Occupational injuries among police workers

patterns and contributing factors in an Australian jurisdiction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Police are regularly exposed to potentially traumatic events, which puts them at risk of physical and psychological injury. International evidence suggests that police have high injury rates relative to other occupations, however most research either focuses on specific situations (e.g., use of force); specific injury causes (e.g., weapons); or specific injury types (e.g. Post-traumatic Stress Disorder). Few studies have focused on understanding injury patterns across the workforce. Thus, the primary objective of this paper was to describe the rate, mechanisms, type and costs of occupational injuries experienced by police in one Australian jurisdiction. Using administrative workers’ compensation claims data, claims records of police were examined for the period 2003/04–2011/12. Descriptive analyses were conducted to characterise the distribution of first and subsequent claims, stratified by claim type (minor, medical and time loss). Rates were calculated using labour force statistics (per 1000 full-time equivalent workers). This study described a number of factors associated with the incidence of injury among police. Over the study period, there was a decrease in first claim rates and an increase in subsequent claim rates across all claim types. Key findings to inform prevention strategies included that younger males (in the 35–44 year age groups) made the most claims, and the greatest proportion of injuries for medical and time loss claims were caused by body stressing (e.g., lifting, carrying). Future research linking corporate statistics to operational/incident information would be beneficial to understand the specific incident factors that are important in outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104525
Number of pages8
JournalSafety Science
Volume122
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

Cite this

@article{becaf352069d465da6c8c6c0ed8edfcb,
title = "Occupational injuries among police workers: patterns and contributing factors in an Australian jurisdiction",
abstract = "Police are regularly exposed to potentially traumatic events, which puts them at risk of physical and psychological injury. International evidence suggests that police have high injury rates relative to other occupations, however most research either focuses on specific situations (e.g., use of force); specific injury causes (e.g., weapons); or specific injury types (e.g. Post-traumatic Stress Disorder). Few studies have focused on understanding injury patterns across the workforce. Thus, the primary objective of this paper was to describe the rate, mechanisms, type and costs of occupational injuries experienced by police in one Australian jurisdiction. Using administrative workers’ compensation claims data, claims records of police were examined for the period 2003/04–2011/12. Descriptive analyses were conducted to characterise the distribution of first and subsequent claims, stratified by claim type (minor, medical and time loss). Rates were calculated using labour force statistics (per 1000 full-time equivalent workers). This study described a number of factors associated with the incidence of injury among police. Over the study period, there was a decrease in first claim rates and an increase in subsequent claim rates across all claim types. Key findings to inform prevention strategies included that younger males (in the 35–44 year age groups) made the most claims, and the greatest proportion of injuries for medical and time loss claims were caused by body stressing (e.g., lifting, carrying). Future research linking corporate statistics to operational/incident information would be beneficial to understand the specific incident factors that are important in outcomes.",
author = "Carlyn Muir and Prang, {Khic Houy} and Dianne Sheppard and Sharon Newnam",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104525",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Occupational injuries among police workers : patterns and contributing factors in an Australian jurisdiction. / Muir, Carlyn; Prang, Khic Houy; Sheppard, Dianne; Newnam, Sharon.

In: Safety Science, Vol. 122, 104525, 01.02.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occupational injuries among police workers

T2 - patterns and contributing factors in an Australian jurisdiction

AU - Muir, Carlyn

AU - Prang, Khic Houy

AU - Sheppard, Dianne

AU - Newnam, Sharon

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - Police are regularly exposed to potentially traumatic events, which puts them at risk of physical and psychological injury. International evidence suggests that police have high injury rates relative to other occupations, however most research either focuses on specific situations (e.g., use of force); specific injury causes (e.g., weapons); or specific injury types (e.g. Post-traumatic Stress Disorder). Few studies have focused on understanding injury patterns across the workforce. Thus, the primary objective of this paper was to describe the rate, mechanisms, type and costs of occupational injuries experienced by police in one Australian jurisdiction. Using administrative workers’ compensation claims data, claims records of police were examined for the period 2003/04–2011/12. Descriptive analyses were conducted to characterise the distribution of first and subsequent claims, stratified by claim type (minor, medical and time loss). Rates were calculated using labour force statistics (per 1000 full-time equivalent workers). This study described a number of factors associated with the incidence of injury among police. Over the study period, there was a decrease in first claim rates and an increase in subsequent claim rates across all claim types. Key findings to inform prevention strategies included that younger males (in the 35–44 year age groups) made the most claims, and the greatest proportion of injuries for medical and time loss claims were caused by body stressing (e.g., lifting, carrying). Future research linking corporate statistics to operational/incident information would be beneficial to understand the specific incident factors that are important in outcomes.

AB - Police are regularly exposed to potentially traumatic events, which puts them at risk of physical and psychological injury. International evidence suggests that police have high injury rates relative to other occupations, however most research either focuses on specific situations (e.g., use of force); specific injury causes (e.g., weapons); or specific injury types (e.g. Post-traumatic Stress Disorder). Few studies have focused on understanding injury patterns across the workforce. Thus, the primary objective of this paper was to describe the rate, mechanisms, type and costs of occupational injuries experienced by police in one Australian jurisdiction. Using administrative workers’ compensation claims data, claims records of police were examined for the period 2003/04–2011/12. Descriptive analyses were conducted to characterise the distribution of first and subsequent claims, stratified by claim type (minor, medical and time loss). Rates were calculated using labour force statistics (per 1000 full-time equivalent workers). This study described a number of factors associated with the incidence of injury among police. Over the study period, there was a decrease in first claim rates and an increase in subsequent claim rates across all claim types. Key findings to inform prevention strategies included that younger males (in the 35–44 year age groups) made the most claims, and the greatest proportion of injuries for medical and time loss claims were caused by body stressing (e.g., lifting, carrying). Future research linking corporate statistics to operational/incident information would be beneficial to understand the specific incident factors that are important in outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074733504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104525

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104525

M3 - Article

VL - 122

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

M1 - 104525

ER -