TY - JOUR
T1 - Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint loading during a single-leg forward hop following ACL reconstruction
AU - Sritharan, Prasanna
AU - Schache, Anthony G.
AU - Culvenor, Adam G.
AU - Perraton, Luke G.
AU - Bryant, Adam L.
AU - Morris, Hayden G.
AU - Whitehead, Timothy S.
AU - Crossley, Kay M.
N1 - Funding Information:
A.G. Culvenor is a recipient of a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Early Career Fellowship (Neil Hamilton Fairley Clinical Fellowship, APP1121173). All authors declare no conflict of interest. This study was finalised, written and originally submitted in 2020, an extraordinary year. To all those on the front line, including healthcare staff, emergency workers, uniformed services, shop workers, cleaners, drivers, teachers, and many others, thank you for everything you have done, and continue to do, during these challenging and uncertain times.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Altered biomechanics are frequently observed following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Yet, little is known about knee-joint loading, particularly in the patellofemoral-joint, despite patellofemoral-joint osteoarthritis commonly occurring post-ACLR. This study compared knee-joint reaction forces and impulses during the landing phase of a single-leg forward hop in the reconstructed knee of people 12-24 months post-ACLR and uninjured controls. Experimental marker data and ground forces for 66 participants with ACLR (28 ± 6 years, 78 ± 15 kg) and 33 uninjured controls (26 ± 5 years, 70 ± 12 kg) were input into scaled-generic musculoskeletal models to calculate joint angles, joint moments, muscle forces, and the knee-joint reaction forces and impulses. The ACLR group exhibited a lower peak knee flexion angle (mean difference: −6°; 95% confidence interval: [−10°, −2°]), internal knee extension moment (−3.63 [−5.29, −1.97] percentage of body weight × participant height (body weight [BW] × HT), external knee adduction moment (-1.36 [−2.16, −0.56]% BW × HT) and quadriceps force (−2.02 [−2.95, −1.09] BW). The ACLR group also exhibited a lower peak patellofemoral-joint compressive force (−2.24 [−3.31, −1.18] BW), net tibiofemoral-joint compressive force (−0.74 [−1.20, 0.28] BW), and medial compartment force (−0.76 [−1.08, −0.44] BW). Finally, only the impulse of the patellofemoral-joint compressive force was lower in the ACLR group (−0.13 [−0.23, −0.03] body weight-seconds). Lower compressive forces are evident in the patellofemoral- and tibiofemoral-joints of ACLR knees compared to uninjured controls during a single-leg forward hop-landing task. Our findings may have implications for understanding the contributing factors for incidence and progression of knee osteoarthritis after ACLR surgery.
AB - Altered biomechanics are frequently observed following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Yet, little is known about knee-joint loading, particularly in the patellofemoral-joint, despite patellofemoral-joint osteoarthritis commonly occurring post-ACLR. This study compared knee-joint reaction forces and impulses during the landing phase of a single-leg forward hop in the reconstructed knee of people 12-24 months post-ACLR and uninjured controls. Experimental marker data and ground forces for 66 participants with ACLR (28 ± 6 years, 78 ± 15 kg) and 33 uninjured controls (26 ± 5 years, 70 ± 12 kg) were input into scaled-generic musculoskeletal models to calculate joint angles, joint moments, muscle forces, and the knee-joint reaction forces and impulses. The ACLR group exhibited a lower peak knee flexion angle (mean difference: −6°; 95% confidence interval: [−10°, −2°]), internal knee extension moment (−3.63 [−5.29, −1.97] percentage of body weight × participant height (body weight [BW] × HT), external knee adduction moment (-1.36 [−2.16, −0.56]% BW × HT) and quadriceps force (−2.02 [−2.95, −1.09] BW). The ACLR group also exhibited a lower peak patellofemoral-joint compressive force (−2.24 [−3.31, −1.18] BW), net tibiofemoral-joint compressive force (−0.74 [−1.20, 0.28] BW), and medial compartment force (−0.76 [−1.08, −0.44] BW). Finally, only the impulse of the patellofemoral-joint compressive force was lower in the ACLR group (−0.13 [−0.23, −0.03] body weight-seconds). Lower compressive forces are evident in the patellofemoral- and tibiofemoral-joints of ACLR knees compared to uninjured controls during a single-leg forward hop-landing task. Our findings may have implications for understanding the contributing factors for incidence and progression of knee osteoarthritis after ACLR surgery.
KW - ACL injury
KW - contact force
KW - knee osteoarthritis
KW - musculoskeletal modelling
KW - posttraumatic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105184484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jor.25053
DO - 10.1002/jor.25053
M3 - Article
C2 - 33871078
AN - SCOPUS:85105184484
SN - 0736-0266
VL - 40
SP - 159
EP - 169
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Research
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Research
IS - 1
ER -