TY - JOUR
T1 - How receptive are patients to medical students in Australian hospitals? A cross-sectional survey of a public and a private hospital
AU - Tiong, Mark
AU - Oldroyd, John Charles
AU - Levinson, Michele Rose
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Medical student numbers in Australian universities have more than doubled since
2000. There are concerns about the ability for existing clinical training sites to
accommodate this increase in student numbers, and there have been calls to
increase training in private hospitals. The receptiveness of patients in private
hospitals will influence the success of such placements.
Aims:
We aimed to evaluate whether patients in a private hospital are as receptive to
medical students as patients in a public hospital.
Methods:
Cross-sectional survey of patients conducted at a private and a public teaching
hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Main outcome measures were willingness to
allow a medical student to participate in an interview, physical examination and
Page 3 of 21
Page 3 of 21
procedures (electrocardiogram, venepuncture and digital rectal examination) and
patient attitudes toward medical students as assessed by a series of 20 attitude
statements and a summative attitude score.
Results:
Patients at the private hospital were more willing than patients at the public
hospital to allow a medical student to take their history unsupervised (112/146;
76.7 v 90/141; 63.8 , p = 0.02). The distribution of patient willingness did not
otherwise differ between hospitals for physical examination or procedures.
There was no difference in the mean attitude score between hospitals (15.3 ? 0.8
private v 15.4 ? 1.2 public, p = 0.38) and responses differed between hospitals for
only four of the 20 attitude statements.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that patients in a private hospital are at least as receptive to
medical students as patients in a public hospital.
AB - Medical student numbers in Australian universities have more than doubled since
2000. There are concerns about the ability for existing clinical training sites to
accommodate this increase in student numbers, and there have been calls to
increase training in private hospitals. The receptiveness of patients in private
hospitals will influence the success of such placements.
Aims:
We aimed to evaluate whether patients in a private hospital are as receptive to
medical students as patients in a public hospital.
Methods:
Cross-sectional survey of patients conducted at a private and a public teaching
hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Main outcome measures were willingness to
allow a medical student to participate in an interview, physical examination and
Page 3 of 21
Page 3 of 21
procedures (electrocardiogram, venepuncture and digital rectal examination) and
patient attitudes toward medical students as assessed by a series of 20 attitude
statements and a summative attitude score.
Results:
Patients at the private hospital were more willing than patients at the public
hospital to allow a medical student to take their history unsupervised (112/146;
76.7 v 90/141; 63.8 , p = 0.02). The distribution of patient willingness did not
otherwise differ between hospitals for physical examination or procedures.
There was no difference in the mean attitude score between hospitals (15.3 ? 0.8
private v 15.4 ? 1.2 public, p = 0.38) and responses differed between hospitals for
only four of the 20 attitude statements.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that patients in a private hospital are at least as receptive to
medical students as patients in a public hospital.
UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22509870
U2 - 10.5694/mja11.11634
DO - 10.5694/mja11.11634
M3 - Letter
SN - 0025-729X
VL - 196
SP - 442
EP - 443
JO - The Medical Journal of Australia
JF - The Medical Journal of Australia
IS - 7
ER -