Abstract
Endurantists have recently faced a mereological puzzle in various forms. Here I argue that, instead of presenting a genuine worry, the puzzle actually reveals a common misunderstanding about the endurantist ontology. Furthermore, through this discussion of the alleged problem and the misunderstanding which motivates it, I reveal metaphysical commitments the endurantist has that may not be widely recognized. For instance, she is committed to interesting and perhaps controversial views about shape and location. I highlight these commitments and what they mean for the endurantist
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 91 - 101 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Australasian Journal of Philosophy |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver