TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceived family cohesion, social support, and quality of life in patients undergoing treatment for substance use disorders compared with patients with mental and physical disorders
AU - Birkeland, Bente
AU - Weimand, Bente
AU - Ruud, Torleif
AU - Maybery, Darryl
AU - Vederhus, John Kåre
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the participating hospitals; S?rlandet Hospital, Akershus University Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital, Helse Stavanger University Hospital, Nordland Hospital, and Rogaland A-senter. We would also like to thank the Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, for technical support in the collection of data, and the BarnsBeste (Children?s Best Interest) network for contributing user perspective to this study.
Funding Information:
The study was funded by the Norwegian Research Council (No. 213477), the Addiction Unit and “Barns Beste” (Children’s Best Interest) at Sørlandet Hospital and the participating partners in the study, with additional funding from the Norwegian Directorate of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/6/30
Y1 - 2021/6/30
N2 - Purpose: Support from family and other social network elements can be important in helping patients to cope with practical and emotional consequences of diseases. The aim of the study was to examine perception of family and social support and quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). We compared them with patients in treatment for mental disorders (MDs) and physical disorders (PDs). Methods: We used data from a national multicenter study that recruited patients (N = 518) from three treatment domains; SUD treatment units, MD treatment units, and PD treatment units (severe neurological conditions or cancer). Data on family cohesion, social support, and QoL were compared across patient groups. In addition, data on health variables was collected. We used a multiple linear regression procedure to examine how health and support variables were associated with QoL. Results: Family cohesion and social support in the SUD and MD groups were rated at similarly low levels, substantially lower than in the PD group. The SUD group exhibited a somewhat lower QoL than did the PD group, but their QoL was still in the near-to-normal range. In contrast, the MD group had markedly low QoL. When examining factors associated with QoL, we found that greater family cohesion and social support were positively associated with QoL. Mental distress was the strongest factor, and was negatively associated with QoL (beta − 0.15, 95% CI = − 0.17/− 0.14, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Service providers need to be aware of the weaker networks and less regulatory family and/or social support available to patients with SUDs. Providers should focus consistently on the social networks of patients and include patients’ families in treatment processes.
AB - Purpose: Support from family and other social network elements can be important in helping patients to cope with practical and emotional consequences of diseases. The aim of the study was to examine perception of family and social support and quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). We compared them with patients in treatment for mental disorders (MDs) and physical disorders (PDs). Methods: We used data from a national multicenter study that recruited patients (N = 518) from three treatment domains; SUD treatment units, MD treatment units, and PD treatment units (severe neurological conditions or cancer). Data on family cohesion, social support, and QoL were compared across patient groups. In addition, data on health variables was collected. We used a multiple linear regression procedure to examine how health and support variables were associated with QoL. Results: Family cohesion and social support in the SUD and MD groups were rated at similarly low levels, substantially lower than in the PD group. The SUD group exhibited a somewhat lower QoL than did the PD group, but their QoL was still in the near-to-normal range. In contrast, the MD group had markedly low QoL. When examining factors associated with QoL, we found that greater family cohesion and social support were positively associated with QoL. Mental distress was the strongest factor, and was negatively associated with QoL (beta − 0.15, 95% CI = − 0.17/− 0.14, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Service providers need to be aware of the weaker networks and less regulatory family and/or social support available to patients with SUDs. Providers should focus consistently on the social networks of patients and include patients’ families in treatment processes.
KW - Family cohesion
KW - Norway
KW - Quality of life
KW - Social support
KW - Substance use disorders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108993754&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13722-021-00252-8
DO - 10.1186/s13722-021-00252-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 34193283
AN - SCOPUS:85108993754
SN - 1940-0632
VL - 16
JO - Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
JF - Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
IS - 1
M1 - 44
ER -