TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of hybrid GFRP–CFRP tubes as UV-exposed structural components
T2 - influence of layer configuration
AU - Thapa, Sunil
AU - Bazli, Milad
AU - Shahbazi, Ramin
AU - Paudel, Samip
AU - Jacob, Job
AU - Shakiba, Milad
AU - Rajabipour, Ali
AU - Hassanli, Reza
AU - Arashpour, Mehrdad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Fibre hybridisation offers a pathway to reduce the high cost of carbon fibres while improving the limited durability of glass fibres. This study provides the first systematic investigation into how layer configuration governs UV-induced degradation and residual compressive performance of filament-wound hybrid glass/carbon fibre reinforced polymer (HFRP) tubes. Four configurations were fabricated: two with 50 % GFRP and 50 % CFRP in inner–outer placements, and two with alternating sequences. Specimens were subjected to accelerated UV exposure for 720, 1440, and 2160 h, simulating up to 3 years in Melbourne, Australia. Residual properties were evaluated using compression tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Results show that alternating configurations exhibited only 15–17 % strength reduction after 2160 h, while 50–50 % tubes with CFRP outer layers retained about 82 % of their strength compared with up to 30 % loss when GFRP was exposed. Elastic modulus decreased less significantly, with maximum reductions of 12 %. Two-way ANOVA confirmed that exposure duration was the dominant factor (ηp² = 0.801, large effect), while layer configuration also had a meaningful impact (ηp² = 0.582, large effect). SEM and FTIR analyses confirmed that CFRP layers mitigated resin oxidation and microcracking, whereas GFRP outer layers accelerated interfacial degradation. These findings highlight that UV degradation is governed not only by the exposed fibre type but also by the internal stacking sequence. Alternating configurations effectively distribute damage and reduce reliance on the outermost ply, while CFRP outer layers significantly enhance durability.
AB - Fibre hybridisation offers a pathway to reduce the high cost of carbon fibres while improving the limited durability of glass fibres. This study provides the first systematic investigation into how layer configuration governs UV-induced degradation and residual compressive performance of filament-wound hybrid glass/carbon fibre reinforced polymer (HFRP) tubes. Four configurations were fabricated: two with 50 % GFRP and 50 % CFRP in inner–outer placements, and two with alternating sequences. Specimens were subjected to accelerated UV exposure for 720, 1440, and 2160 h, simulating up to 3 years in Melbourne, Australia. Residual properties were evaluated using compression tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Results show that alternating configurations exhibited only 15–17 % strength reduction after 2160 h, while 50–50 % tubes with CFRP outer layers retained about 82 % of their strength compared with up to 30 % loss when GFRP was exposed. Elastic modulus decreased less significantly, with maximum reductions of 12 %. Two-way ANOVA confirmed that exposure duration was the dominant factor (ηp² = 0.801, large effect), while layer configuration also had a meaningful impact (ηp² = 0.582, large effect). SEM and FTIR analyses confirmed that CFRP layers mitigated resin oxidation and microcracking, whereas GFRP outer layers accelerated interfacial degradation. These findings highlight that UV degradation is governed not only by the exposed fibre type but also by the internal stacking sequence. Alternating configurations effectively distribute damage and reduce reliance on the outermost ply, while CFRP outer layers significantly enhance durability.
KW - Carbon fibre
KW - Compressive strength
KW - Environmental ageing
KW - Fibre-reinforced composites
KW - Glass fibre
KW - Long-term durability
KW - Photodegradation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019924825
U2 - 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107658
DO - 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107658
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105019924825
SN - 2590-1230
VL - 28
JO - Results in Engineering
JF - Results in Engineering
M1 - 107658
ER -