Positive expiratory pressure via mask does not improve ventilation inhomogeneity more than huffing and coughing in individuals with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic sputum expectoration

Christian Osadnik, Christopher Richard Stuart-Andrews, Samantha J Ellis, Bruce Robert Thompson, Christine F McDonald, Anne E Holland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) has been used to promote airway clearance in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for many years; however, its mechanism of action and benefits are unclear. Previous authors have suggested that PEP improves collateral ventilation via changes in lung volumes. Objectives: It was the aim of this study to determine whether PEP improves ventilation inhomogeneity more than controlled huffing and coughing in individuals with stable COPD.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-44
Number of pages7
JournalRespiration
Volume87
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

@article{042b1043ab0b41b8b620ece84878eea4,
title = "Positive expiratory pressure via mask does not improve ventilation inhomogeneity more than huffing and coughing in individuals with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic sputum expectoration",
abstract = "Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) has been used to promote airway clearance in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for many years; however, its mechanism of action and benefits are unclear. Previous authors have suggested that PEP improves collateral ventilation via changes in lung volumes. Objectives: It was the aim of this study to determine whether PEP improves ventilation inhomogeneity more than controlled huffing and coughing in individuals with stable COPD.",
author = "Christian Osadnik and Stuart-Andrews, {Christopher Richard} and Ellis, {Samantha J} and Thompson, {Bruce Robert} and McDonald, {Christine F} and Holland, {Anne E}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1159/000348546",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "38--44",
journal = "Respiration",
issn = "0025-7931",
publisher = "Karger",
number = "1",

}

Positive expiratory pressure via mask does not improve ventilation inhomogeneity more than huffing and coughing in individuals with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic sputum expectoration. / Osadnik, Christian; Stuart-Andrews, Christopher Richard; Ellis, Samantha J; Thompson, Bruce Robert; McDonald, Christine F; Holland, Anne E.

In: Respiration, Vol. 87, No. 1, 2014, p. 38-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Positive expiratory pressure via mask does not improve ventilation inhomogeneity more than huffing and coughing in individuals with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic sputum expectoration

AU - Osadnik, Christian

AU - Stuart-Andrews, Christopher Richard

AU - Ellis, Samantha J

AU - Thompson, Bruce Robert

AU - McDonald, Christine F

AU - Holland, Anne E

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) has been used to promote airway clearance in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for many years; however, its mechanism of action and benefits are unclear. Previous authors have suggested that PEP improves collateral ventilation via changes in lung volumes. Objectives: It was the aim of this study to determine whether PEP improves ventilation inhomogeneity more than controlled huffing and coughing in individuals with stable COPD.

AB - Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) has been used to promote airway clearance in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for many years; however, its mechanism of action and benefits are unclear. Previous authors have suggested that PEP improves collateral ventilation via changes in lung volumes. Objectives: It was the aim of this study to determine whether PEP improves ventilation inhomogeneity more than controlled huffing and coughing in individuals with stable COPD.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23752553

U2 - 10.1159/000348546

DO - 10.1159/000348546

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 38

EP - 44

JO - Respiration

JF - Respiration

SN - 0025-7931

IS - 1

ER -