TY - JOUR
T1 - Nutrition provision in Australian and New Zealand PICUs
T2 - A prospective observational cohort study (ePICUre)
AU - Winderlich, Jacinta
AU - Little, Bridget
AU - Oberender, Felix
AU - Bollard, Tessa
AU - Farrell, Tamara
AU - Jenkins, Samantha
AU - Landorf, Emma
AU - McCall, Andrea
AU - Menzies, Jessica
AU - O'Brien, Katie
AU - Rowe, Carla
AU - Sim, Kirsten
AU - van der Wilk, Melanie
AU - Woodgate, Jemma
AU - Paul, Eldho
AU - Udy, Andrew A.
AU - Ridley, Emma J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge Annabel Doolan (Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane) for contributions to study protocol development; Rachael Cavanagh (Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne) for assistance with study set up; and Linda Nguyen (ANZIC-RC, Monash University) for assistance with preparation of site reports. They also acknowledge the participating Australian and New Zealand PICUs, and the children and families cared for in these units at the time of the study— Monash Children's Hospital, Royal Children's Hospital, Women's & Children's Hospital Adelaide, Perth Children's Hospital, Queensland Children's Hospital, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospital, John Hunter Children's Hospital, and Starship Children's Hospital. They also acknowledge the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcomes and Resource Evaluation (CORE).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Objectives: The main aim of this study was to describe nutrition provision in Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), including mode of nutrition and adequacy of enteral nutrition (EN) to PICU day 28. Secondary aims were to determine the proportion of children undergoing dietetics assessment, the average time to this intervention, and the methods for estimation of energy and protein requirements. Methods: This observational study was conducted in all ANZ tertiary-affiliated specialist PICUs. All children ≤18 y of age admitted to the PICU over a 2-wk period and remaining for ≥48 h were included. Data were collected on days 1 to 7, 14, 21, and 28 (unless discharged prior). Data points included oral intake, EN and parenteral nutrition support, estimated energy and protein adequacy, and dietetics assessment details. Results: We enrolled 141 children, of which 79 were boys (56%) and 84 were <2 y of age (60%). Thirty children (73%) received solely EN on day 7 with documented energy and protein targets for 22 (73%). Of these children, 14 (64%) received <75% of their estimated requirements. A dietetics assessment was provided to 80 children (57%), and was significantly higher in those remaining in the PICU beyond the median length of stay (41% in patients staying ≤4.6 d versus 72% in those staying >4.6 d; P < 0.001). Conclusions: This prospective study of nutrition provision across ANZ PICUs identified important areas for improvement, particularly in EN adequacy and nutrition assessment. Further research to optimize nutrition provision in this setting is urgently needed.
AB - Objectives: The main aim of this study was to describe nutrition provision in Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), including mode of nutrition and adequacy of enteral nutrition (EN) to PICU day 28. Secondary aims were to determine the proportion of children undergoing dietetics assessment, the average time to this intervention, and the methods for estimation of energy and protein requirements. Methods: This observational study was conducted in all ANZ tertiary-affiliated specialist PICUs. All children ≤18 y of age admitted to the PICU over a 2-wk period and remaining for ≥48 h were included. Data were collected on days 1 to 7, 14, 21, and 28 (unless discharged prior). Data points included oral intake, EN and parenteral nutrition support, estimated energy and protein adequacy, and dietetics assessment details. Results: We enrolled 141 children, of which 79 were boys (56%) and 84 were <2 y of age (60%). Thirty children (73%) received solely EN on day 7 with documented energy and protein targets for 22 (73%). Of these children, 14 (64%) received <75% of their estimated requirements. A dietetics assessment was provided to 80 children (57%), and was significantly higher in those remaining in the PICU beyond the median length of stay (41% in patients staying ≤4.6 d versus 72% in those staying >4.6 d; P < 0.001). Conclusions: This prospective study of nutrition provision across ANZ PICUs identified important areas for improvement, particularly in EN adequacy and nutrition assessment. Further research to optimize nutrition provision in this setting is urgently needed.
KW - Critical care
KW - Dietitians
KW - Enteral nutrition
KW - Nutrition
KW - Nutritional adequacy
KW - Pediatric
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177486461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112261
DO - 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112261
M3 - Article
C2 - 37984244
AN - SCOPUS:85177486461
SN - 0899-9007
VL - 118
JO - Nutrition
JF - Nutrition
M1 - 112261
ER -