Paramedic tracheal intubation using the intubating laryngeal mask airway

Michael J. McCall, Mark Reeves, Marcus Skinner, Corinne Ginifer, Paul Myles, Noel Dalwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective. Tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) has been evaluated, in controlled settings, as an acceptable alternative to laryngoscopic intubation. Our observational study was designed to examine the success rate of tracheal intubation using the ILMA in the prehospital setting after mannequin-based training. Methods. We examined all oral tracheal intubations performed by the Tasmanian Ambulance Service (TAS) from April 2005 to April 2006. TAS paramedics are occasional intubators, as defined in the study by Reeves et al.,8 on average performing two intubations per paramedic per year. Fifty-eight paramedics received training in tracheal intubation through the ILMA. The primary outcome measure was tracheal intubation success. Our hypothesis was that paramedics would be able to successfully perform out-of-hospital tracheal intubation using the ILMA with minimal training. Results. During the study period, 106 patients had out-of-hospital tracheal intubation performed by ambulance paramedics. Comparisons were made between the intubations with the ILMA and by laryngoscopy. The overall intubation success rate was 91% with the laryngoscope and 92% with the ILMA. The success rate for the first attempt at intubation was higher with the ILMA (81%) than with direct laryngoscopy (57%) (RR (95% CI): 1.74 (95% CI: 1.18-2.59, p = 0.009), regardless of ultimate success. The success rate when intubating unconscious patients using the ILMA was significantly higher (88%) than intubation using the laryngoscope (63%). These intubations were achieved without the administration of any sedation or paralytic medication. Conclusions. Intubation via the ILMA was as successful as conventional laryngoscopic intubation, requiring fewer attempts, although this was not statistically significant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-34
Number of pages5
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2008

Keywords

  • Emergency medical service
  • Intratracheal intubation
  • Intubation
  • Laryngeal masks
  • Prehospital emergency care

Cite this

McCall, Michael J. ; Reeves, Mark ; Skinner, Marcus ; Ginifer, Corinne ; Myles, Paul ; Dalwood, Noel. / Paramedic tracheal intubation using the intubating laryngeal mask airway. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2008 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 30-34.
@article{cb65aa83c7514a7c8c91f027a721ef09,
title = "Paramedic tracheal intubation using the intubating laryngeal mask airway",
abstract = "Objective. Tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) has been evaluated, in controlled settings, as an acceptable alternative to laryngoscopic intubation. Our observational study was designed to examine the success rate of tracheal intubation using the ILMA in the prehospital setting after mannequin-based training. Methods. We examined all oral tracheal intubations performed by the Tasmanian Ambulance Service (TAS) from April 2005 to April 2006. TAS paramedics are occasional intubators, as defined in the study by Reeves et al.,8 on average performing two intubations per paramedic per year. Fifty-eight paramedics received training in tracheal intubation through the ILMA. The primary outcome measure was tracheal intubation success. Our hypothesis was that paramedics would be able to successfully perform out-of-hospital tracheal intubation using the ILMA with minimal training. Results. During the study period, 106 patients had out-of-hospital tracheal intubation performed by ambulance paramedics. Comparisons were made between the intubations with the ILMA and by laryngoscopy. The overall intubation success rate was 91{\%} with the laryngoscope and 92{\%} with the ILMA. The success rate for the first attempt at intubation was higher with the ILMA (81{\%}) than with direct laryngoscopy (57{\%}) (RR (95{\%} CI): 1.74 (95{\%} CI: 1.18-2.59, p = 0.009), regardless of ultimate success. The success rate when intubating unconscious patients using the ILMA was significantly higher (88{\%}) than intubation using the laryngoscope (63{\%}). These intubations were achieved without the administration of any sedation or paralytic medication. Conclusions. Intubation via the ILMA was as successful as conventional laryngoscopic intubation, requiring fewer attempts, although this was not statistically significant.",
keywords = "Emergency medical service, Intratracheal intubation, Intubation, Laryngeal masks, Prehospital emergency care",
author = "McCall, {Michael J.} and Mark Reeves and Marcus Skinner and Corinne Ginifer and Paul Myles and Noel Dalwood",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10903120701709803",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "30--34",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Paramedic tracheal intubation using the intubating laryngeal mask airway. / McCall, Michael J.; Reeves, Mark; Skinner, Marcus; Ginifer, Corinne; Myles, Paul; Dalwood, Noel.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 30-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paramedic tracheal intubation using the intubating laryngeal mask airway

AU - McCall, Michael J.

