Postnatal development of baroreflex sensitivity in infancy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) using spontaneous sequence analysis in the time domain is not fully applicable in infancy, as the time delay for heart period to change (heart period delay, HPD) after an arterial pressure change is unknown. We estimated and compared HPD and BRS in the frequency (BRS(sp), HPD(sp)) and time domains (BRS(seq), HPD(seq)) from systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart period fluctuations. Continuous SBP, using photoplethysmography, and heart period measurements were performed on 30 term infants at 2-4 weeks, 2-3 months and 5-6 months postnatal age. Cross-spectral analysis between SBP and heart period fluctuations was used to estimate BRS(sp) and HPD(sp). Spontaneous sequence analysis was used to estimate BRS using a fixed beat delay of 1-12 beats (BRS(seq)) or a variable delay identified by a novel method accounting for epoch-epoch variability in HPD (BRS(seqvar)). HPD(sp) averaged 3.4 s (approximately 7 beats); BRS(sp) averaged 11.4 ms mmHg(1). BRS(seq) and BRS(seqvar) were consistently lower than BRS(sp) (P <0.05), but the three BRS estimates were strongly correlated using a HPD of approximately 5-6 beats. BRS(seqvar) resulted in the average estimate (8.9 ms mmHg(1)) closest to BRS(sp) and overall had the strongest correlation with BRS(sp) (R(2) = 0.61; P <0.001). All three BRS estimates increased progressively with postnatal age, with BRS(sp) averaging 6.4, 10.5 and 16.0 ms mmHg(1) at 2-4 weeks, 2-3 months and 5-6 months, respectively (P <0.05). Accounting for the HPD of infancy provides estimates of BRS in the time domain that closely parallel spectral estimates, and provides a novel analytical tool to assess normal development and dysfunction of the baroreflex in infants.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2193 - 2203
Number of pages11
JournalThe Journal of Physiology
Volume588
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Cite this

@article{1d5215ffc5f64e0d9f5bb6fb389b9393,
title = "Postnatal development of baroreflex sensitivity in infancy",
abstract = "Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) using spontaneous sequence analysis in the time domain is not fully applicable in infancy, as the time delay for heart period to change (heart period delay, HPD) after an arterial pressure change is unknown. We estimated and compared HPD and BRS in the frequency (BRS(sp), HPD(sp)) and time domains (BRS(seq), HPD(seq)) from systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart period fluctuations. Continuous SBP, using photoplethysmography, and heart period measurements were performed on 30 term infants at 2-4 weeks, 2-3 months and 5-6 months postnatal age. Cross-spectral analysis between SBP and heart period fluctuations was used to estimate BRS(sp) and HPD(sp). Spontaneous sequence analysis was used to estimate BRS using a fixed beat delay of 1-12 beats (BRS(seq)) or a variable delay identified by a novel method accounting for epoch-epoch variability in HPD (BRS(seqvar)). HPD(sp) averaged 3.4 s (approximately 7 beats); BRS(sp) averaged 11.4 ms mmHg(1). BRS(seq) and BRS(seqvar) were consistently lower than BRS(sp) (P <0.05), but the three BRS estimates were strongly correlated using a HPD of approximately 5-6 beats. BRS(seqvar) resulted in the average estimate (8.9 ms mmHg(1)) closest to BRS(sp) and overall had the strongest correlation with BRS(sp) (R(2) = 0.61; P <0.001). All three BRS estimates increased progressively with postnatal age, with BRS(sp) averaging 6.4, 10.5 and 16.0 ms mmHg(1) at 2-4 weeks, 2-3 months and 5-6 months, respectively (P <0.05). Accounting for the HPD of infancy provides estimates of BRS in the time domain that closely parallel spectral estimates, and provides a novel analytical tool to assess normal development and dysfunction of the baroreflex in infants.",
author = "Stephanie Yiallourou and Scott Sands and Walker, {Adrian Mark} and Horne, {Rosemary Sylvia Claire}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1113/jphysiol.2010.187070",
language = "English",
volume = "588",
pages = "2193 -- 2203",
journal = "The Journal of Physiology",
issn = "0022-3751",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

Postnatal development of baroreflex sensitivity in infancy. / Yiallourou, Stephanie; Sands, Scott; Walker, Adrian Mark; Horne, Rosemary Sylvia Claire.

