TY - JOUR
T1 - Potential effect of antiseptic mouthwash on the incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae among men who have sex with men
T2 - A mathematical modelling study
AU - Xu, Xianglong
AU - Chow, Eric P.F.
AU - Shen, Mingwang
AU - Zou, Zhuoru
AU - Wang, Chongjian
AU - Ong, Jason J.
AU - Fairley, Christopher K.
AU - Zhang, Lei
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding EPFC is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant (GNT1172873). JJO is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (GNT1104781). MS is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 11801435), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant number: 2018M631134), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant numbers: xjh012019055, xzy032020026) and the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (grant number: 2019JQ-187). CKF is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Leadership Investigator Grant (GNT1172900). LZ is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 81950410639); the Outstanding Young Scholars Support Program (grant number: 3111500001); the Xi’an Jiaotong University Basic Research and Profession Grant (grant numbers: xtr022019003, xzy032020032); the Epidemiology Modeling and Risk Assessment (grant number: 20200344); and the Xi’an Jiaotong University Young Scholar Support Grant (grant number: YX6J004).
Publisher Copyright:
©
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Objectives The incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and its antimicrobial resistance is increasing in many countries. Antibacterial mouthwash may reduce gonorrhoea transmission without using antibiotics. We modelled the effect that antiseptic mouthwash may have on the incidence of gonorrhoea. Design We developed a mathematical model of the transmission of gonorrhoea between each anatomical site (oropharynx, urethra and anorectum) in men who have sex with men (MSM). We constructed four scenarios: (1) mouthwash had no effect; (2) mouthwash increased the susceptibility of the oropharynx; (3) mouthwash reduced the transmissibility from the oropharynx; (4) the combined effect of mouthwash from scenarios 2 and 3. Setting We used data at three anatomical sites from 4873 MSM attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in 2018 and 2019 to calibrate our models and data from the USA, Netherlands and Thailand for sensitivity analyses. Participants Published available data on MSM with multisite infections of gonorrhoea. Primary and secondary outcome measures Incidence of gonorrhoea. Results The overall incidence of gonorrhoea was 44 (95% CI 37 to 50)/100 person-years (PY) in scenario 1. Under scenario 2 (20%-80% mouthwash coverage), the total incidence increased (47-60/100 PY) and at all three anatomical sites by between 7.4% (5.9%-60.8%) and 136.6% (108.1%-177.5%). Under scenario 3, with the same coverage, the total incidence decreased (20-39/100 PY) and at all anatomical sites by between 11.6% (10.2%-13.5%) and 99.8% (99.2%-100%). Under scenario 4, changes in the incidence depended on the efficacy of mouthwash on the susceptibility or transmissibility. The effect on the total incidence varied (22-55/100 PY), and at all anatomical sites, there were increases of nearly 130% and large declines of almost 100%. Conclusions The effect of mouthwash on gonorrhoea incidence is largely predictable depending on whether it increases susceptibility to or reduces the transmissibility of gonorrhoea.
AB - Objectives The incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and its antimicrobial resistance is increasing in many countries. Antibacterial mouthwash may reduce gonorrhoea transmission without using antibiotics. We modelled the effect that antiseptic mouthwash may have on the incidence of gonorrhoea. Design We developed a mathematical model of the transmission of gonorrhoea between each anatomical site (oropharynx, urethra and anorectum) in men who have sex with men (MSM). We constructed four scenarios: (1) mouthwash had no effect; (2) mouthwash increased the susceptibility of the oropharynx; (3) mouthwash reduced the transmissibility from the oropharynx; (4) the combined effect of mouthwash from scenarios 2 and 3. Setting We used data at three anatomical sites from 4873 MSM attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in 2018 and 2019 to calibrate our models and data from the USA, Netherlands and Thailand for sensitivity analyses. Participants Published available data on MSM with multisite infections of gonorrhoea. Primary and secondary outcome measures Incidence of gonorrhoea. Results The overall incidence of gonorrhoea was 44 (95% CI 37 to 50)/100 person-years (PY) in scenario 1. Under scenario 2 (20%-80% mouthwash coverage), the total incidence increased (47-60/100 PY) and at all three anatomical sites by between 7.4% (5.9%-60.8%) and 136.6% (108.1%-177.5%). Under scenario 3, with the same coverage, the total incidence decreased (20-39/100 PY) and at all anatomical sites by between 11.6% (10.2%-13.5%) and 99.8% (99.2%-100%). Under scenario 4, changes in the incidence depended on the efficacy of mouthwash on the susceptibility or transmissibility. The effect on the total incidence varied (22-55/100 PY), and at all anatomical sites, there were increases of nearly 130% and large declines of almost 100%. Conclusions The effect of mouthwash on gonorrhoea incidence is largely predictable depending on whether it increases susceptibility to or reduces the transmissibility of gonorrhoea.
KW - epidemiology
KW - infection control
KW - public health
KW - sexual medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117113552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052823
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052823
M3 - Article
C2 - 34620667
AN - SCOPUS:85117113552
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 11
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 10
M1 - e052823
ER -
