Postwar immigration and assimilation: A reconceptualisation

Andrew Barry Markus, Margaret Sarah Taft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The postwar immigration programme in Australia was a bold and visionary nationbuilding exercise, one that promised rapid assimilation of aliens. Some historians note deficiencies in the metanarrative of postwar immigration, but then fail to explain the contradictions which have become apparent. This article attempts to resolve those contradictions, by arguing that a distinction needs to be made between the rhetoric employed in selling the benefits of immigration to the Australian public and the implementation of policy. Assimilation policy was poorly conceived, illdefined and without financial or human resources for meaningful implementation. Government concern was with public opinion and with overseas recruitment of workers and labour control in Australia. (c) 2015 (c) 2015 Taylor Francis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234 - 251
Number of pages18
JournalAustralian Historical Studies
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

Markus, Andrew Barry ; Taft, Margaret Sarah. / Postwar immigration and assimilation: A reconceptualisation. In: Australian Historical Studies. 2015 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 234 - 251.
@article{346a0123e7ae4c40857218690b3ed9d5,
title = "Postwar immigration and assimilation: A reconceptualisation",
abstract = "The postwar immigration programme in Australia was a bold and visionary nationbuilding exercise, one that promised rapid assimilation of aliens. Some historians note deficiencies in the metanarrative of postwar immigration, but then fail to explain the contradictions which have become apparent. This article attempts to resolve those contradictions, by arguing that a distinction needs to be made between the rhetoric employed in selling the benefits of immigration to the Australian public and the implementation of policy. Assimilation policy was poorly conceived, illdefined and without financial or human resources for meaningful implementation. Government concern was with public opinion and with overseas recruitment of workers and labour control in Australia. (c) 2015 (c) 2015 Taylor Francis.",
author = "Markus, {Andrew Barry} and Taft, {Margaret Sarah}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/1031461X.2015.1035288",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "234 -- 251",
journal = "Australian Historical Studies",
issn = "1031-461X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Postwar immigration and assimilation: A reconceptualisation. / Markus, Andrew Barry; Taft, Margaret Sarah.

In: Australian Historical Studies, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2015, p. 234 - 251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postwar immigration and assimilation: A reconceptualisation

AU - Markus, Andrew Barry

AU - Taft, Margaret Sarah

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The postwar immigration programme in Australia was a bold and visionary nationbuilding exercise, one that promised rapid assimilation of aliens. Some historians note deficiencies in the metanarrative of postwar immigration, but then fail to explain the contradictions which have become apparent. This article attempts to resolve those contradictions, by arguing that a distinction needs to be made between the rhetoric employed in selling the benefits of immigration to the Australian public and the implementation of policy. Assimilation policy was poorly conceived, illdefined and without financial or human resources for meaningful implementation. Government concern was with public opinion and with overseas recruitment of workers and labour control in Australia. (c) 2015 (c) 2015 Taylor Francis.

AB - The postwar immigration programme in Australia was a bold and visionary nationbuilding exercise, one that promised rapid assimilation of aliens. Some historians note deficiencies in the metanarrative of postwar immigration, but then fail to explain the contradictions which have become apparent. This article attempts to resolve those contradictions, by arguing that a distinction needs to be made between the rhetoric employed in selling the benefits of immigration to the Australian public and the implementation of policy. Assimilation policy was poorly conceived, illdefined and without financial or human resources for meaningful implementation. Government concern was with public opinion and with overseas recruitment of workers and labour control in Australia. (c) 2015 (c) 2015 Taylor Francis.

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1031461X.2015.1035288

U2 - 10.1080/1031461X.2015.1035288

DO - 10.1080/1031461X.2015.1035288

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 234

EP - 251

JO - Australian Historical Studies

JF - Australian Historical Studies

SN - 1031-461X

IS - 2

ER -