TY - JOUR
T1 - Perimeter control in a mixed bimodal bathtub model
AU - Dantsuji, Takao
AU - Takayama, Yuki
AU - Fukuda, Daisuke
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Se-il Mun, Eiji Hato, and Tsubasa Takeda for their valuable comments on the early version of this work. We are also grateful to the editor Robin Lindsey and anonymous referees for helpful comments. This work was supported by JST ACT-X, Japan (grant #JPMJAX21AE), by JST FOREST Program, Japan (grant #JPMJFR215M), by JSPS KAKENHI, Japan (grant #22H01610 and #23K13422), and by the Committee on Advanced Road Technology (CART), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, Japan (grant #2020-2).
Funding Information:
We thank Se-il Mun, Eiji Hato, and Tsubasa Takeda for their valuable comments on the early version of this work. We are also grateful to the editor Robin Lindsey and anonymous referees for helpful comments. This work was supported by JST ACT-X, Japan (grant #JPMJAX21AE ), by JST FOREST Program, Japan (grant #JPMJFR215M ), by JSPS KAKENHI, Japan (grant #22H01610 and #23K13422 ), and by the Committee on Advanced Road Technology (CART), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, Japan (grant #2020-2 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Perimeter control involves monitoring network-wide traffic and regulating traffic inflow to alleviate hypercongestion. Implementation of transit priority with perimeter control measures, which allow transit into a controlled area without queuing at the perimeter boundary, is an effective strategy in bimodal transportation systems. However, travelers’ behavior changes in response to perimeter control strategies, such as shifts in their departure times and transportation modes, have not been fully investigated. Therefore, important questions remain, such as the use of transit during perimeter control with transit priority. This paper examines the travelers’ behavior changes in response to perimeter control with transit priority in a mixed bimodal transportation system with cars and flexible route transit (FRT) vehicles. We model departure time and transportation mode choices in such a transportation system with hypercongestion and discomfort in FRT (called the mixed bimodal bathtub model). Initially, we investigate the properties of dynamic user equilibrium without perimeter control. Then, we study the equilibrium patterns during perimeter control with transit priority. Unlike existing works, we find that the number of FRT passengers decreases with time toward the desired arrival time and that FRT may not be used around the peak of rush hour. Furthermore, transit priority may not be sufficient to promote the use of FRT, and additional incentive such as subsidy for lower fares may be required to encourage FRT use during perimeter control. Finally, we show that operating many FRT vehicles does not always decrease the equilibrium cost, even under perimeter control with transit priority.
AB - Perimeter control involves monitoring network-wide traffic and regulating traffic inflow to alleviate hypercongestion. Implementation of transit priority with perimeter control measures, which allow transit into a controlled area without queuing at the perimeter boundary, is an effective strategy in bimodal transportation systems. However, travelers’ behavior changes in response to perimeter control strategies, such as shifts in their departure times and transportation modes, have not been fully investigated. Therefore, important questions remain, such as the use of transit during perimeter control with transit priority. This paper examines the travelers’ behavior changes in response to perimeter control with transit priority in a mixed bimodal transportation system with cars and flexible route transit (FRT) vehicles. We model departure time and transportation mode choices in such a transportation system with hypercongestion and discomfort in FRT (called the mixed bimodal bathtub model). Initially, we investigate the properties of dynamic user equilibrium without perimeter control. Then, we study the equilibrium patterns during perimeter control with transit priority. Unlike existing works, we find that the number of FRT passengers decreases with time toward the desired arrival time and that FRT may not be used around the peak of rush hour. Furthermore, transit priority may not be sufficient to promote the use of FRT, and additional incentive such as subsidy for lower fares may be required to encourage FRT use during perimeter control. Finally, we show that operating many FRT vehicles does not always decrease the equilibrium cost, even under perimeter control with transit priority.
KW - Bimodal bathtub model
KW - Car
KW - Discomfort
KW - Flexible route transit
KW - Hypercongestion
KW - Perimeter control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160419555&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.trb.2023.05.003
DO - 10.1016/j.trb.2023.05.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85160419555
SN - 0191-2615
VL - 173
SP - 267
EP - 291
JO - Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
JF - Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
ER -