Outcomes, satiety, and adverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

Paul Burton, Wendy Brown, Cheryl Laurie, Minjae Lee, Anna Korin, Margaret Anderson, Geoffrey Hebbard, Paul O'Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Follow-up is critical to the success of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Few data guide this and expected norms of satiety, adverse symptoms, and outcomes have not been defined. Methods Consecutive patients, who underwent LAGB, were evaluated using a newly developed instrument that assessed satiety, adverse upper gastrointestinal (dysphagia, reflux, and epigastric pain), and outcomes (overall satisfaction, weight loss, and quality of life (SF-36)). Results Three hundred twenty-three of 408 patients responded (80 ; mean age 44.4a??A?a??11.8 years, 56 males). Excess weight loss was 52 . Satiety was greater at breakfast compared to lunch (5.3a??A?a??1.9 vs.4.1a??A?a??1.7, pa??
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)574 - 581
Number of pages7
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Cite this

Burton, Paul ; Brown, Wendy ; Laurie, Cheryl ; Lee, Minjae ; Korin, Anna ; Anderson, Margaret ; Hebbard, Geoffrey ; O'Brien, Paul. / Outcomes, satiety, and adverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. In: Obesity Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 21. pp. 574 - 581.
@article{987306aadc894793b868a65ea7154e77,
title = "Outcomes, satiety, and adverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding",
abstract = "Background Follow-up is critical to the success of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Few data guide this and expected norms of satiety, adverse symptoms, and outcomes have not been defined. Methods Consecutive patients, who underwent LAGB, were evaluated using a newly developed instrument that assessed satiety, adverse upper gastrointestinal (dysphagia, reflux, and epigastric pain), and outcomes (overall satisfaction, weight loss, and quality of life (SF-36)). Results Three hundred twenty-three of 408 patients responded (80 ; mean age 44.4a??A?a??11.8 years, 56 males). Excess weight loss was 52 . Satiety was greater at breakfast compared to lunch (5.3a??A?a??1.9 vs.4.1a??A?a??1.7, pa??",
author = "Paul Burton and Wendy Brown and Cheryl Laurie and Minjae Lee and Anna Korin and Margaret Anderson and Geoffrey Hebbard and Paul O'Brien",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/s11695-010-0073-7",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "574 -- 581",
journal = "Obesity Surgery",
issn = "0960-8923",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",

}

Outcomes, satiety, and adverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. / Burton, Paul; Brown, Wendy; Laurie, Cheryl; Lee, Minjae; Korin, Anna; Anderson, Margaret; Hebbard, Geoffrey; O'Brien, Paul.

In: Obesity Surgery, Vol. 21, 2011, p. 574 - 581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes, satiety, and adverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

AU - Burton, Paul

AU - Brown, Wendy

AU - Laurie, Cheryl

AU - Lee, Minjae

AU - Korin, Anna

AU - Anderson, Margaret

AU - Hebbard, Geoffrey

AU - O'Brien, Paul

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background Follow-up is critical to the success of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Few data guide this and expected norms of satiety, adverse symptoms, and outcomes have not been defined. Methods Consecutive patients, who underwent LAGB, were evaluated using a newly developed instrument that assessed satiety, adverse upper gastrointestinal (dysphagia, reflux, and epigastric pain), and outcomes (overall satisfaction, weight loss, and quality of life (SF-36)). Results Three hundred twenty-three of 408 patients responded (80 ; mean age 44.4a??A?a??11.8 years, 56 males). Excess weight loss was 52 . Satiety was greater at breakfast compared to lunch (5.3a??A?a??1.9 vs.4.1a??A?a??1.7, pa??

AB - Background Follow-up is critical to the success of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Few data guide this and expected norms of satiety, adverse symptoms, and outcomes have not been defined. Methods Consecutive patients, who underwent LAGB, were evaluated using a newly developed instrument that assessed satiety, adverse upper gastrointestinal (dysphagia, reflux, and epigastric pain), and outcomes (overall satisfaction, weight loss, and quality of life (SF-36)). Results Three hundred twenty-three of 408 patients responded (80 ; mean age 44.4a??A?a??11.8 years, 56 males). Excess weight loss was 52 . Satiety was greater at breakfast compared to lunch (5.3a??A?a??1.9 vs.4.1a??A?a??1.7, pa??

UR - http://www.springerlink.com/content/3830200857g87743/fulltext.html

U2 - 10.1007/s11695-010-0073-7

DO - 10.1007/s11695-010-0073-7

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 574

EP - 581

JO - Obesity Surgery

JF - Obesity Surgery

SN - 0960-8923

ER -