Abstract
Software engineering, especially design and requirements engineering, is intensely creative. However, practitioners and researchers appear to perceive creativity differently, hindering knowledge transfer. To explore and understand these perceptual differences, this paper combines a systematic mapping study of SE research literature with an interview study of practitioners. The subsequent analysis of 84 primary studies and 17 semi-structured interviews reveal some agreement (e.g. creativity is a process that produces novel and useful ideas). However, it also reveals important differences in the way creativity is conceptualized, measured and improved. These differences undermine evidence-based techniques to enhance and measure creativity in SE research and practice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings - 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2017 |
Subtitle of host publication | 30 August – 1 September 2017 Vienna, Austria |
Editors | Michael Felderer, Helena Holmström Olsson, Amund Skavhaug |
Place of Publication | Piscataway NJ USA |
Publisher | IEEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
Pages | 210-217 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781538621400, 9781538621417 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781538621424 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications 2017 - Vienna, Austria Duration: 30 Aug 2017 → 1 Sept 2017 Conference number: 43rd https://dsd-seaa2017.ocg.at//seaa2017.html https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/8051031/proceeding (Proceedings) |
Conference
Conference | Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications 2017 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | SEAA 2017 |
Country/Territory | Austria |
City | Vienna |
Period | 30/08/17 → 1/09/17 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Creativity
- Interviews
- Software engineering
- Systematic mapping