Perceived Family Functioning Predicts Baseline Psychosocial Characteristics in U.S. Participants of a Family Focused Grief Therapy Trial

Tammy A Schuler, Talia I Zaider, Yuelin Li, Melissa P Masterson, Glynnis A. McDonnell, Shira Hichenberg, Rebecca Loeb, David W. Kissane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Context and Objectives Screening and baseline data on 170 American families (620 individuals), selected by screening from a palliative care population for inclusion in a randomized controlled trial of family-focused grief therapy, were examined to determine whether family dysfunction conferred higher levels of psychosocial morbidity. We hypothesized that greater family dysfunction would, indeed, be associated with poorer psychosocial outcomes among palliative care patients and their family members. Methods Screened families were classified according to their functioning on the Family Relationships Index (FRI) and consented families completed baseline assessments. Mixed-effects modeling with post hoc tests compared individuals' baseline psychosocial outcomes (psychological distress, social functioning, and family functioning on a different measure) according to the classification of their family on the FRI. Covariates were included in all models as appropriate. Results For those who completed baseline measures, 191 (30.0%) individuals were in low-communicating families, 313 (50.5%) in uninvolved families, and 116 (18.7%) in conflictual families. Family class was significantly associated (at ps ≤ 0.05) with increased psychological distress (Beck Depression Inventory and Brief Symptom Inventory) and poorer social adjustment (Social Adjustment Scale) for individual family members. The family assessment device supported the concurrent accuracy of the FRI. Conclusion As predicted, significantly greater levels of individual psychosocial morbidity were present in American families whose functioning as a group was poorer. Support was generated for a clinical approach that screens families to identify those at high risk. Overall, these baseline data point to the importance of a family-centered model of care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-131
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Keywords

  • family functioning
  • Family-centered care
  • palliative care
  • psycho-oncology
  • psychological
  • RCT

Cite this

Schuler, Tammy A ; Zaider, Talia I ; Li, Yuelin ; Masterson, Melissa P ; McDonnell, Glynnis A. ; Hichenberg, Shira ; Loeb, Rebecca ; Kissane, David W. / Perceived Family Functioning Predicts Baseline Psychosocial Characteristics in U.S. Participants of a Family Focused Grief Therapy Trial. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2017 ; Vol. 54, No. 1. pp. 126-131.
@article{7b6feafab3e4405fb115ad65aeb6b43a,
title = "Perceived Family Functioning Predicts Baseline Psychosocial Characteristics in U.S. Participants of a Family Focused Grief Therapy Trial",
abstract = "Context and Objectives Screening and baseline data on 170 American families (620 individuals), selected by screening from a palliative care population for inclusion in a randomized controlled trial of family-focused grief therapy, were examined to determine whether family dysfunction conferred higher levels of psychosocial morbidity. We hypothesized that greater family dysfunction would, indeed, be associated with poorer psychosocial outcomes among palliative care patients and their family members. Methods Screened families were classified according to their functioning on the Family Relationships Index (FRI) and consented families completed baseline assessments. Mixed-effects modeling with post hoc tests compared individuals' baseline psychosocial outcomes (psychological distress, social functioning, and family functioning on a different measure) according to the classification of their family on the FRI. Covariates were included in all models as appropriate. Results For those who completed baseline measures, 191 (30.0{\%}) individuals were in low-communicating families, 313 (50.5{\%}) in uninvolved families, and 116 (18.7{\%}) in conflictual families. Family class was significantly associated (at ps ≤ 0.05) with increased psychological distress (Beck Depression Inventory and Brief Symptom Inventory) and poorer social adjustment (Social Adjustment Scale) for individual family members. The family assessment device supported the concurrent accuracy of the FRI. Conclusion As predicted, significantly greater levels of individual psychosocial morbidity were present in American families whose functioning as a group was poorer. Support was generated for a clinical approach that screens families to identify those at high risk. Overall, these baseline data point to the importance of a family-centered model of care.",
keywords = "family functioning, Family-centered care, palliative care, psycho-oncology, psychological, RCT",
author = "Schuler, {Tammy A} and Zaider, {Talia I} and Yuelin Li and Masterson, {Melissa P} and McDonnell, {Glynnis A.} and Shira Hichenberg and Rebecca Loeb and Kissane, {David W.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.016",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "126--131",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Perceived Family Functioning Predicts Baseline Psychosocial Characteristics in U.S. Participants of a Family Focused Grief Therapy Trial. / Schuler, Tammy A; Zaider, Talia I; Li, Yuelin; Masterson, Melissa P; McDonnell, Glynnis A.; Hichenberg, Shira; Loeb, Rebecca; Kissane, David W.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 54, No. 1, 01.07.2017, p. 126-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived Family Functioning Predicts Baseline Psychosocial Characteristics in U.S. Participants of a Family Focused Grief Therapy Trial

