TY - JOUR
T1 - Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of self-management support interactions
T2 - Systematic review and qualitative synthesis
AU - Franklin, Marika
AU - Lewis, Sophie
AU - Willis, Karen
AU - Bourke-Taylor, Helen
AU - Smith, Lorraine
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by the Australian Research Council (DP150101406).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/6/1
Y1 - 2018/6/1
N2 - Objective: To review studies examining the experience of self-management support in patient–provider interactions and the shaping of goals through interactions. Methods: We undertook a systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature. We searched six databases (2004–2015) for published studies on the provision of self-management support in one-to-one, face-to-face, patient–provider interactions for obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with 14 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Results: Themes identified from studies were (1) dominance of a traditional model of care, encompassing the provision of generic information, exclusion of the psychosocial and temporal nature of interactions and (2) a context of individual responsibility and accountability, encompassing self-management as patients’ responsibility and adherence, accountability and the attribution of blame. Interactions were constrained by consultation times, patient self-blame and guilt, desire for autonomy and beliefs about what constitutes ‘effective’ self-management. Discussion: Encounters were oriented towards a traditional model of care delivery and this limited opportunity for collaboration. These findings suggest that healthcare professionals remain in a position of authority, limiting opportunities for control to be shared with patients and shared understandings of social context to be developed.
AB - Objective: To review studies examining the experience of self-management support in patient–provider interactions and the shaping of goals through interactions. Methods: We undertook a systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature. We searched six databases (2004–2015) for published studies on the provision of self-management support in one-to-one, face-to-face, patient–provider interactions for obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with 14 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Results: Themes identified from studies were (1) dominance of a traditional model of care, encompassing the provision of generic information, exclusion of the psychosocial and temporal nature of interactions and (2) a context of individual responsibility and accountability, encompassing self-management as patients’ responsibility and adherence, accountability and the attribution of blame. Interactions were constrained by consultation times, patient self-blame and guilt, desire for autonomy and beliefs about what constitutes ‘effective’ self-management. Discussion: Encounters were oriented towards a traditional model of care delivery and this limited opportunity for collaboration. These findings suggest that healthcare professionals remain in a position of authority, limiting opportunities for control to be shared with patients and shared understandings of social context to be developed.
KW - chronic conditions
KW - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
KW - obesity
KW - Patient–provider interactions
KW - self-management support
KW - type 2 diabetes mellitus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042074895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1742395317710082
DO - 10.1177/1742395317710082
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 28530114
AN - SCOPUS:85042074895
SN - 1742-3953
VL - 14
SP - 79
EP - 103
JO - Chronic Illness
JF - Chronic Illness
IS - 2
ER -