Poorer outcomes and greater healthcare costs for hospitalised older people with dementia and delirium

a retrospective cohort study

Joanne Tropea, Dina LoGiudice, Danny Liew, Alexandra Gorelik, Caroline Brand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare healthcare utilisation outcomes among older hospitalised patients with and without cognitive impairment, and to compare the costs associated with these outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of administrative data from a large teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2012. People with cognitive impairment were defined as having dementia or delirium coded during the admission. Outcome measures included length of stay, unplanned readmissions within 28 days and costs associated with these outcomes. Regression analysis was used to compare differences between those with and without cognitive impairment. Results: There were 93 300 hospital admissions included in the analysis. 6459 (6.9%) involved cognitively impaired patients. The adjusted median length of stay was significantly higher for the cognitively impaired group compared with the non-cognitively impaired group (7.4 days 6.7–10.0 vs 6.6 days, interquartile range 5.7–8.3; p < 0.001). There were no differences in odds of 28-day readmission. When only those discharged back to their usual residence were included in the analysis, the risk of 28-day readmission was significantly higher for those with cognitive impairment compared with those without. The cost of admissions involving patients with cognitive impairment was 51% higher than the cost of those without cognitive impairment. Conclusions: Hospitalised people with cognitive impairment experience significantly greater length of stay and when discharged to their usual residence are more likely to be readmitted to hospital within 28 days compared with those without cognitive impairment. The costs associated with hospital episodes and 28-day readmissions are significantly higher for those with cognitive impairment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)539-547
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cognitive impairment
  • delirium
  • dementia
  • health care costs
  • hospital readmissions
  • hospitalisation
  • in-hospital complications
  • length of stay

Cite this

@article{606c28c517224515b9cff5fcbc20a21e,
title = "Poorer outcomes and greater healthcare costs for hospitalised older people with dementia and delirium: a retrospective cohort study",
abstract = "Objective: To compare healthcare utilisation outcomes among older hospitalised patients with and without cognitive impairment, and to compare the costs associated with these outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of administrative data from a large teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2012. People with cognitive impairment were defined as having dementia or delirium coded during the admission. Outcome measures included length of stay, unplanned readmissions within 28 days and costs associated with these outcomes. Regression analysis was used to compare differences between those with and without cognitive impairment. Results: There were 93 300 hospital admissions included in the analysis. 6459 (6.9{\%}) involved cognitively impaired patients. The adjusted median length of stay was significantly higher for the cognitively impaired group compared with the non-cognitively impaired group (7.4 days 6.7–10.0 vs 6.6 days, interquartile range 5.7–8.3; p < 0.001). There were no differences in odds of 28-day readmission. When only those discharged back to their usual residence were included in the analysis, the risk of 28-day readmission was significantly higher for those with cognitive impairment compared with those without. The cost of admissions involving patients with cognitive impairment was 51{\%} higher than the cost of those without cognitive impairment. Conclusions: Hospitalised people with cognitive impairment experience significantly greater length of stay and when discharged to their usual residence are more likely to be readmitted to hospital within 28 days compared with those without cognitive impairment. The costs associated with hospital episodes and 28-day readmissions are significantly higher for those with cognitive impairment.",
keywords = "cognitive impairment, delirium, dementia, health care costs, hospital readmissions, hospitalisation, in-hospital complications, length of stay",
author = "Joanne Tropea and Dina LoGiudice and Danny Liew and Alexandra Gorelik and Caroline Brand",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/gps.4491",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "539--547",
journal = "International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "0885-6230",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Poorer outcomes and greater healthcare costs for hospitalised older people with dementia and delirium : a retrospective cohort study. / Tropea, Joanne; LoGiudice, Dina; Liew, Danny; Gorelik, Alexandra; Brand, Caroline.

In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 32, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 539-547.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Poorer outcomes and greater healthcare costs for hospitalised older people with dementia and delirium

T2 - a retrospective cohort study

AU - Tropea, Joanne

AU - LoGiudice, Dina

AU - Liew, Danny

AU - Gorelik, Alexandra

AU - Brand, Caroline

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Objective: To compare healthcare utilisation outcomes among older hospitalised patients with and without cognitive impairment, and to compare the costs associated with these outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of administrative data from a large teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2012. People with cognitive impairment were defined as having dementia or delirium coded during the admission. Outcome measures included length of stay, unplanned readmissions within 28 days and costs associated with these outcomes. Regression analysis was used to compare differences between those with and without cognitive impairment. Results: There were 93 300 hospital admissions included in the analysis. 6459 (6.9%) involved cognitively impaired patients. The adjusted median length of stay was significantly higher for the cognitively impaired group compared with the non-cognitively impaired group (7.4 days 6.7–10.0 vs 6.6 days, interquartile range 5.7–8.3; p < 0.001). There were no differences in odds of 28-day readmission. When only those discharged back to their usual residence were included in the analysis, the risk of 28-day readmission was significantly higher for those with cognitive impairment compared with those without. The cost of admissions involving patients with cognitive impairment was 51% higher than the cost of those without cognitive impairment. Conclusions: Hospitalised people with cognitive impairment experience significantly greater length of stay and when discharged to their usual residence are more likely to be readmitted to hospital within 28 days compared with those without cognitive impairment. The costs associated with hospital episodes and 28-day readmissions are significantly higher for those with cognitive impairment.

AB - Objective: To compare healthcare utilisation outcomes among older hospitalised patients with and without cognitive impairment, and to compare the costs associated with these outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of administrative data from a large teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2012. People with cognitive impairment were defined as having dementia or delirium coded during the admission. Outcome measures included length of stay, unplanned readmissions within 28 days and costs associated with these outcomes. Regression analysis was used to compare differences between those with and without cognitive impairment. Results: There were 93 300 hospital admissions included in the analysis. 6459 (6.9%) involved cognitively impaired patients. The adjusted median length of stay was significantly higher for the cognitively impaired group compared with the non-cognitively impaired group (7.4 days 6.7–10.0 vs 6.6 days, interquartile range 5.7–8.3; p < 0.001). There were no differences in odds of 28-day readmission. When only those discharged back to their usual residence were included in the analysis, the risk of 28-day readmission was significantly higher for those with cognitive impairment compared with those without. The cost of admissions involving patients with cognitive impairment was 51% higher than the cost of those without cognitive impairment. Conclusions: Hospitalised people with cognitive impairment experience significantly greater length of stay and when discharged to their usual residence are more likely to be readmitted to hospital within 28 days compared with those without cognitive impairment. The costs associated with hospital episodes and 28-day readmissions are significantly higher for those with cognitive impairment.

KW - cognitive impairment

KW - delirium

KW - dementia

KW - health care costs

KW - hospital readmissions

KW - hospitalisation

KW - in-hospital complications

KW - length of stay

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017018099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/gps.4491

DO - 10.1002/gps.4491

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 539

EP - 547

JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 0885-6230

IS - 5

ER -