TY - JOUR
T1 - Organisational survey for acute stroke care in Vietnam
T2 - Regional Collaboration Programme
AU - Phan, Hoang T.
AU - Nguyen, Thang H.
AU - Watkins, Caroline
AU - Lightbody, Elizabeth
AU - Boaden, Elizabeth
AU - Georgiou, Rachel
AU - Middleton, Sandy
AU - Dale, Simeon
AU - Kilkenny, Monique F.
AU - Pandian, Jeyaraj
AU - Grimley, Rohan S.
AU - Nguyen, Trung Q.
AU - Cadilhac, Dominique A.
N1 - Funding Information:
In-kind support is provided by the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan, UK) through their Quality Research Global Challenge Research Fund (qr-GCRF) funding scheme which allocates funding from Research England. The project also received in-kind support from Australian Catholic University & St Vincent's Health, Australia; University of Queensland, Australia; Christian Medical College - Ludhiana, India; 115 People's Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Boehringer Ingelheim in Vietnam*; and Ministry of Health, Vietnam.
Funding Information:
Funding for this work, as part of the Regional Collaborations Programme, is provided by Monash University and the Australian Academy of Science , on behalf of the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science. The Regional Collaborations Programme is supported by the Australian Government under the National Innovation and Science Agenda . Author MFK was supported by a Future Leader Fellowship ( #105737 ), National Heart Foundation of Australia . Author DAC acknowledges research fellowship support from the National Health and Medical Research Council ( #1154273 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Objectives: Low-middle income countries, such as Vietnam have a greater burden from stroke than high-income countries. Few health professionals have stroke specialist training, and the quality of care may vary between hospitals. To support improvements to stroke care, we aimed to gain a better understanding of the resources available in hospitals in Vietnam to manage acute stroke. Materials and methods: The survey questions were adapted from the Australian Organisational Survey of Stroke Services (Stroke Foundation). The final 65 questions covered the topics: hospital size and admissions for stroke; use of clinical protocols and assessments conducted; team structure and coordination; communication and team roles. The survey was distributed electronically or via paper form in Vietnamese to clinical leaders of 91 eligible hospitals (November–December 2020). Data were summarised descriptively. Results: Sixty-six (73%) hospitals responded, and doctors predominately completed the survey (98%). Approximately 70% of hospitals had a stroke unit; median 630 acute strokes/year (IQR: 250-1200) and >90% used stroke clinical protocols. The daytime nurse-patient ratio was 1:4. There was a perceived lack of access to allied health staff, including psychologists/neuropsychologists, occupational therapists, and speech pathologists. Only 50% reported having a standardised rehabilitation assessment process. Conclusions: This is the first large-scale cross-sectional, national overview of stroke services in Vietnam. Future research should include a systematic clinical audit of stroke care to confirm aspects of the data from these hospitals. Repeating the survey in future years will enable the tracking of progress and may influence capacity building for stroke care in Vietnam.
AB - Objectives: Low-middle income countries, such as Vietnam have a greater burden from stroke than high-income countries. Few health professionals have stroke specialist training, and the quality of care may vary between hospitals. To support improvements to stroke care, we aimed to gain a better understanding of the resources available in hospitals in Vietnam to manage acute stroke. Materials and methods: The survey questions were adapted from the Australian Organisational Survey of Stroke Services (Stroke Foundation). The final 65 questions covered the topics: hospital size and admissions for stroke; use of clinical protocols and assessments conducted; team structure and coordination; communication and team roles. The survey was distributed electronically or via paper form in Vietnamese to clinical leaders of 91 eligible hospitals (November–December 2020). Data were summarised descriptively. Results: Sixty-six (73%) hospitals responded, and doctors predominately completed the survey (98%). Approximately 70% of hospitals had a stroke unit; median 630 acute strokes/year (IQR: 250-1200) and >90% used stroke clinical protocols. The daytime nurse-patient ratio was 1:4. There was a perceived lack of access to allied health staff, including psychologists/neuropsychologists, occupational therapists, and speech pathologists. Only 50% reported having a standardised rehabilitation assessment process. Conclusions: This is the first large-scale cross-sectional, national overview of stroke services in Vietnam. Future research should include a systematic clinical audit of stroke care to confirm aspects of the data from these hospitals. Repeating the survey in future years will enable the tracking of progress and may influence capacity building for stroke care in Vietnam.
KW - Acute care
KW - Hospitals
KW - Organisational survey
KW - Stroke
KW - Thrombolysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138824744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106792
DO - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106792
M3 - Article
C2 - 36174327
AN - SCOPUS:85138824744
SN - 1052-3057
VL - 31
JO - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
JF - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
IS - 11
M1 - 106792
ER -