TY - JOUR
T1 - Outsourcing ethical dilemmas
T2 - regulating international surrogacy arrangements
AU - Fenton-Glynn, Claire
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - This article argues that the English legislative regime is ineffective in regulating international surrogacy, particularly with regard to commercial payments. It suggests that if English law views surrogacy as exploitative, we have a responsibility to protect women both in England and abroad, and the only way to do so effectively is to create a domestic system of regulation that caters adequately for the demand in this country. This requires a system of authorisation for surrogacy before it is undertaken; ex-post facto examinations of agreements completed in other jurisdictions, after the child is already living with the commissioning parents, cannot be seen as an acceptable compromise, as authorisation will inevitably be granted in the child's best interests.
AB - This article argues that the English legislative regime is ineffective in regulating international surrogacy, particularly with regard to commercial payments. It suggests that if English law views surrogacy as exploitative, we have a responsibility to protect women both in England and abroad, and the only way to do so effectively is to create a domestic system of regulation that caters adequately for the demand in this country. This requires a system of authorisation for surrogacy before it is undertaken; ex-post facto examinations of agreements completed in other jurisdictions, after the child is already living with the commissioning parents, cannot be seen as an acceptable compromise, as authorisation will inevitably be granted in the child's best interests.
KW - Best interests of the child
KW - Human fertilisation and embryology act 2008
KW - International surrogacy
KW - Medical tourism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959863947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/medlaw/fwv044
DO - 10.1093/medlaw/fwv044
M3 - Article
C2 - 26785890
AN - SCOPUS:84959863947
SN - 0967-0742
VL - 24
SP - 59
EP - 75
JO - Medical Law Review
JF - Medical Law Review
IS - 1
ER -