Patented drug extension strategies on healthcare spending: a cost-evaluation analysis

Nathalie Vernaz, Guy Haller, Francois Girardin, Benedikt Huttner, Christophe Combescure, Pierre Dayer, Daniel Muscionico, Jean-Luc Salomon, Pascal Bonnabry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drug manufacturers have developed evergreening strategies to compete with generic medication after patent termination. These include marketing of slightly modified follow-on drugs. We aimed to estimate the financial impact of these drugs on overall healthcare costs and also to examine the impact of listing these drugs in hospital restrictive drug formularies (RDFs) on the healthcare system as a whole (``spillover effect??). Methods and Findings: We used hospital and community pharmacy invoice office data in the Swiss canton of Geneva to calculate utilisation of eight follow-on drugs in defined daily doses between 2000 and 2008. ``Extra costs?? were calculated for three different scenarios assuming replacement with the corresponding generic equivalent for prescriptions of (1) all brand (i.e., initially patented) drugs, (2) all follow-on drugs, or (3) brand and follow-on drugs. To examine the financial spillover effect we calculated a monthly follow-on drug market share in defined daily doses for medications prescribed by hospital physicians but dispensed in community pharmacies, in comparison to drugs prescribed by non-hospital physicians in the community. Estimated ``extra costs?? over the study period were J15.9 (95 CI 15.5; 16.2) million for scenario 1, J14.4 (95 CI 14.1; 14.7) million for scenario 2, and J30.3 (95 CI 29.8; 30.8) million for scenario 3. The impact of strictly switching all patients using proton-pump inhibitors to esomeprazole at admission resulted in a spillover ``extra cost?? of J330,300 (95 CI 276,100; 383,800), whereas strictly switching to generic cetirizine resulted in savings of J7,700 (95 CI 4,100; 11,100). Overall we estimated that the RDF resulted in ``extra costs?? of J503,600 (95 CI 444,500; 563,100). Conclusions: Evergreening strategies have been successful in maintaining market share in Geneva, offsetting competition by generics and cost containment policies. Hospitals may be contributin
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1001460
Number of pages11
JournalPLoS Medicine
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this