On the linearity of local and regional temperature changes from 1.5°C to 2°C of global warming

Andrew D. King, Reto Knutti, Peter Uhe, Daniel M. Mitchell, Sophie C. Lewis, Julie M. Arblaster, Nicolas Freychet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Given the Paris Agreement it is imperative there is greater understanding of the consequences of limiting global warming to the target 1.5° and 2°C levels above preindustrial conditions. It is challenging to quantify changes across a small increment of global warming, so a pattern-scaling approach may be considered. Here we investigate the validity of such an approach by comprehensively examining how well local temperatures and warming trends in a 1.5°C world predict local temperatures at global warming of 2°C. Ensembles of transient coupled climate simulations from multiple models under different scenarios were compared and individual model responses were analyzed. For many places, the multimodel forced response of seasonalaverage temperatures is approximately linear with global warming between 1.5° and 2°C. However, individual model results vary and large contributions from nonlinear changes in unforced variability or the forced response cannot be ruled out. In some regions, such as East Asia, models simulate substantially greater warming than is expected from linear scaling. Examining East Asia during boreal summer, we find that increased warming in the simulated 2°C world relative to scaling up from 1.5°C is related to reduced anthropogenic aerosol emissions. Our findings suggest that, where forcings other than those due to greenhouse gas emissions change, the warming experienced in a 1.5°C world is a poor predictor for local climate at 2°C of global warming. In addition to the analysis of the linearity in the forced climate change signal, we find that natural variability remains a substantial contribution to uncertainty at these low-warming targets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7495-7514
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Climate
Volume31
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Climate models
  • Model comparison
  • Temperature

Cite this

King, Andrew D. ; Knutti, Reto ; Uhe, Peter ; Mitchell, Daniel M. ; Lewis, Sophie C. ; Arblaster, Julie M. ; Freychet, Nicolas. / On the linearity of local and regional temperature changes from 1.5°C to 2°C of global warming. In: Journal of Climate. 2018 ; Vol. 31, No. 18. pp. 7495-7514.
@article{92a3b445ba5f4098b11a874f1ae7b3cb,
title = "On the linearity of local and regional temperature changes from 1.5°C to 2°C of global warming",
abstract = "Given the Paris Agreement it is imperative there is greater understanding of the consequences of limiting global warming to the target 1.5° and 2°C levels above preindustrial conditions. It is challenging to quantify changes across a small increment of global warming, so a pattern-scaling approach may be considered. Here we investigate the validity of such an approach by comprehensively examining how well local temperatures and warming trends in a 1.5°C world predict local temperatures at global warming of 2°C. Ensembles of transient coupled climate simulations from multiple models under different scenarios were compared and individual model responses were analyzed. For many places, the multimodel forced response of seasonalaverage temperatures is approximately linear with global warming between 1.5° and 2°C. However, individual model results vary and large contributions from nonlinear changes in unforced variability or the forced response cannot be ruled out. In some regions, such as East Asia, models simulate substantially greater warming than is expected from linear scaling. Examining East Asia during boreal summer, we find that increased warming in the simulated 2°C world relative to scaling up from 1.5°C is related to reduced anthropogenic aerosol emissions. Our findings suggest that, where forcings other than those due to greenhouse gas emissions change, the warming experienced in a 1.5°C world is a poor predictor for local climate at 2°C of global warming. In addition to the analysis of the linearity in the forced climate change signal, we find that natural variability remains a substantial contribution to uncertainty at these low-warming targets.",
keywords = "Climate change, Climate models, Model comparison, Temperature",
author = "King, {Andrew D.} and Reto Knutti and Peter Uhe and Mitchell, {Daniel M.} and Lewis, {Sophie C.} and Arblaster, {Julie M.} and Nicolas Freychet",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0649.1",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "7495--7514",
journal = "Journal of Climate",
issn = "0894-8755",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "18",

}

On the linearity of local and regional temperature changes from 1.5°C to 2°C of global warming. / King, Andrew D.; Knutti, Reto; Uhe, Peter; Mitchell, Daniel M.; Lewis, Sophie C.; Arblaster, Julie M.; Freychet, Nicolas.

In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 31, No. 18, 01.09.2018, p. 7495-7514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the linearity of local and regional temperature changes from 1.5°C to 2°C of global warming

AU - King, Andrew D.

AU - Knutti, Reto

AU - Uhe, Peter

AU - Mitchell, Daniel M.

AU - Lewis, Sophie C.

AU - Arblaster, Julie M.

AU - Freychet, Nicolas

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Given the Paris Agreement it is imperative there is greater understanding of the consequences of limiting global warming to the target 1.5° and 2°C levels above preindustrial conditions. It is challenging to quantify changes across a small increment of global warming, so a pattern-scaling approach may be considered. Here we investigate the validity of such an approach by comprehensively examining how well local temperatures and warming trends in a 1.5°C world predict local temperatures at global warming of 2°C. Ensembles of transient coupled climate simulations from multiple models under different scenarios were compared and individual model responses were analyzed. For many places, the multimodel forced response of seasonalaverage temperatures is approximately linear with global warming between 1.5° and 2°C. However, individual model results vary and large contributions from nonlinear changes in unforced variability or the forced response cannot be ruled out. In some regions, such as East Asia, models simulate substantially greater warming than is expected from linear scaling. Examining East Asia during boreal summer, we find that increased warming in the simulated 2°C world relative to scaling up from 1.5°C is related to reduced anthropogenic aerosol emissions. Our findings suggest that, where forcings other than those due to greenhouse gas emissions change, the warming experienced in a 1.5°C world is a poor predictor for local climate at 2°C of global warming. In addition to the analysis of the linearity in the forced climate change signal, we find that natural variability remains a substantial contribution to uncertainty at these low-warming targets.

AB - Given the Paris Agreement it is imperative there is greater understanding of the consequences of limiting global warming to the target 1.5° and 2°C levels above preindustrial conditions. It is challenging to quantify changes across a small increment of global warming, so a pattern-scaling approach may be considered. Here we investigate the validity of such an approach by comprehensively examining how well local temperatures and warming trends in a 1.5°C world predict local temperatures at global warming of 2°C. Ensembles of transient coupled climate simulations from multiple models under different scenarios were compared and individual model responses were analyzed. For many places, the multimodel forced response of seasonalaverage temperatures is approximately linear with global warming between 1.5° and 2°C. However, individual model results vary and large contributions from nonlinear changes in unforced variability or the forced response cannot be ruled out. In some regions, such as East Asia, models simulate substantially greater warming than is expected from linear scaling. Examining East Asia during boreal summer, we find that increased warming in the simulated 2°C world relative to scaling up from 1.5°C is related to reduced anthropogenic aerosol emissions. Our findings suggest that, where forcings other than those due to greenhouse gas emissions change, the warming experienced in a 1.5°C world is a poor predictor for local climate at 2°C of global warming. In addition to the analysis of the linearity in the forced climate change signal, we find that natural variability remains a substantial contribution to uncertainty at these low-warming targets.

KW - Climate change

KW - Climate models

KW - Model comparison

KW - Temperature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052932100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0649.1

DO - 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0649.1

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 7495

EP - 7514

JO - Journal of Climate

JF - Journal of Climate

SN - 0894-8755

IS - 18

ER -