Abstract
We explore performance persistence in mutual funds using absolute and relative benchmarks. Our sample, largely free of survivorship bias, indicates that relative risk‐adjusted performance of mutual funds persists; however, persistence is mostly due to funds that lag the S&P 500. A probit analysis indicates that poor performance increases the probability of disappearance. A year‐by‐year decomposition of the persistence effect demonstrates that the relative performance pattern depends upon the time period observed, and it is correlated across managers. Consequently, it is due to a common strategy that is not captured by standard stylistic categories or risk adjustment procedures. 1995 The American Finance Association
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 679-698 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Journal of Finance |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 1995 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver