TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients
T2 - Time for Target Concentration Intervention
AU - Metz, David K.
AU - Holford, Nick
AU - Kausman, Joshua Y.
AU - Walker, Amanda
AU - Cranswick, Noel
AU - Staatz, Christine E.
AU - Barraclough, Katherine A.
AU - Ierino, Francesco
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. D.K.M. undertook this work during his PhD candidature, which was supported by a Murdoch Children’s Research Institute Postgraduate Health Research Scholarship and a Royal Australasian College of Physicians Jacquot Research Entry Scholarship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - The immunosuppressive agent mycophenolate is used extensively in kidney transplantation, yet dosing strategy applied varies markedly from fixed dosing ("one-dose-fits-all"), to mycophenolic acid (MPA) trough concentration monitoring, to dose optimization to an MPA exposure target (as area under the concentration-time curve [MPA AUC0-12]). This relates in part to inconsistent results in prospective trials of concentration-controlled dosing (CCD). In this review, the totality of evidence supporting mycophenolate CCD is examined: pharmacological characteristics, observational data linking exposure to efficacy and toxicities, and randomized controlled trials of CCD, with attention to dose optimization method and exposure achieved. Fixed dosing of mycophenolate consistently leads to underexposure associated with rejection, as well as overexposure associated with toxicities. When CCD is driven by pharmacokinetic calculation to a target concentration (target concentration intervention), MPA exposure is successfully controlled and clinical benefits are seen. There remains a need for consensus on practical aspects of mycophenolate target concentration intervention in contemporary tacrolimus-containing regimens and future research to define maintenance phase exposure targets. However, given ongoing consequences of both overimmunosuppression and underimmunosuppression in kidney transplantation, impacting short- and long-term outcomes, these should be a priority. The imprecise "one-dose-fits-all" approach should be replaced by the clinically proven MPA target concentration strategy.
AB - The immunosuppressive agent mycophenolate is used extensively in kidney transplantation, yet dosing strategy applied varies markedly from fixed dosing ("one-dose-fits-all"), to mycophenolic acid (MPA) trough concentration monitoring, to dose optimization to an MPA exposure target (as area under the concentration-time curve [MPA AUC0-12]). This relates in part to inconsistent results in prospective trials of concentration-controlled dosing (CCD). In this review, the totality of evidence supporting mycophenolate CCD is examined: pharmacological characteristics, observational data linking exposure to efficacy and toxicities, and randomized controlled trials of CCD, with attention to dose optimization method and exposure achieved. Fixed dosing of mycophenolate consistently leads to underexposure associated with rejection, as well as overexposure associated with toxicities. When CCD is driven by pharmacokinetic calculation to a target concentration (target concentration intervention), MPA exposure is successfully controlled and clinical benefits are seen. There remains a need for consensus on practical aspects of mycophenolate target concentration intervention in contemporary tacrolimus-containing regimens and future research to define maintenance phase exposure targets. However, given ongoing consequences of both overimmunosuppression and underimmunosuppression in kidney transplantation, impacting short- and long-term outcomes, these should be a priority. The imprecise "one-dose-fits-all" approach should be replaced by the clinically proven MPA target concentration strategy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072923017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000002762
DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000002762
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 31584924
AN - SCOPUS:85072923017
SN - 0041-1337
VL - 103
SP - 2012
EP - 2030
JO - Transplantation
JF - Transplantation
IS - 10
ER -