How receptive are patients to medical students in Australian hospitals? A cross-sectional survey of a public and a private hospital

Mark Tiong, John Charles Oldroyd, Michele Rose Levinson

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOther

Abstract

Medical student numbers in Australian universities have more than doubled since 2000. There are concerns about the ability for existing clinical training sites to accommodate this increase in student numbers, and there have been calls to increase training in private hospitals. The receptiveness of patients in private hospitals will influence the success of such placements. Aims: We aimed to evaluate whether patients in a private hospital are as receptive to medical students as patients in a public hospital. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of patients conducted at a private and a public teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Main outcome measures were willingness to allow a medical student to participate in an interview, physical examination and Page 3 of 21 Page 3 of 21 procedures (electrocardiogram, venepuncture and digital rectal examination) and patient attitudes toward medical students as assessed by a series of 20 attitude statements and a summative attitude score. Results: Patients at the private hospital were more willing than patients at the public hospital to allow a medical student to take their history unsupervised (112/146; 76.7 v 90/141; 63.8 , p = 0.02). The distribution of patient willingness did not otherwise differ between hospitals for physical examination or procedures. There was no difference in the mean attitude score between hospitals (15.3 ? 0.8 private v 15.4 ? 1.2 public, p = 0.38) and responses differed between hospitals for only four of the 20 attitude statements. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients in a private hospital are at least as receptive to medical students as patients in a public hospital.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442 - 443
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume196
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this

@article{954711113ce64383a5f82ede5b41ee2c,
title = "How receptive are patients to medical students in Australian hospitals? A cross-sectional survey of a public and a private hospital",
abstract = "Medical student numbers in Australian universities have more than doubled since 2000. There are concerns about the ability for existing clinical training sites to accommodate this increase in student numbers, and there have been calls to increase training in private hospitals. The receptiveness of patients in private hospitals will influence the success of such placements. Aims: We aimed to evaluate whether patients in a private hospital are as receptive to medical students as patients in a public hospital. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of patients conducted at a private and a public teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Main outcome measures were willingness to allow a medical student to participate in an interview, physical examination and Page 3 of 21 Page 3 of 21 procedures (electrocardiogram, venepuncture and digital rectal examination) and patient attitudes toward medical students as assessed by a series of 20 attitude statements and a summative attitude score. Results: Patients at the private hospital were more willing than patients at the public hospital to allow a medical student to take their history unsupervised (112/146; 76.7 v 90/141; 63.8 , p = 0.02). The distribution of patient willingness did not otherwise differ between hospitals for physical examination or procedures. There was no difference in the mean attitude score between hospitals (15.3 ? 0.8 private v 15.4 ? 1.2 public, p = 0.38) and responses differed between hospitals for only four of the 20 attitude statements. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients in a private hospital are at least as receptive to medical students as patients in a public hospital.",
author = "Mark Tiong and Oldroyd, {John Charles} and Levinson, {Michele Rose}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.5694/mja11.11634",
language = "English",
volume = "196",
pages = "442 -- 443",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AMPCo",
number = "7",

}

How receptive are patients to medical students in Australian hospitals? A cross-sectional survey of a public and a private hospital. / Tiong, Mark; Oldroyd, John Charles; Levinson, Michele Rose.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 196, No. 7, 2012, p. 442 - 443.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOther

TY - JOUR

T1 - How receptive are patients to medical students in Australian hospitals? A cross-sectional survey of a public and a private hospital

AU - Tiong, Mark

AU - Oldroyd, John Charles

AU - Levinson, Michele Rose

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Medical student numbers in Australian universities have more than doubled since 2000. There are concerns about the ability for existing clinical training sites to accommodate this increase in student numbers, and there have been calls to increase training in private hospitals. The receptiveness of patients in private hospitals will influence the success of such placements. Aims: We aimed to evaluate whether patients in a private hospital are as receptive to medical students as patients in a public hospital. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of patients conducted at a private and a public teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Main outcome measures were willingness to allow a medical student to participate in an interview, physical examination and Page 3 of 21 Page 3 of 21 procedures (electrocardiogram, venepuncture and digital rectal examination) and patient attitudes toward medical students as assessed by a series of 20 attitude statements and a summative attitude score. Results: Patients at the private hospital were more willing than patients at the public hospital to allow a medical student to take their history unsupervised (112/146; 76.7 v 90/141; 63.8 , p = 0.02). The distribution of patient willingness did not otherwise differ between hospitals for physical examination or procedures. There was no difference in the mean attitude score between hospitals (15.3 ? 0.8 private v 15.4 ? 1.2 public, p = 0.38) and responses differed between hospitals for only four of the 20 attitude statements. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients in a private hospital are at least as receptive to medical students as patients in a public hospital.

AB - Medical student numbers in Australian universities have more than doubled since 2000. There are concerns about the ability for existing clinical training sites to accommodate this increase in student numbers, and there have been calls to increase training in private hospitals. The receptiveness of patients in private hospitals will influence the success of such placements. Aims: We aimed to evaluate whether patients in a private hospital are as receptive to medical students as patients in a public hospital. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of patients conducted at a private and a public teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Main outcome measures were willingness to allow a medical student to participate in an interview, physical examination and Page 3 of 21 Page 3 of 21 procedures (electrocardiogram, venepuncture and digital rectal examination) and patient attitudes toward medical students as assessed by a series of 20 attitude statements and a summative attitude score. Results: Patients at the private hospital were more willing than patients at the public hospital to allow a medical student to take their history unsupervised (112/146; 76.7 v 90/141; 63.8 , p = 0.02). The distribution of patient willingness did not otherwise differ between hospitals for physical examination or procedures. There was no difference in the mean attitude score between hospitals (15.3 ? 0.8 private v 15.4 ? 1.2 public, p = 0.38) and responses differed between hospitals for only four of the 20 attitude statements. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients in a private hospital are at least as receptive to medical students as patients in a public hospital.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22509870

U2 - 10.5694/mja11.11634

DO - 10.5694/mja11.11634

M3 - Letter

VL - 196

SP - 442

EP - 443

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 7

ER -