Plant–Human Commoning

Navigating Enclosure, Neoliberal Conservation, and Plant Mobility in Exurban Landscapes

Benjamin Cooke, Ruth Lane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conservation on private land in exurban landscapes is habitually framed around the private property parcel. Neoliberal conservation programs that position private property as exclusive territory for conservation action are compounding the property-centric focus of exurban conservation practices. This framing conflicts with an understanding of ecologies as socionatures that are geographically dispersed and temporally contingent, as well as the implications of landscape-scale species migration driven by climate change. Here we explore whether the agency and mobility of plants across property boundaries offer an avenue for more meaningful alternatives to exurban conservation that are not bounded by the territory of private property. The conservation practices of exurban landholders in Victoria, Australia, were explored through qualitative interviews and property walks. The mobility of plants in the form of spreading, seeding, and suckering through fence lines reflects a form of more-than-human territorial enactment that can bring attention to shared and relational ecologies, while unsettling the notion of control over conservation practice that accompanies property ownership. We explore the potential of the recent reengagement with commoning—in the form of plant–human commoning practices—to position plants as active collaborators in commoning, rather than as the objects of human commoning. Although attentive to the challenges of multispecies coalitions in conservation, we suggest that plant–human commoning could offer new possibilities for conservation that is grounded in the affordances of plants, as a counter to neoliberal governance and the individualization and privatization of exurban landscapes.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberAN-2017-0588.R2
Pages (from-to)1715-1731
Number of pages17
JournalAnnals of the American Association of Geographers
Volume108
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • more-than-human
  • commoning
  • mobility
  • private land
  • plants

Cite this

@article{cae2caa506c24f2892055c8ba67ea143,
title = "Plant–Human Commoning: Navigating Enclosure, Neoliberal Conservation, and Plant Mobility in Exurban Landscapes",
abstract = "Conservation on private land in exurban landscapes is habitually framed around the private property parcel. Neoliberal conservation programs that position private property as exclusive territory for conservation action are compounding the property-centric focus of exurban conservation practices. This framing conflicts with an understanding of ecologies as socionatures that are geographically dispersed and temporally contingent, as well as the implications of landscape-scale species migration driven by climate change. Here we explore whether the agency and mobility of plants across property boundaries offer an avenue for more meaningful alternatives to exurban conservation that are not bounded by the territory of private property. The conservation practices of exurban landholders in Victoria, Australia, were explored through qualitative interviews and property walks. The mobility of plants in the form of spreading, seeding, and suckering through fence lines reflects a form of more-than-human territorial enactment that can bring attention to shared and relational ecologies, while unsettling the notion of control over conservation practice that accompanies property ownership. We explore the potential of the recent reengagement with commoning—in the form of plant–human commoning practices—to position plants as active collaborators in commoning, rather than as the objects of human commoning. Although attentive to the challenges of multispecies coalitions in conservation, we suggest that plant–human commoning could offer new possibilities for conservation that is grounded in the affordances of plants, as a counter to neoliberal governance and the individualization and privatization of exurban landscapes.",
keywords = "more-than-human, commoning, mobility, private land, plants",
author = "Benjamin Cooke and Ruth Lane",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/24694452.2018.1453776",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "1715--1731",
journal = "Annals of the American Association of Geographers",
issn = "2469-4452",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

Plant–Human Commoning : Navigating Enclosure, Neoliberal Conservation, and Plant Mobility in Exurban Landscapes. / Cooke, Benjamin; Lane, Ruth.

In: Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Vol. 108, No. 6, AN-2017-0588.R2, 2018, p. 1715-1731.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plant–Human Commoning

T2 - Navigating Enclosure, Neoliberal Conservation, and Plant Mobility in Exurban Landscapes

AU - Cooke, Benjamin

AU - Lane, Ruth

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Conservation on private land in exurban landscapes is habitually framed around the private property parcel. Neoliberal conservation programs that position private property as exclusive territory for conservation action are compounding the property-centric focus of exurban conservation practices. This framing conflicts with an understanding of ecologies as socionatures that are geographically dispersed and temporally contingent, as well as the implications of landscape-scale species migration driven by climate change. Here we explore whether the agency and mobility of plants across property boundaries offer an avenue for more meaningful alternatives to exurban conservation that are not bounded by the territory of private property. The conservation practices of exurban landholders in Victoria, Australia, were explored through qualitative interviews and property walks. The mobility of plants in the form of spreading, seeding, and suckering through fence lines reflects a form of more-than-human territorial enactment that can bring attention to shared and relational ecologies, while unsettling the notion of control over conservation practice that accompanies property ownership. We explore the potential of the recent reengagement with commoning—in the form of plant–human commoning practices—to position plants as active collaborators in commoning, rather than as the objects of human commoning. Although attentive to the challenges of multispecies coalitions in conservation, we suggest that plant–human commoning could offer new possibilities for conservation that is grounded in the affordances of plants, as a counter to neoliberal governance and the individualization and privatization of exurban landscapes.

AB - Conservation on private land in exurban landscapes is habitually framed around the private property parcel. Neoliberal conservation programs that position private property as exclusive territory for conservation action are compounding the property-centric focus of exurban conservation practices. This framing conflicts with an understanding of ecologies as socionatures that are geographically dispersed and temporally contingent, as well as the implications of landscape-scale species migration driven by climate change. Here we explore whether the agency and mobility of plants across property boundaries offer an avenue for more meaningful alternatives to exurban conservation that are not bounded by the territory of private property. The conservation practices of exurban landholders in Victoria, Australia, were explored through qualitative interviews and property walks. The mobility of plants in the form of spreading, seeding, and suckering through fence lines reflects a form of more-than-human territorial enactment that can bring attention to shared and relational ecologies, while unsettling the notion of control over conservation practice that accompanies property ownership. We explore the potential of the recent reengagement with commoning—in the form of plant–human commoning practices—to position plants as active collaborators in commoning, rather than as the objects of human commoning. Although attentive to the challenges of multispecies coalitions in conservation, we suggest that plant–human commoning could offer new possibilities for conservation that is grounded in the affordances of plants, as a counter to neoliberal governance and the individualization and privatization of exurban landscapes.

KW - more-than-human

KW - commoning

KW - mobility

KW - private land

KW - plants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046638330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/24694452.2018.1453776

DO - 10.1080/24694452.2018.1453776

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 1715

EP - 1731

JO - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

JF - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

SN - 2469-4452

IS - 6

M1 - AN-2017-0588.R2

ER -