AU - Reeves, Mark

AU - Skinner, Marcus

AU - Ginifer, Corinne

AU - Myles, Paul

AU - Dalwood, Noel

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - Objective. Tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) has been evaluated, in controlled settings, as an acceptable alternative to laryngoscopic intubation. Our observational study was designed to examine the success rate of tracheal intubation using the ILMA in the prehospital setting after mannequin-based training. Methods. We examined all oral tracheal intubations performed by the Tasmanian Ambulance Service (TAS) from April 2005 to April 2006. TAS paramedics are occasional intubators, as defined in the study by Reeves et al.,8 on average performing two intubations per paramedic per year. Fifty-eight paramedics received training in tracheal intubation through the ILMA. The primary outcome measure was tracheal intubation success. Our hypothesis was that paramedics would be able to successfully perform out-of-hospital tracheal intubation using the ILMA with minimal training. Results. During the study period, 106 patients had out-of-hospital tracheal intubation performed by ambulance paramedics. Comparisons were made between the intubations with the ILMA and by laryngoscopy. The overall intubation success rate was 91% with the laryngoscope and 92% with the ILMA. The success rate for the first attempt at intubation was higher with the ILMA (81%) than with direct laryngoscopy (57%) (RR (95% CI): 1.74 (95% CI: 1.18-2.59, p = 0.009), regardless of ultimate success. The success rate when intubating unconscious patients using the ILMA was significantly higher (88%) than intubation using the laryngoscope (63%). These intubations were achieved without the administration of any sedation or paralytic medication. Conclusions. Intubation via the ILMA was as successful as conventional laryngoscopic intubation, requiring fewer attempts, although this was not statistically significant.

AB - Objective. Tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) has been evaluated, in controlled settings, as an acceptable alternative to laryngoscopic intubation. Our observational study was designed to examine the success rate of tracheal intubation using the ILMA in the prehospital setting after mannequin-based training. Methods. We examined all oral tracheal intubations performed by the Tasmanian Ambulance Service (TAS) from April 2005 to April 2006. TAS paramedics are occasional intubators, as defined in the study by Reeves et al.,8 on average performing two intubations per paramedic per year. Fifty-eight paramedics received training in tracheal intubation through the ILMA. The primary outcome measure was tracheal intubation success. Our hypothesis was that paramedics would be able to successfully perform out-of-hospital tracheal intubation using the ILMA with minimal training. Results. During the study period, 106 patients had out-of-hospital tracheal intubation performed by ambulance paramedics. Comparisons were made between the intubations with the ILMA and by laryngoscopy. The overall intubation success rate was 91% with the laryngoscope and 92% with the ILMA. The success rate for the first attempt at intubation was higher with the ILMA (81%) than with direct laryngoscopy (57%) (RR (95% CI): 1.74 (95% CI: 1.18-2.59, p = 0.009), regardless of ultimate success. The success rate when intubating unconscious patients using the ILMA was significantly higher (88%) than intubation using the laryngoscope (63%). These intubations were achieved without the administration of any sedation or paralytic medication. Conclusions. Intubation via the ILMA was as successful as conventional laryngoscopic intubation, requiring fewer attempts, although this was not statistically significant.

KW - Emergency medical service

KW - Intratracheal intubation

KW - Intubation

KW - Laryngeal masks

KW - Prehospital emergency care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149116939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903120701709803

DO - 10.1080/10903120701709803

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 30

EP - 34

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 1

ER -