Penal power and border control: Which thesis? Sovereignty, governmentality, or the pre-emptive state?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides a critical review of key theoretical positions relevant to border control and sets out an agenda for developing these ideas. In 2005 Mythen and Walklate published a theoretical milestone for the study of terrorism in their article ‘Criminology and terrorism: Which thesis? Risk society or governmentality?’. Those authors reviewed two theories of risk, considering how each might contribute to understanding ‘new terrorism’. Inspired by ‘Which thesis?’ we review, contrast and compare three key theoretical contributions relevant to penology, criminology and border control: Stump’s ‘crimmigration’ thesis, Bosworth and Guild’s adaptation of the ‘new penology’ perspective, and Krasmann’s critique of Jakobs’ ‘enemy penology’ thesis. The article consolidates these important theoretical strands into one critical discussion, highlighting the growing relevance of the pre-crime literature to the study of borders, and signposting potential theoretical developments within border criminology that build on these foundations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)496-514
Number of pages19
JournalPunishment and Society
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • border control
  • border criminology
  • crimmigration
  • enemy penology
  • new penology
  • pre-emption

Cite this

@article{f05e8521db27483783ec8bf0f48093c8,
title = "Penal power and border control: Which thesis? Sovereignty, governmentality, or the pre-emptive state?",
abstract = "This article provides a critical review of key theoretical positions relevant to border control and sets out an agenda for developing these ideas. In 2005 Mythen and Walklate published a theoretical milestone for the study of terrorism in their article ‘Criminology and terrorism: Which thesis? Risk society or governmentality?’. Those authors reviewed two theories of risk, considering how each might contribute to understanding ‘new terrorism’. Inspired by ‘Which thesis?’ we review, contrast and compare three key theoretical contributions relevant to penology, criminology and border control: Stump’s ‘crimmigration’ thesis, Bosworth and Guild’s adaptation of the ‘new penology’ perspective, and Krasmann’s critique of Jakobs’ ‘enemy penology’ thesis. The article consolidates these important theoretical strands into one critical discussion, highlighting the growing relevance of the pre-crime literature to the study of borders, and signposting potential theoretical developments within border criminology that build on these foundations.",
keywords = "border control, border criminology, crimmigration, enemy penology, new penology, pre-emption",
author = "Leanne Weber and Jude McCulloch",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/1462474518797293",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "496--514",
journal = "Punishment and Society",
issn = "1462-4745",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Penal power and border control : Which thesis? Sovereignty, governmentality, or the pre-emptive state? / Weber, Leanne; McCulloch, Jude.

In: Punishment and Society, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2019, p. 496-514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Penal power and border control

T2 - Which thesis? Sovereignty, governmentality, or the pre-emptive state?

AU - Weber, Leanne

AU - McCulloch, Jude

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article provides a critical review of key theoretical positions relevant to border control and sets out an agenda for developing these ideas. In 2005 Mythen and Walklate published a theoretical milestone for the study of terrorism in their article ‘Criminology and terrorism: Which thesis? Risk society or governmentality?’. Those authors reviewed two theories of risk, considering how each might contribute to understanding ‘new terrorism’. Inspired by ‘Which thesis?’ we review, contrast and compare three key theoretical contributions relevant to penology, criminology and border control: Stump’s ‘crimmigration’ thesis, Bosworth and Guild’s adaptation of the ‘new penology’ perspective, and Krasmann’s critique of Jakobs’ ‘enemy penology’ thesis. The article consolidates these important theoretical strands into one critical discussion, highlighting the growing relevance of the pre-crime literature to the study of borders, and signposting potential theoretical developments within border criminology that build on these foundations.

AB - This article provides a critical review of key theoretical positions relevant to border control and sets out an agenda for developing these ideas. In 2005 Mythen and Walklate published a theoretical milestone for the study of terrorism in their article ‘Criminology and terrorism: Which thesis? Risk society or governmentality?’. Those authors reviewed two theories of risk, considering how each might contribute to understanding ‘new terrorism’. Inspired by ‘Which thesis?’ we review, contrast and compare three key theoretical contributions relevant to penology, criminology and border control: Stump’s ‘crimmigration’ thesis, Bosworth and Guild’s adaptation of the ‘new penology’ perspective, and Krasmann’s critique of Jakobs’ ‘enemy penology’ thesis. The article consolidates these important theoretical strands into one critical discussion, highlighting the growing relevance of the pre-crime literature to the study of borders, and signposting potential theoretical developments within border criminology that build on these foundations.

KW - border control

KW - border criminology

KW - crimmigration

KW - enemy penology

KW - new penology

KW - pre-emption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058667810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1462474518797293

DO - 10.1177/1462474518797293

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058667810

VL - 21

SP - 496

EP - 514

JO - Punishment and Society

JF - Punishment and Society

SN - 1462-4745

IS - 4

ER -