Police body-worn cameras as a response to domestic and family violence: practitioner insights into the consequences for victim/survivors

Mary Iliadis, Bridget Harris, Zarina Vakhitova, Asher Flynn, Danielle Tyson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Body-worn cameras (BWCs) have been promoted internationally to enhance responses to domestic and family violence (DFV). However, little is known about their utility, benefits, and limitations. Drawing upon the insights of DFV practitioners who support victim/survivors in the Australian states of Queensland and Western Australia, this article finds that while BWCs can capture some DFV incidents, they are unable to show their full context and impacts. BWC footage may also have consequences for “nonideal” victim/survivors, including wrongful criminalization and the removal of children. Ultimately, we argue that trauma-informed responses are vital for BWC use in DFV cases to improve frontline responses.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages22
JournalViolence Against Women
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2023

Keywords

  • body-worn camera technology
  • domestic and family violence
  • ideal victim
  • misidentification
  • police

Cite this