Penal humanitarianism? Sovereign power in an era of mass migration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Since creating the 'Returns and Reintegration Fund' in 2008, the British
government has financed a variety of initiatives around the world under the
rubric of "managing migration" which have blurred the boundaries between
migration control and punishment. This article documents and explores a series
of overlapping case studies undertaken in Nigeria and Jamaica where the UK
funded prison building programs, mandatory prisoner transfer agreements,
prison training programs and resettlement assistance for deportees. These
initiatives demonstrate in quite concrete ways a series of interconnections
between criminal justice and migration control that are both novel and, in their
postcolonial location, familiar. In their ties to international development and
foreign policy they also illuminate how humanitarianism allows penal power to
move beyond the nation state. In so doing, these overseas programs raise
important questions about our understanding of punishment and its application.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-65
Number of pages27
JournalNew Criminal Law Review: an international and interdisciplinary journal
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Punishment
  • mass migration
  • sovereignty
  • Jamaica
  • Nigeria
  • penal humanitarianism
  • colonialism

Cite this

@article{b9960f870c5b431899851879ed03246d,
title = "Penal humanitarianism?: Sovereign power in an era of mass migration",
abstract = "Since creating the 'Returns and Reintegration Fund' in 2008, the Britishgovernment has financed a variety of initiatives around the world under therubric of {"}managing migration{"} which have blurred the boundaries betweenmigration control and punishment. This article documents and explores a seriesof overlapping case studies undertaken in Nigeria and Jamaica where the UKfunded prison building programs, mandatory prisoner transfer agreements,prison training programs and resettlement assistance for deportees. Theseinitiatives demonstrate in quite concrete ways a series of interconnectionsbetween criminal justice and migration control that are both novel and, in theirpostcolonial location, familiar. In their ties to international development andforeign policy they also illuminate how humanitarianism allows penal power tomove beyond the nation state. In so doing, these overseas programs raiseimportant questions about our understanding of punishment and its application.",
keywords = "Punishment, mass migration, sovereignty, Jamaica, Nigeria, penal humanitarianism, colonialism",
author = "Mary Bosworth",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1525/nclr.2017.20.1.39.",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "39--65",
journal = "New Criminal Law Review: an international and interdisciplinary journal",
issn = "1933-4192",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "1",

}

Penal humanitarianism? Sovereign power in an era of mass migration. / Bosworth, Mary.

In: New Criminal Law Review: an international and interdisciplinary journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2017, p. 39-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Penal humanitarianism?

T2 - Sovereign power in an era of mass migration

AU - Bosworth, Mary

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Since creating the 'Returns and Reintegration Fund' in 2008, the Britishgovernment has financed a variety of initiatives around the world under therubric of "managing migration" which have blurred the boundaries betweenmigration control and punishment. This article documents and explores a seriesof overlapping case studies undertaken in Nigeria and Jamaica where the UKfunded prison building programs, mandatory prisoner transfer agreements,prison training programs and resettlement assistance for deportees. Theseinitiatives demonstrate in quite concrete ways a series of interconnectionsbetween criminal justice and migration control that are both novel and, in theirpostcolonial location, familiar. In their ties to international development andforeign policy they also illuminate how humanitarianism allows penal power tomove beyond the nation state. In so doing, these overseas programs raiseimportant questions about our understanding of punishment and its application.

AB - Since creating the 'Returns and Reintegration Fund' in 2008, the Britishgovernment has financed a variety of initiatives around the world under therubric of "managing migration" which have blurred the boundaries betweenmigration control and punishment. This article documents and explores a seriesof overlapping case studies undertaken in Nigeria and Jamaica where the UKfunded prison building programs, mandatory prisoner transfer agreements,prison training programs and resettlement assistance for deportees. Theseinitiatives demonstrate in quite concrete ways a series of interconnectionsbetween criminal justice and migration control that are both novel and, in theirpostcolonial location, familiar. In their ties to international development andforeign policy they also illuminate how humanitarianism allows penal power tomove beyond the nation state. In so doing, these overseas programs raiseimportant questions about our understanding of punishment and its application.

KW - Punishment

KW - mass migration

KW - sovereignty

KW - Jamaica

KW - Nigeria

KW - penal humanitarianism

KW - colonialism

U2 - 10.1525/nclr.2017.20.1.39.

DO - 10.1525/nclr.2017.20.1.39.

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 39

EP - 65

JO - New Criminal Law Review: an international and interdisciplinary journal

JF - New Criminal Law Review: an international and interdisciplinary journal

SN - 1933-4192

IS - 1

ER -