plant where all the thermal energy is provided by steam bled from the steam cycle. The individual merits of a suite of solar collector technologies which includes Flat Plate Collectors (FPCs), Compound Parabolic Collectors (CPCs), Linear Fresnel Collectors (LFCs), Evacuated Tube Collectors (ETCs) and Parabolic Trough Collectors (PTCs) to supply thermal energy for the PCC plant have been studied. The plant has been simulated for three different locations in Australia: Sydney, Townsville and Melbourne. The overall system consists of three subsystems: power plant, PCC plant and solar collector field. A base case scenario is studied in which there is no heat integration between the three subsystems and is compared to a system with heat integration. Additionally incentives such as Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), carbon tax/credits and government subsidies have been added to the economic model and a sensitivity analysis performed for each scenario of incentives for all five solar collector technologies at the three locations. The ETC case performs best amongst solar collectors when the three subsystems have heat integration while PTCs perform best in the case with no heat integration. The best location for the solar-assisted PCC (SPCC) plant is Townsville. It was found that the addition of the solar field reduces the carbon tax in order to make carbon capture and storage viable in comparison with a conventional non-capturing coal fired plant.",
keywords = "Carbon capture, Energy, Heat integration, Power plant, Solar thermal, Techno-economics",
author = "Abdul Qadir and Marwan Mokhtar and Rajab Khalilpour and Dia Milani and Anthony Vassallo and Matteo Chiesa and Ali Abbas",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.079",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "175--185",
journal = "Applied Energy",
issn = "0306-2619",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Qadir, A, Mokhtar, M, Khalilpour, R, Milani, D, Vassallo, A, Chiesa, M & Abbas, A 2013, 'Potential for solar-assisted post-combustion carbon capture in Australia' Applied Energy, vol. 111, pp. 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.079

Potential for solar-assisted post-combustion carbon capture in Australia. / Qadir, Abdul; Mokhtar, Marwan; Khalilpour, Rajab; Milani, Dia; Vassallo, Anthony; Chiesa, Matteo; Abbas, Ali.

In: Applied Energy, Vol. 111, 11.2013, p. 175-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential for solar-assisted post-combustion carbon capture in Australia

AU - Qadir, Abdul

AU - Mokhtar, Marwan

AU - Khalilpour, Rajab

AU - Milani, Dia

AU - Vassallo, Anthony

AU - Chiesa, Matteo

AU - Abbas, Ali

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - A techno-economic analysis has been performed for a coal-fired power plant retrofitted with Solvent-based Post-combustion Carbon Capture (PCC) technology which is partially supplied with thermal energy by solar thermal collectors. The plant is compared with a generic PCC plant where all the thermal energy is provided by steam bled from the steam cycle. The individual merits of a suite of solar collector technologies which includes Flat Plate Collectors (FPCs), Compound Parabolic Collectors (CPCs), Linear Fresnel Collectors (LFCs), Evacuated Tube Collectors (ETCs) and Parabolic Trough Collectors (PTCs) to supply thermal energy for the PCC plant have been studied. The plant has been simulated for three different locations in Australia: Sydney, Townsville and Melbourne. The overall system consists of three subsystems: power plant, PCC plant and solar collector field. A base case scenario is studied in which there is no heat integration between the three subsystems and is compared to a system with heat integration. Additionally incentives such as Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), carbon tax/credits and government subsidies have been added to the economic model and a sensitivity analysis performed for each scenario of incentives for all five solar collector technologies at the three locations. The ETC case performs best amongst solar collectors when the three subsystems have heat integration while PTCs perform best in the case with no heat integration. The best location for the solar-assisted PCC (SPCC) plant is Townsville. It was found that the addition of the solar field reduces the carbon tax in order to make carbon capture and storage viable in comparison with a conventional non-capturing coal fired plant.

AB - A techno-economic analysis has been performed for a coal-fired power plant retrofitted with Solvent-based Post-combustion Carbon Capture (PCC) technology which is partially supplied with thermal energy by solar thermal collectors. The plant is compared with a generic PCC plant where all the thermal energy is provided by steam bled from the steam cycle. The individual merits of a suite of solar collector technologies which includes Flat Plate Collectors (FPCs), Compound Parabolic Collectors (CPCs), Linear Fresnel Collectors (LFCs), Evacuated Tube Collectors (ETCs) and Parabolic Trough Collectors (PTCs) to supply thermal energy for the PCC plant have been studied. The plant has been simulated for three different locations in Australia: Sydney, Townsville and Melbourne. The overall system consists of three subsystems: power plant, PCC plant and solar collector field. A base case scenario is studied in which there is no heat integration between the three subsystems and is compared to a system with heat integration. Additionally incentives such as Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), carbon tax/credits and government subsidies have been added to the economic model and a sensitivity analysis performed for each scenario of incentives for all five solar collector technologies at the three locations. The ETC case performs best amongst solar collectors when the three subsystems have heat integration while PTCs perform best in the case with no heat integration. The best location for the solar-assisted PCC (SPCC) plant is Townsville. It was found that the addition of the solar field reduces the carbon tax in order to make carbon capture and storage viable in comparison with a conventional non-capturing coal fired plant.

KW - Carbon capture

KW - Energy

KW - Heat integration

KW - Power plant

KW - Solar thermal

KW - Techno-economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878492483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.079

DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.079

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 175

EP - 185

JO - Applied Energy

JF - Applied Energy

SN - 0306-2619

ER -