Political satire and the counter-framing of public sector IT project escalation

Jocelyn Cranefield, Gillian Oliver, Jan Pries-Heje

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Despite significant research into why IT projects fail, the frequency and impact of failure remains high. Attention has shifted to understanding and guiding de-escalation (i.e., reversing failure). This major turnaround process initially benefits from negative feedback on the status quo and requires an organization to break its established frames and re-establish its legitimacy with stakeholders (Pan & Pan, 2011). We consider the role of satire as a lens to challenge dominant frames and better understand stakeholders during the shift towards de-escalation based on analyzing political cartoons about high-profile troubled public sector projects in New Zealand and Denmark. Drawing on the theories of technological frames of reference, legitimacy, and stakeholder salience, we show how cartoonists expose and critique the normative framing of dysfunctionality to act as field-level evaluators of legitimacy. Through counter-framing, exaggeration, and metaphor, they emphasize the urgency of citizen users’ claims while undermining the legitimacy of powerful stakeholders. We extract lessons for stakeholder management and communication during project turnaround and suggest that satire could be a valuable addition to diagnostic and planning tools during de-escalation. We identify that sensitivity to framing of IT projects exists in the public realm, which reinforces calls for organizations to consider institutional framing.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7
Pages (from-to)133-158
Number of pages26
JournalCommunications of the Association for Information Systems
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Cartoons
  • De-escalation
  • Escalation
  • Political satire
  • Technological frames of reference

Cite this

@article{86eb05e47dcb4510ba07d9b9d6dab635,
title = "Political satire and the counter-framing of public sector IT project escalation",
abstract = "Despite significant research into why IT projects fail, the frequency and impact of failure remains high. Attention has shifted to understanding and guiding de-escalation (i.e., reversing failure). This major turnaround process initially benefits from negative feedback on the status quo and requires an organization to break its established frames and re-establish its legitimacy with stakeholders (Pan & Pan, 2011). We consider the role of satire as a lens to challenge dominant frames and better understand stakeholders during the shift towards de-escalation based on analyzing political cartoons about high-profile troubled public sector projects in New Zealand and Denmark. Drawing on the theories of technological frames of reference, legitimacy, and stakeholder salience, we show how cartoonists expose and critique the normative framing of dysfunctionality to act as field-level evaluators of legitimacy. Through counter-framing, exaggeration, and metaphor, they emphasize the urgency of citizen users’ claims while undermining the legitimacy of powerful stakeholders. We extract lessons for stakeholder management and communication during project turnaround and suggest that satire could be a valuable addition to diagnostic and planning tools during de-escalation. We identify that sensitivity to framing of IT projects exists in the public realm, which reinforces calls for organizations to consider institutional framing.",
keywords = "Cartoons, De-escalation, Escalation, Political satire, Technological frames of reference",
author = "Jocelyn Cranefield and Gillian Oliver and Jan Pries-Heje",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17705/1CAIS.04307",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "133--158",
journal = "Communications of the Association for Information Systems",
issn = "1529-3181",
publisher = "Association for Information Systems",
number = "1",

}

Political satire and the counter-framing of public sector IT project escalation. / Cranefield, Jocelyn; Oliver, Gillian; Pries-Heje, Jan.

In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 43, No. 1, 7, 01.08.2018, p. 133-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political satire and the counter-framing of public sector IT project escalation

AU - Cranefield, Jocelyn

AU - Oliver, Gillian

AU - Pries-Heje, Jan

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Despite significant research into why IT projects fail, the frequency and impact of failure remains high. Attention has shifted to understanding and guiding de-escalation (i.e., reversing failure). This major turnaround process initially benefits from negative feedback on the status quo and requires an organization to break its established frames and re-establish its legitimacy with stakeholders (Pan & Pan, 2011). We consider the role of satire as a lens to challenge dominant frames and better understand stakeholders during the shift towards de-escalation based on analyzing political cartoons about high-profile troubled public sector projects in New Zealand and Denmark. Drawing on the theories of technological frames of reference, legitimacy, and stakeholder salience, we show how cartoonists expose and critique the normative framing of dysfunctionality to act as field-level evaluators of legitimacy. Through counter-framing, exaggeration, and metaphor, they emphasize the urgency of citizen users’ claims while undermining the legitimacy of powerful stakeholders. We extract lessons for stakeholder management and communication during project turnaround and suggest that satire could be a valuable addition to diagnostic and planning tools during de-escalation. We identify that sensitivity to framing of IT projects exists in the public realm, which reinforces calls for organizations to consider institutional framing.

AB - Despite significant research into why IT projects fail, the frequency and impact of failure remains high. Attention has shifted to understanding and guiding de-escalation (i.e., reversing failure). This major turnaround process initially benefits from negative feedback on the status quo and requires an organization to break its established frames and re-establish its legitimacy with stakeholders (Pan & Pan, 2011). We consider the role of satire as a lens to challenge dominant frames and better understand stakeholders during the shift towards de-escalation based on analyzing political cartoons about high-profile troubled public sector projects in New Zealand and Denmark. Drawing on the theories of technological frames of reference, legitimacy, and stakeholder salience, we show how cartoonists expose and critique the normative framing of dysfunctionality to act as field-level evaluators of legitimacy. Through counter-framing, exaggeration, and metaphor, they emphasize the urgency of citizen users’ claims while undermining the legitimacy of powerful stakeholders. We extract lessons for stakeholder management and communication during project turnaround and suggest that satire could be a valuable addition to diagnostic and planning tools during de-escalation. We identify that sensitivity to framing of IT projects exists in the public realm, which reinforces calls for organizations to consider institutional framing.

KW - Cartoons

KW - De-escalation

KW - Escalation

KW - Political satire

KW - Technological frames of reference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052634673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17705/1CAIS.04307

DO - 10.17705/1CAIS.04307

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 133

EP - 158

JO - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

JF - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

SN - 1529-3181

IS - 1

M1 - 7

ER -