Performance of the assessment of quality of life measure in people with hip and knee joint disease and implications for research and clinical use

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To comprehensively evaluate the performance of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in people with hip and knee joint disease (arthritis or osteoarthritis). Methods Data from 237 individuals were available for analysis from a national cross-sectional, population-based study of hip and knee joint disease in Australia. AQoL-4D data were evaluated using Rasch analysis. A range of measurement properties was explored, including model and item fit, threshold ordering, differential item functioning, and targeting. Results Good overall fit of the AQoL with the Rasch model was demonstrated across a range of tests, supporting internal validity. Only 1 item (relating to hearing) showed evidence of misfit. Most AQoL items showed logical sequencing of response option categories, with threshold disordering evident for only 2 of the 12 items (items 4 and 9). Minor issues with potential clinical and research implications include limited options for reporting pain and some evidence of measurement bias between demographic subgroups (including age and sex). Participants HRQOL was generally better than that represented by the AQoL items (mean ? SD for person abilities -2.15 ? 1.39, mean ? SD for item difficulties 0.00 ? 0.67), indicating ceiling effects that could impact the instrument s ability to detect HRQOL improvement in population-based studies. Conclusion The AQoL is a competent tool for assessing HRQOL in people with hip and knee joint disease, although researchers and clinicians should consider the caveats identified when selecting appropriate HRQOL measures for future outcome assessment involving this patient group.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)481 - 488
Number of pages8
JournalArthritis Care and Research
Volume66
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

@article{5b95456d9cf546eca0569b4ca4ca181d,
title = "Performance of the assessment of quality of life measure in people with hip and knee joint disease and implications for research and clinical use",
abstract = "Objective To comprehensively evaluate the performance of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in people with hip and knee joint disease (arthritis or osteoarthritis). Methods Data from 237 individuals were available for analysis from a national cross-sectional, population-based study of hip and knee joint disease in Australia. AQoL-4D data were evaluated using Rasch analysis. A range of measurement properties was explored, including model and item fit, threshold ordering, differential item functioning, and targeting. Results Good overall fit of the AQoL with the Rasch model was demonstrated across a range of tests, supporting internal validity. Only 1 item (relating to hearing) showed evidence of misfit. Most AQoL items showed logical sequencing of response option categories, with threshold disordering evident for only 2 of the 12 items (items 4 and 9). Minor issues with potential clinical and research implications include limited options for reporting pain and some evidence of measurement bias between demographic subgroups (including age and sex). Participants HRQOL was generally better than that represented by the AQoL items (mean ? SD for person abilities -2.15 ? 1.39, mean ? SD for item difficulties 0.00 ? 0.67), indicating ceiling effects that could impact the instrument s ability to detect HRQOL improvement in population-based studies. Conclusion The AQoL is a competent tool for assessing HRQOL in people with hip and knee joint disease, although researchers and clinicians should consider the caveats identified when selecting appropriate HRQOL measures for future outcome assessment involving this patient group.",
author = "Ackerman, {Ilana N} and Lucy Busija and Mark Tacey and Megan Bohensky and Zanfina Ademi and Brand, {Caroline Anne} and Danny Liew",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/acr.22129",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "481 -- 488",
journal = "Arthritis Care and Research",
issn = "2151-464X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of the assessment of quality of life measure in people with hip and knee joint disease and implications for research and clinical use

AU - Ackerman, Ilana N

AU - Busija, Lucy

AU - Tacey, Mark

AU - Bohensky, Megan

AU - Ademi, Zanfina

AU - Brand, Caroline Anne

AU - Liew, Danny

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective To comprehensively evaluate the performance of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in people with hip and knee joint disease (arthritis or osteoarthritis). Methods Data from 237 individuals were available for analysis from a national cross-sectional, population-based study of hip and knee joint disease in Australia. AQoL-4D data were evaluated using Rasch analysis. A range of measurement properties was explored, including model and item fit, threshold ordering, differential item functioning, and targeting. Results Good overall fit of the AQoL with the Rasch model was demonstrated across a range of tests, supporting internal validity. Only 1 item (relating to hearing) showed evidence of misfit. Most AQoL items showed logical sequencing of response option categories, with threshold disordering evident for only 2 of the 12 items (items 4 and 9). Minor issues with potential clinical and research implications include limited options for reporting pain and some evidence of measurement bias between demographic subgroups (including age and sex). Participants HRQOL was generally better than that represented by the AQoL items (mean ? SD for person abilities -2.15 ? 1.39, mean ? SD for item difficulties 0.00 ? 0.67), indicating ceiling effects that could impact the instrument s ability to detect HRQOL improvement in population-based studies. Conclusion The AQoL is a competent tool for assessing HRQOL in people with hip and knee joint disease, although researchers and clinicians should consider the caveats identified when selecting appropriate HRQOL measures for future outcome assessment involving this patient group.

AB - Objective To comprehensively evaluate the performance of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in people with hip and knee joint disease (arthritis or osteoarthritis). Methods Data from 237 individuals were available for analysis from a national cross-sectional, population-based study of hip and knee joint disease in Australia. AQoL-4D data were evaluated using Rasch analysis. A range of measurement properties was explored, including model and item fit, threshold ordering, differential item functioning, and targeting. Results Good overall fit of the AQoL with the Rasch model was demonstrated across a range of tests, supporting internal validity. Only 1 item (relating to hearing) showed evidence of misfit. Most AQoL items showed logical sequencing of response option categories, with threshold disordering evident for only 2 of the 12 items (items 4 and 9). Minor issues with potential clinical and research implications include limited options for reporting pain and some evidence of measurement bias between demographic subgroups (including age and sex). Participants HRQOL was generally better than that represented by the AQoL items (mean ? SD for person abilities -2.15 ? 1.39, mean ? SD for item difficulties 0.00 ? 0.67), indicating ceiling effects that could impact the instrument s ability to detect HRQOL improvement in population-based studies. Conclusion The AQoL is a competent tool for assessing HRQOL in people with hip and knee joint disease, although researchers and clinicians should consider the caveats identified when selecting appropriate HRQOL measures for future outcome assessment involving this patient group.

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.22129/epdf

U2 - 10.1002/acr.22129

DO - 10.1002/acr.22129

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 481

EP - 488

JO - Arthritis Care and Research

JF - Arthritis Care and Research

SN - 2151-464X

IS - 3

ER -