Pedestrian smartphone distraction

prevalence and potential severity

Timothy Horberry, Rachel Osborne, Kristie Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

To better understand the incidence and potential severity of pedestrian smartphone distraction in a city location, a non-invasive observational study was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Video recordings of pedestrians crossing roads at eight city sites were undertaken during daytime conditions. Data were analysed both for pedestrian use of different smartphone functions such as hand-held calls, and for ‘critical events’ such as crossing the road at a prohibited time. The results found that, on average, 20% of pedestrians were using their smartphones when crossing roads, significantly more critical events occurred with smartphone users compared to non-smartphone users, and that the pattern of critical events was different for smartphone and non-smartphone users. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of further research and potential countermeasures to minimise the occurrence, or impact, of pedestrian distraction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)515-523
Number of pages9
JournalTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Volume60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Distraction
  • Mobile phones
  • Observations
  • Pedestrians
  • Smartphones

Cite this

@article{7e38cd38160642b6997e03be579a5d8e,
title = "Pedestrian smartphone distraction: prevalence and potential severity",
abstract = "To better understand the incidence and potential severity of pedestrian smartphone distraction in a city location, a non-invasive observational study was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Video recordings of pedestrians crossing roads at eight city sites were undertaken during daytime conditions. Data were analysed both for pedestrian use of different smartphone functions such as hand-held calls, and for ‘critical events’ such as crossing the road at a prohibited time. The results found that, on average, 20{\%} of pedestrians were using their smartphones when crossing roads, significantly more critical events occurred with smartphone users compared to non-smartphone users, and that the pattern of critical events was different for smartphone and non-smartphone users. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of further research and potential countermeasures to minimise the occurrence, or impact, of pedestrian distraction.",
keywords = "Distraction, Mobile phones, Observations, Pedestrians, Smartphones",
author = "Timothy Horberry and Rachel Osborne and Kristie Young",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.011",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "515--523",
journal = "Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour",
issn = "1369-8478",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Pedestrian smartphone distraction : prevalence and potential severity. / Horberry, Timothy; Osborne, Rachel; Young, Kristie.

In: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 60, 2019, p. 515-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pedestrian smartphone distraction

T2 - prevalence and potential severity

AU - Horberry, Timothy

AU - Osborne, Rachel

AU - Young, Kristie

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - To better understand the incidence and potential severity of pedestrian smartphone distraction in a city location, a non-invasive observational study was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Video recordings of pedestrians crossing roads at eight city sites were undertaken during daytime conditions. Data were analysed both for pedestrian use of different smartphone functions such as hand-held calls, and for ‘critical events’ such as crossing the road at a prohibited time. The results found that, on average, 20% of pedestrians were using their smartphones when crossing roads, significantly more critical events occurred with smartphone users compared to non-smartphone users, and that the pattern of critical events was different for smartphone and non-smartphone users. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of further research and potential countermeasures to minimise the occurrence, or impact, of pedestrian distraction.

AB - To better understand the incidence and potential severity of pedestrian smartphone distraction in a city location, a non-invasive observational study was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Video recordings of pedestrians crossing roads at eight city sites were undertaken during daytime conditions. Data were analysed both for pedestrian use of different smartphone functions such as hand-held calls, and for ‘critical events’ such as crossing the road at a prohibited time. The results found that, on average, 20% of pedestrians were using their smartphones when crossing roads, significantly more critical events occurred with smartphone users compared to non-smartphone users, and that the pattern of critical events was different for smartphone and non-smartphone users. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of further research and potential countermeasures to minimise the occurrence, or impact, of pedestrian distraction.

KW - Distraction

KW - Mobile phones

KW - Observations

KW - Pedestrians

KW - Smartphones

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057521258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.011

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 515

EP - 523

JO - Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

JF - Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

SN - 1369-8478

ER -