AU - Schuler, Tammy A

AU - Zaider, Talia I

AU - Li, Yuelin

AU - Masterson, Melissa P

AU - McDonnell, Glynnis A.

AU - Hichenberg, Shira

AU - Loeb, Rebecca

AU - Kissane, David W.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Context and Objectives Screening and baseline data on 170 American families (620 individuals), selected by screening from a palliative care population for inclusion in a randomized controlled trial of family-focused grief therapy, were examined to determine whether family dysfunction conferred higher levels of psychosocial morbidity. We hypothesized that greater family dysfunction would, indeed, be associated with poorer psychosocial outcomes among palliative care patients and their family members. Methods Screened families were classified according to their functioning on the Family Relationships Index (FRI) and consented families completed baseline assessments. Mixed-effects modeling with post hoc tests compared individuals' baseline psychosocial outcomes (psychological distress, social functioning, and family functioning on a different measure) according to the classification of their family on the FRI. Covariates were included in all models as appropriate. Results For those who completed baseline measures, 191 (30.0%) individuals were in low-communicating families, 313 (50.5%) in uninvolved families, and 116 (18.7%) in conflictual families. Family class was significantly associated (at ps ≤ 0.05) with increased psychological distress (Beck Depression Inventory and Brief Symptom Inventory) and poorer social adjustment (Social Adjustment Scale) for individual family members. The family assessment device supported the concurrent accuracy of the FRI. Conclusion As predicted, significantly greater levels of individual psychosocial morbidity were present in American families whose functioning as a group was poorer. Support was generated for a clinical approach that screens families to identify those at high risk. Overall, these baseline data point to the importance of a family-centered model of care.

AB - Context and Objectives Screening and baseline data on 170 American families (620 individuals), selected by screening from a palliative care population for inclusion in a randomized controlled trial of family-focused grief therapy, were examined to determine whether family dysfunction conferred higher levels of psychosocial morbidity. We hypothesized that greater family dysfunction would, indeed, be associated with poorer psychosocial outcomes among palliative care patients and their family members. Methods Screened families were classified according to their functioning on the Family Relationships Index (FRI) and consented families completed baseline assessments. Mixed-effects modeling with post hoc tests compared individuals' baseline psychosocial outcomes (psychological distress, social functioning, and family functioning on a different measure) according to the classification of their family on the FRI. Covariates were included in all models as appropriate. Results For those who completed baseline measures, 191 (30.0%) individuals were in low-communicating families, 313 (50.5%) in uninvolved families, and 116 (18.7%) in conflictual families. Family class was significantly associated (at ps ≤ 0.05) with increased psychological distress (Beck Depression Inventory and Brief Symptom Inventory) and poorer social adjustment (Social Adjustment Scale) for individual family members. The family assessment device supported the concurrent accuracy of the FRI. Conclusion As predicted, significantly greater levels of individual psychosocial morbidity were present in American families whose functioning as a group was poorer. Support was generated for a clinical approach that screens families to identify those at high risk. Overall, these baseline data point to the importance of a family-centered model of care.

KW - family functioning

KW - Family-centered care

KW - palliative care

KW - psycho-oncology

KW - psychological

KW - RCT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022038963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.016

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 126

EP - 131

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 1

ER -