In: The Journal of Physiology, Vol. 588, No. 12, 2010, p. 2193 - 2203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postnatal development of baroreflex sensitivity in infancy

AU - Yiallourou, Stephanie

AU - Sands, Scott

AU - Walker, Adrian Mark

AU - Horne, Rosemary Sylvia Claire

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) using spontaneous sequence analysis in the time domain is not fully applicable in infancy, as the time delay for heart period to change (heart period delay, HPD) after an arterial pressure change is unknown. We estimated and compared HPD and BRS in the frequency (BRS(sp), HPD(sp)) and time domains (BRS(seq), HPD(seq)) from systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart period fluctuations. Continuous SBP, using photoplethysmography, and heart period measurements were performed on 30 term infants at 2-4 weeks, 2-3 months and 5-6 months postnatal age. Cross-spectral analysis between SBP and heart period fluctuations was used to estimate BRS(sp) and HPD(sp). Spontaneous sequence analysis was used to estimate BRS using a fixed beat delay of 1-12 beats (BRS(seq)) or a variable delay identified by a novel method accounting for epoch-epoch variability in HPD (BRS(seqvar)). HPD(sp) averaged 3.4 s (approximately 7 beats); BRS(sp) averaged 11.4 ms mmHg(1). BRS(seq) and BRS(seqvar) were consistently lower than BRS(sp) (P <0.05), but the three BRS estimates were strongly correlated using a HPD of approximately 5-6 beats. BRS(seqvar) resulted in the average estimate (8.9 ms mmHg(1)) closest to BRS(sp) and overall had the strongest correlation with BRS(sp) (R(2) = 0.61; P <0.001). All three BRS estimates increased progressively with postnatal age, with BRS(sp) averaging 6.4, 10.5 and 16.0 ms mmHg(1) at 2-4 weeks, 2-3 months and 5-6 months, respectively (P <0.05). Accounting for the HPD of infancy provides estimates of BRS in the time domain that closely parallel spectral estimates, and provides a novel analytical tool to assess normal development and dysfunction of the baroreflex in infants.

AB - Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) using spontaneous sequence analysis in the time domain is not fully applicable in infancy, as the time delay for heart period to change (heart period delay, HPD) after an arterial pressure change is unknown. We estimated and compared HPD and BRS in the frequency (BRS(sp), HPD(sp)) and time domains (BRS(seq), HPD(seq)) from systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart period fluctuations. Continuous SBP, using photoplethysmography, and heart period measurements were performed on 30 term infants at 2-4 weeks, 2-3 months and 5-6 months postnatal age. Cross-spectral analysis between SBP and heart period fluctuations was used to estimate BRS(sp) and HPD(sp). Spontaneous sequence analysis was used to estimate BRS using a fixed beat delay of 1-12 beats (BRS(seq)) or a variable delay identified by a novel method accounting for epoch-epoch variability in HPD (BRS(seqvar)). HPD(sp) averaged 3.4 s (approximately 7 beats); BRS(sp) averaged 11.4 ms mmHg(1). BRS(seq) and BRS(seqvar) were consistently lower than BRS(sp) (P <0.05), but the three BRS estimates were strongly correlated using a HPD of approximately 5-6 beats. BRS(seqvar) resulted in the average estimate (8.9 ms mmHg(1)) closest to BRS(sp) and overall had the strongest correlation with BRS(sp) (R(2) = 0.61; P <0.001). All three BRS estimates increased progressively with postnatal age, with BRS(sp) averaging 6.4, 10.5 and 16.0 ms mmHg(1) at 2-4 weeks, 2-3 months and 5-6 months, respectively (P <0.05). Accounting for the HPD of infancy provides estimates of BRS in the time domain that closely parallel spectral estimates, and provides a novel analytical tool to assess normal development and dysfunction of the baroreflex in infants.

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/jphysiol.2010.187070/pdf

U2 - 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.187070

DO - 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.187070

M3 - Article

VL - 588

SP - 2193

EP - 2203

JO - The Journal of Physiology

JF - The Journal of Physiology

SN - 0022-3751

IS - 12

ER -