Abstract
Body-worn cameras (BWCs) have been promoted internationally to enhance responses to domestic and family violence (DFV). However, little is known about their utility, benefits, and limitations. Drawing upon the insights of DFV practitioners who support victim/survivors in the Australian states of Queensland and Western Australia, this article finds that while BWCs can capture some DFV incidents, they are unable to show their full context and impacts. BWC footage may also have consequences for “nonideal” victim/survivors, including wrongful criminalization and the removal of children. Ultimately, we argue that trauma-informed responses are vital for BWC use in DFV cases to improve frontline responses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Violence Against Women |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 14 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- body-worn camera technology
- domestic and family violence
- ideal victim
- misidentification
- police
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Police body-worn camera technology in response to domestic and family violence: a national study of victim-survivor perspectives and experiences
Iliadis, M. (Primary Chief Investigator (PCI)), Harris, B. (Chief Investigator (CI)), Tyson, D. (Chief Investigator (CI)), Flynn, A. (Chief Investigator (CI)) & Vakhitova, Z. (Chief Investigator (CI))
Monash University – Internal Department Contribution
10/08/21 → 31/12/22
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver