TY - JOUR
T1 - Passive collection of geolocation data by older people with cognitive impairment
T2 - Feasibility and user experiences for use in research
AU - Liddle, Jacki
AU - Ireland, David
AU - Krysinska, Karolina
AU - Lamont, Robyn
AU - Kang, Kristan
AU - Reppermund, Simone
AU - Sachdev, Perminder S.
AU - Gustafsson, Louise
AU - Brauer, Sandra
AU - Pachana, Nancy A.
AU - Brodaty, Henry
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was funded by a Dementia Collaborative Research Centre Assessment and Better Care grant. The Memory and Ageing Study was funded by three NHMRC Program grants. The funding bodies played no part in the design or conduct of research, analysis of data or writing of manuscript or choice of publication venue.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Gerontechnology. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: The community mobility and engagement of older people is an important aspect of health and quality of life. Population studies and clinical trials are important for understanding ageing-related experiences, needs, and impacts of interventions. Passive collection of data through sensors could help to build the understanding of community lives, potentially without adding to participant burden or requiring an accurate recall. There are assumptions that technology-based data collection may not be feasible or acceptable for older people with cognitive impairment. Technology development and evaluation needs to engage with the direct perspectives of users with cognitive impairment to build an understanding of usability, acceptability, and ethical considerations. Objective: To explore the feasibility, user experiences, and processes needed to support the smartphone-based collection of older people with cognitive impairment. Method: An exploratory study, embedded within a longitudinal observational study, invited older adults to collect geolocation data for one week using smartphones and Bluetooth beacons. A process to support consent, transparency of data collection, and accessibility eredeveloped. Experiences and reflections on data collection were gathered via audio-recorded semi-structured interviews and field notes. Inductive content analysis was conducted. Results: Eighteen older adults (15 with mild cognitive impairment, 3 with probable dementia; age M=86.7 years; 8 men) collected geolocation data. Most completed a week of data collection and considered it a positive experience. On average 161.5 hours (SD 31.7) of geolocation data were collected over a week. Reported user experiences included technical issues, consent and concerns, acceptability, and accessibility. Some support and reassurance were required, along with time to gain familiarity. Participants reportedly enjoyed engaging with their collected lifespace data. Conclusion: Older adults with cognitive impairment were able to collect geolocation data following an accessible and ethical process. Future work may increase usability and engagement between participants and their data to build insights.
AB - Background: The community mobility and engagement of older people is an important aspect of health and quality of life. Population studies and clinical trials are important for understanding ageing-related experiences, needs, and impacts of interventions. Passive collection of data through sensors could help to build the understanding of community lives, potentially without adding to participant burden or requiring an accurate recall. There are assumptions that technology-based data collection may not be feasible or acceptable for older people with cognitive impairment. Technology development and evaluation needs to engage with the direct perspectives of users with cognitive impairment to build an understanding of usability, acceptability, and ethical considerations. Objective: To explore the feasibility, user experiences, and processes needed to support the smartphone-based collection of older people with cognitive impairment. Method: An exploratory study, embedded within a longitudinal observational study, invited older adults to collect geolocation data for one week using smartphones and Bluetooth beacons. A process to support consent, transparency of data collection, and accessibility eredeveloped. Experiences and reflections on data collection were gathered via audio-recorded semi-structured interviews and field notes. Inductive content analysis was conducted. Results: Eighteen older adults (15 with mild cognitive impairment, 3 with probable dementia; age M=86.7 years; 8 men) collected geolocation data. Most completed a week of data collection and considered it a positive experience. On average 161.5 hours (SD 31.7) of geolocation data were collected over a week. Reported user experiences included technical issues, consent and concerns, acceptability, and accessibility. Some support and reassurance were required, along with time to gain familiarity. Participants reportedly enjoyed engaging with their collected lifespace data. Conclusion: Older adults with cognitive impairment were able to collect geolocation data following an accessible and ethical process. Future work may increase usability and engagement between participants and their data to build insights.
KW - community
KW - gerontology
KW - mobility restriction
KW - smartphone
KW - usability testing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85162182879
U2 - 10.4017/GT.2023.22.1.811.05
DO - 10.4017/GT.2023.22.1.811.05
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85162182879
SN - 1569-1101
VL - 22
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Gerontechnology
JF - Gerontechnology
IS - 1
ER -