Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover: Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment

Jennifer A Whitty, Jean Spinks, Tracey Bucknall, Georgia Tobiano, Wendy Chaboyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe and compare patients' and nurses' preferences for the implementation of bedside handover. Design: Discrete choice experiment describing handover choices using six characteristics: whether the patient is invited to participate; whether a family member/carer/friend is invited; the number of nurses present; the level of patient involvement; the information content; and privacy. Setting: Two Australian hospitals. Participants: Adult patients (n=401) and nurses (n=200) recruited from medical wards. Main outcome measures: Mean importance scores for handover characteristics estimated using mixed multinomial logit regression of the choice data. Results: Both patient and nurse participants preferred handover at the bedside rather than elsewhere (P<.05). Being invited to participate, supporting strong two-way communication, having a family member/carer/friend present and having two nurses rather than the nursing team present were most important for patients. Patients being invited to participate and supporting strong two-way communication were most important for nurses. However, contrary to patient preferences, having a family member/carer/friend present was not considered important by nurses. Further, while patients expressed a weak preference to have sensitive information handed over quietly at the bedside, nurses expressed a relatively strong preference for handover of sensitive information verbally away from the bedside. Conclusions: All participants strongly support handover at the bedside and want patients to participate although patient and nurse preferences for various aspects of bedside handover differ. An understanding of these preferences is expected to support recommendations for improving the patient hospital experience and the consistent implementation of bedside handover as a safety initiative.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)742-750
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • communication
  • discrete choice experiment
  • nursing
  • patient safety
  • preferences

Cite this

Whitty, Jennifer A ; Spinks, Jean ; Bucknall, Tracey ; Tobiano, Georgia ; Chaboyer, Wendy. / Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover : Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment. In: Health Expectations. 2017 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 742-750.
@article{b05b1684b019459899f3d33ad8dcfd10,
title = "Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover: Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment",
abstract = "Objective: To describe and compare patients' and nurses' preferences for the implementation of bedside handover. Design: Discrete choice experiment describing handover choices using six characteristics: whether the patient is invited to participate; whether a family member/carer/friend is invited; the number of nurses present; the level of patient involvement; the information content; and privacy. Setting: Two Australian hospitals. Participants: Adult patients (n=401) and nurses (n=200) recruited from medical wards. Main outcome measures: Mean importance scores for handover characteristics estimated using mixed multinomial logit regression of the choice data. Results: Both patient and nurse participants preferred handover at the bedside rather than elsewhere (P<.05). Being invited to participate, supporting strong two-way communication, having a family member/carer/friend present and having two nurses rather than the nursing team present were most important for patients. Patients being invited to participate and supporting strong two-way communication were most important for nurses. However, contrary to patient preferences, having a family member/carer/friend present was not considered important by nurses. Further, while patients expressed a weak preference to have sensitive information handed over quietly at the bedside, nurses expressed a relatively strong preference for handover of sensitive information verbally away from the bedside. Conclusions: All participants strongly support handover at the bedside and want patients to participate although patient and nurse preferences for various aspects of bedside handover differ. An understanding of these preferences is expected to support recommendations for improving the patient hospital experience and the consistent implementation of bedside handover as a safety initiative.",
keywords = "communication, discrete choice experiment, nursing, patient safety, preferences",
author = "Whitty, {Jennifer A} and Jean Spinks and Tracey Bucknall and Georgia Tobiano and Wendy Chaboyer",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/hex.12513",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "742--750",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover : Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment. / Whitty, Jennifer A; Spinks, Jean; Bucknall, Tracey; Tobiano, Georgia; Chaboyer, Wendy.

In: Health Expectations, Vol. 20, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 742-750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover

T2 - Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment

AU - Whitty, Jennifer A

AU - Spinks, Jean

AU - Bucknall, Tracey

AU - Tobiano, Georgia

AU - Chaboyer, Wendy

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Objective: To describe and compare patients' and nurses' preferences for the implementation of bedside handover. Design: Discrete choice experiment describing handover choices using six characteristics: whether the patient is invited to participate; whether a family member/carer/friend is invited; the number of nurses present; the level of patient involvement; the information content; and privacy. Setting: Two Australian hospitals. Participants: Adult patients (n=401) and nurses (n=200) recruited from medical wards. Main outcome measures: Mean importance scores for handover characteristics estimated using mixed multinomial logit regression of the choice data. Results: Both patient and nurse participants preferred handover at the bedside rather than elsewhere (P<.05). Being invited to participate, supporting strong two-way communication, having a family member/carer/friend present and having two nurses rather than the nursing team present were most important for patients. Patients being invited to participate and supporting strong two-way communication were most important for nurses. However, contrary to patient preferences, having a family member/carer/friend present was not considered important by nurses. Further, while patients expressed a weak preference to have sensitive information handed over quietly at the bedside, nurses expressed a relatively strong preference for handover of sensitive information verbally away from the bedside. Conclusions: All participants strongly support handover at the bedside and want patients to participate although patient and nurse preferences for various aspects of bedside handover differ. An understanding of these preferences is expected to support recommendations for improving the patient hospital experience and the consistent implementation of bedside handover as a safety initiative.

AB - Objective: To describe and compare patients' and nurses' preferences for the implementation of bedside handover. Design: Discrete choice experiment describing handover choices using six characteristics: whether the patient is invited to participate; whether a family member/carer/friend is invited; the number of nurses present; the level of patient involvement; the information content; and privacy. Setting: Two Australian hospitals. Participants: Adult patients (n=401) and nurses (n=200) recruited from medical wards. Main outcome measures: Mean importance scores for handover characteristics estimated using mixed multinomial logit regression of the choice data. Results: Both patient and nurse participants preferred handover at the bedside rather than elsewhere (P<.05). Being invited to participate, supporting strong two-way communication, having a family member/carer/friend present and having two nurses rather than the nursing team present were most important for patients. Patients being invited to participate and supporting strong two-way communication were most important for nurses. However, contrary to patient preferences, having a family member/carer/friend present was not considered important by nurses. Further, while patients expressed a weak preference to have sensitive information handed over quietly at the bedside, nurses expressed a relatively strong preference for handover of sensitive information verbally away from the bedside. Conclusions: All participants strongly support handover at the bedside and want patients to participate although patient and nurse preferences for various aspects of bedside handover differ. An understanding of these preferences is expected to support recommendations for improving the patient hospital experience and the consistent implementation of bedside handover as a safety initiative.

KW - communication

KW - discrete choice experiment

KW - nursing

KW - patient safety

KW - preferences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996843142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/hex.12513

DO - 10.1111/hex.12513

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84996843142

VL - 20

SP - 742

EP - 750

JO - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 4

ER -