Part 2: Evidence evaluation and management of conflicts of interest: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations

Peter T. Morley, Eddy Lang, Richard Aickin, John E. Billi, Brian Eigel, Jose Maria E. Ferrer, Judith C. Finn, Lana M. Gent, Russell E. Griffin, Mary Fran Hazinski, Ian K. Maconochie, William H. Montgomery, Laurie J Morrison, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Nikolaos I. Nikolaou, Jerry P. Nolan, Gavin D. Perkins, Michael R. Sayre, Andrew H. Travers, Jonathan WyllieDavid A. Zideman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)


The process for evaluating the resuscitation science has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades. The current process, which incorporates the use of the GRADE methodology, culminated in the 2015 CoSTR publication, which in turn will inform the international resuscitation councils' guideline development processes. Over the next few years, the process will continue to evolve as ILCOR moves toward a more continuous evaluation of the resuscitation science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S40-S50
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2015


  • Cardiac arrest
  • Conflict of interest
  • Evidence evaluation
  • Resuscitation

Cite this