Online searching as a practice for evidence-based medicine in the neonatal intensive care unit, University of Malaya Medical Center, Malaysia: Cross-sectional study

Nor Asiah Muhamad, Vinesha Selvarajah, Anuja Dharmaratne, Anushia Inthiran, Nor Soleha Mohd Dali, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Nai Ming Lai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The use of the internet for research is essential in the practice of evidence-based medicine. The online search habits of medical practitioners in clinical settings, particularly from direct observation, have received little attention. Objective: The goal of the research is to explore online searching for information as an evidence-based practice among medical practitioners. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the clinical teams’ use of evidence-based practice when making clinical decisions for their patients' care. Data were collected through online searches from 2015 to 2018. Participants were medical practitioners and medical students in a Malaysian public teaching hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit who performed online searches to find answers to clinical questions that arose during ward rounds. Results: In search sessions conducted by the participants, 311 queries were observed from 2015 to 2018. Most participants (34/47, 72%) were house officers and medical students. Most of the searches were conducted by house officers (51/99, 52%) and medical students (32/99, 32%). Most searches (70/99, 71%) were directed rather than self-initiated, and 90% (89/99) were completed individually rather than collaboratively. Participants entered an average of 4 terms in each query; three-quarters of the queries yielded relevant evidence, with two-thirds yielding more than one relevant source of evidence. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that junior doctors and medical students need more training in evidence-based medicine skills such as clinical question formulation and online search techniques for performing independent online searches effectively. However, because the findings were based on intermittent opportunistic observations in a specific clinical setting, they may not be generalizable.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere30687
Number of pages12
JournalJMIR Formative Research
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Keywords

  • clinical setting
  • information retrieval
  • information seeking
  • KEYWORDS evidence-based practice
  • online information searching

Cite this