Parole, politics and penal policy

Arie Freiberg, Lorana Bartels, Robin Fitzgerald, Shannon Dodd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the most recent changes in Australian parole laws, policies and practices in the context of the changing relations between legislatures, the courts and parole authorities. It argues that legislatures, purportedly reflecting public opinion, have become less willing to trust either the courts or parole boards and have eroded their authority, powers and discretion. It provides examples of legislative changes that have altered the purposes of parole and introduced mandatory or presumptive non-parole periods, as well as overriding, by-passing and restricting parole.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-215
Number of pages26
JournalQUT Law Review
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this