TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase 1 trial of olaparib and oral cyclophosphamide in BRCA breast cancer, recurrent BRCA ovarian cancer, non-BRCA triple-negative breast cancer, and non-BRCA ovarian cancer
AU - Lee, Chee Khoon
AU - Scott, Clare
AU - Lindeman, Geoffrey J.
AU - Hamilton, Anne
AU - Lieschke, Elizabeth
AU - Gibbs, Emma
AU - Asher, Rebecca
AU - Badger, Heath
AU - Paterson, Robin
AU - Macnab, Lauren
AU - Kwan, Edmond Michael
AU - Francis, Prudence A.
AU - Boyle, Frances
AU - Friedlander, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Cancer Research UK.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/2/5
Y1 - 2019/2/5
N2 - Background: We conducted a Phase 1 study to evaluate safety and activity of olaparib tablets and oral cyclophosphamide. Methods: Patients had metastatic breast cancer (BC) or recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), performance status 0–2, and ≤3 lines of prior therapy. Patients were treated using a dose escalation strategy with cohort expansion once maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. Dose level 1 (DL1): olaparib 300 mg bid, cyclophosphamide 50 mg on days 1, 3, and 5, weekly. DL2: olaparib 300 mg bid, cyclophosphamide 50 mg, days 1–5 weekly. Results: Of 32 patients, 23 had HGSOC (germline BRCA mutation [gBRCAm] 70%) and 9 had BC (gBRCAm 67%). Four were treated at DL1 and 28 at DL2, the MTD. Haematological adverse events (AEs) were most common: grade 3/4 AEs: lymphopenia 75%, anaemia 31%, neutropenia 37%, thrombocytopenia 47%. Two permanently discontinued treatment due to haematological AEs. In BC, no objective response was reported. Unconfirmed objective response was 48% and 64% for all HGSOC and gBRCAm subset, respectively. CA125 responses were 70% (all HGSOC) and 92% (gBRCAm). Conclusions: In HGSOC and BC, olaparib 300 mg bid and cyclophosphamide 50 mg on days 1–5 weekly were tolerable and active, particularly in gBRCAm, and is worthy of further investigation.
AB - Background: We conducted a Phase 1 study to evaluate safety and activity of olaparib tablets and oral cyclophosphamide. Methods: Patients had metastatic breast cancer (BC) or recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), performance status 0–2, and ≤3 lines of prior therapy. Patients were treated using a dose escalation strategy with cohort expansion once maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. Dose level 1 (DL1): olaparib 300 mg bid, cyclophosphamide 50 mg on days 1, 3, and 5, weekly. DL2: olaparib 300 mg bid, cyclophosphamide 50 mg, days 1–5 weekly. Results: Of 32 patients, 23 had HGSOC (germline BRCA mutation [gBRCAm] 70%) and 9 had BC (gBRCAm 67%). Four were treated at DL1 and 28 at DL2, the MTD. Haematological adverse events (AEs) were most common: grade 3/4 AEs: lymphopenia 75%, anaemia 31%, neutropenia 37%, thrombocytopenia 47%. Two permanently discontinued treatment due to haematological AEs. In BC, no objective response was reported. Unconfirmed objective response was 48% and 64% for all HGSOC and gBRCAm subset, respectively. CA125 responses were 70% (all HGSOC) and 92% (gBRCAm). Conclusions: In HGSOC and BC, olaparib 300 mg bid and cyclophosphamide 50 mg on days 1–5 weekly were tolerable and active, particularly in gBRCAm, and is worthy of further investigation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060192982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-018-0349-6
DO - 10.1038/s41416-018-0349-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 30655615
AN - SCOPUS:85060192982
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 120
SP - 279
EP - 285
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 3
ER -