Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube insertion at a tertiary hospital

Richard La Nauze; Kathryn Collins; Stuart Lyon; Michael John Bailey; William Kemp; Ibolya Nyulasi; Stuart Keith Roberts

doi:10.1016/j.clnme.2012.05.001Document

Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube insertion at a tertiary hospital

Richard La Nauze, Kathryn Collins, Stuart Lyon, Michael John Bailey, William Kemp, Ibolya Nyulasi, Stuart Keith Roberts

Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Alfred Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Both PEG and RIG insertion techniques compare favourably in terms of the majority of major and minor complications and long-term outcomes. However tube dislodgment rates are significantly higher following RIG insertion supporting an endoscopic approach where possible to minimise the risk of tube malposition resulting in peritoneal contamination.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e144 - e148
Number of pages	5
Journal	e-SPEN
Volume	7
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnme.2012.05.001Document
Publication status	Published - 2012

Access to Document

10.1016/j.clnme.2012.05.001Document

RM sElocation

Cite this

@article{2991b7d5514b4ef99e53425e84a216a9,

title = "Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube insertion at a tertiary hospital",

abstract = "Both PEG and RIG insertion techniques compare favourably in terms of the majority of major and minor complications and long-term outcomes. However tube dislodgment rates are significantly higher following RIG insertion supporting an endoscopic approach where possible to minimise the risk of tube malposition resulting in peritoneal contamination.",

author = "{La Nauze}, Richard and Kathryn Collins and Stuart Lyon and Bailey, {Michael John} and William Kemp and Ibolya Nyulasi and Roberts, {Stuart Keith}",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1016/j.clnme.2012.05.001Document",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

pages = "e144 -- e148",

journal = "e-SPEN",

issn = "1751-4991",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "4",

}

Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube insertion at a tertiary hospital. / La Nauze, Richard; Collins, Kathryn; Lyon, Stuart; Bailey, Michael John ; Kemp, William ; Nyulasi, Ibolya ; Roberts, Stuart Keith.

In: e-SPEN, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2012, p. e144 - e148.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube insertion at a tertiary hospital

AU - La Nauze, Richard

AU - Collins, Kathryn

AU - Lyon, Stuart

AU - Bailey, Michael John

AU - Kemp, William

AU - Nyulasi, Ibolya

AU - Roberts, Stuart Keith

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Both PEG and RIG insertion techniques compare favourably in terms of the majority of major and minor complications and long-term outcomes. However tube dislodgment rates are significantly higher following RIG insertion supporting an endoscopic approach where possible to minimise the risk of tube malposition resulting in peritoneal contamination.

AB - Both PEG and RIG insertion techniques compare favourably in terms of the majority of major and minor complications and long-term outcomes. However tube dislodgment rates are significantly higher following RIG insertion supporting an endoscopic approach where possible to minimise the risk of tube malposition resulting in peritoneal contamination.

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212826312000243

U2 - 10.1016/j.clnme.2012.05.001Document

DO - 10.1016/j.clnme.2012.05.001Document

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - e144 - e148

JO - e-SPEN

JF - e-SPEN

SN - 1751-4991

IS - 4

ER -