Pharmacological analysis of the novel mode of interaction between xanomeline and the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

Arthur Christopoulos, Ann M. Parsons, Esam E. El-Fakahany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Previous findings in our laboratory suggested that the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist xanomeline exhibits a novel mode of interaction that involves persistent binding to and activation of the M1 mAChR, subsequent to extensive washout, as well as a possible insurmountable element. In the present study, we examined this interaction in greater detail, using Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the genes for the M1 mAChR and neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Pretreatment of cells with xanomeline, followed by extensive washout, resulted in elevated basal levels of neuronal nitric oxide synthase activity that were suppressed by the antagonists atropine or pirenzepine in a concentration-dependent manner. Analysis of the data yielded estimates of Schild slope factors and pK(B) values for the antagonists that were consistent with a model of simple competition between these latter agents and the persistently bound form of xanomeline. The ability of the antagonists to produce parallel dextral shifts of the concentration-response curves to carbachol and xanomeline was also investigated. The interaction between xanomeline and pirenzepine appeared to be insurmountable, but this may have been due to an equilibrium artifact. In contrast, the interaction between xanomeline and atropine conformed to a model of competition, indicating that the mode of interaction of free xanomeline at the M1 mAChR is pharmacologically identical with that of the persistently bound form. Radioligand binding studies also showed that the presence of various concentrations of xanomeline had no significant effect on the calculated affinity of atropine or pirenzepine in inhibiting the binding of [3H]N-methylscopolamine. Overall, these findings suggest that the persistent attachment of xanomeline to the M1 mAChR does not prevent this agonist from interacting with the classic binding site in a competitive fashion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1220-1228
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Volume289
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 1999
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{9476a613c8cb4436b2634ed4573d1bb5,
title = "Pharmacological analysis of the novel mode of interaction between xanomeline and the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor",
abstract = "Previous findings in our laboratory suggested that the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist xanomeline exhibits a novel mode of interaction that involves persistent binding to and activation of the M1 mAChR, subsequent to extensive washout, as well as a possible insurmountable element. In the present study, we examined this interaction in greater detail, using Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the genes for the M1 mAChR and neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Pretreatment of cells with xanomeline, followed by extensive washout, resulted in elevated basal levels of neuronal nitric oxide synthase activity that were suppressed by the antagonists atropine or pirenzepine in a concentration-dependent manner. Analysis of the data yielded estimates of Schild slope factors and pK(B) values for the antagonists that were consistent with a model of simple competition between these latter agents and the persistently bound form of xanomeline. The ability of the antagonists to produce parallel dextral shifts of the concentration-response curves to carbachol and xanomeline was also investigated. The interaction between xanomeline and pirenzepine appeared to be insurmountable, but this may have been due to an equilibrium artifact. In contrast, the interaction between xanomeline and atropine conformed to a model of competition, indicating that the mode of interaction of free xanomeline at the M1 mAChR is pharmacologically identical with that of the persistently bound form. Radioligand binding studies also showed that the presence of various concentrations of xanomeline had no significant effect on the calculated affinity of atropine or pirenzepine in inhibiting the binding of [3H]N-methylscopolamine. Overall, these findings suggest that the persistent attachment of xanomeline to the M1 mAChR does not prevent this agonist from interacting with the classic binding site in a competitive fashion.",
author = "Arthur Christopoulos and Parsons, {Ann M.} and El-Fakahany, {Esam E.}",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "289",
pages = "1220--1228",
journal = "Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics",
issn = "0022-3565",
publisher = "American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics",
number = "3",

}

Pharmacological analysis of the novel mode of interaction between xanomeline and the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. / Christopoulos, Arthur; Parsons, Ann M.; El-Fakahany, Esam E.

In: Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 289, No. 3, 01.06.1999, p. 1220-1228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pharmacological analysis of the novel mode of interaction between xanomeline and the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

AU - Christopoulos, Arthur

AU - Parsons, Ann M.

AU - El-Fakahany, Esam E.

PY - 1999/6/1

Y1 - 1999/6/1

N2 - Previous findings in our laboratory suggested that the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist xanomeline exhibits a novel mode of interaction that involves persistent binding to and activation of the M1 mAChR, subsequent to extensive washout, as well as a possible insurmountable element. In the present study, we examined this interaction in greater detail, using Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the genes for the M1 mAChR and neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Pretreatment of cells with xanomeline, followed by extensive washout, resulted in elevated basal levels of neuronal nitric oxide synthase activity that were suppressed by the antagonists atropine or pirenzepine in a concentration-dependent manner. Analysis of the data yielded estimates of Schild slope factors and pK(B) values for the antagonists that were consistent with a model of simple competition between these latter agents and the persistently bound form of xanomeline. The ability of the antagonists to produce parallel dextral shifts of the concentration-response curves to carbachol and xanomeline was also investigated. The interaction between xanomeline and pirenzepine appeared to be insurmountable, but this may have been due to an equilibrium artifact. In contrast, the interaction between xanomeline and atropine conformed to a model of competition, indicating that the mode of interaction of free xanomeline at the M1 mAChR is pharmacologically identical with that of the persistently bound form. Radioligand binding studies also showed that the presence of various concentrations of xanomeline had no significant effect on the calculated affinity of atropine or pirenzepine in inhibiting the binding of [3H]N-methylscopolamine. Overall, these findings suggest that the persistent attachment of xanomeline to the M1 mAChR does not prevent this agonist from interacting with the classic binding site in a competitive fashion.

AB - Previous findings in our laboratory suggested that the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist xanomeline exhibits a novel mode of interaction that involves persistent binding to and activation of the M1 mAChR, subsequent to extensive washout, as well as a possible insurmountable element. In the present study, we examined this interaction in greater detail, using Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the genes for the M1 mAChR and neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Pretreatment of cells with xanomeline, followed by extensive washout, resulted in elevated basal levels of neuronal nitric oxide synthase activity that were suppressed by the antagonists atropine or pirenzepine in a concentration-dependent manner. Analysis of the data yielded estimates of Schild slope factors and pK(B) values for the antagonists that were consistent with a model of simple competition between these latter agents and the persistently bound form of xanomeline. The ability of the antagonists to produce parallel dextral shifts of the concentration-response curves to carbachol and xanomeline was also investigated. The interaction between xanomeline and pirenzepine appeared to be insurmountable, but this may have been due to an equilibrium artifact. In contrast, the interaction between xanomeline and atropine conformed to a model of competition, indicating that the mode of interaction of free xanomeline at the M1 mAChR is pharmacologically identical with that of the persistently bound form. Radioligand binding studies also showed that the presence of various concentrations of xanomeline had no significant effect on the calculated affinity of atropine or pirenzepine in inhibiting the binding of [3H]N-methylscopolamine. Overall, these findings suggest that the persistent attachment of xanomeline to the M1 mAChR does not prevent this agonist from interacting with the classic binding site in a competitive fashion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033065382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 289

SP - 1220

EP - 1228

JO - Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

JF - Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

SN - 0022-3565

IS - 3

ER -